journal article·2012-10

Structure-performance-fouling studies of polysulfone microfiltration hollow fibre membranes

P S SINGH, K PARASHURAM, S MAURYA, P RAY, A V R REDDY

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 35· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Hollow fibre microfiltration membranes were prepared by solution spinning process using polymer dope containing different amounts of polysulfone (PS), polyvinylpyrollidone (PVP) and \({\bf \textit{N}}\), \({\bf \textit{N}}\)-dimethylformamide (DMF). Spinning dope having PS: PVP: DMF (w/w) of 15: 5: 80, 15: 7: 78 and 17: 8: 75 were used for spinning to obtain hollow fibres having different dimensions (outer and inner diameters) and pore characteristics. Relatively high water permeability was observed for hollow fibre membrane spun from 15 wt. % solution than 17 wt. % PS solution having the same PVP/PS ratio of 0·47. Decrease of the PVP/PS ratio to 0·33 in the dope solution of 15 wt. % PS solution produced hollow fibre membrane with lower flux. By changing the spinning parameters, fibre with different dimensions were obtained without a significant change in microstructural morphology. The flux decline due to fouling for the permeation of PEO/BSA solution was maximum for the hollow fibre membrane obtained from 15 wt. % PS solution while a steady flux with slight fouling was observed for the hollow fibre membrane obtained from 17 wt. % PS solution, when the PVP/PS ratio was 0·47.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Baker R W 2004 Membrane technology and applications (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) 2nd ed.10.1002/0470020393 ↗
2. Czekaj P, López F and Güell C 2000 J. Membr. Sci. 166 19910.1016/S0376-7388(99)00261-6 ↗
3. Jung B, Yoon J K, Kim B and Rhee H-W 2004 J. Membr. Sci. 243 4510.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.011 ↗
4. Kelly S T and Zyndney A L 1997 Biotechnol. Bioeng. 55 9110.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970705)55:1<91::AID-BIT11>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
5. Kelly S T, Zyndney A L and Ho C-C 1999 J. Membr. Sci. 155 26110.1016/S0376-7388(98)00324-X ↗
6. Lafreniere L Y, Talbot F D F, Matsuura T and Sourirajan S 1987 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 26 238510.1021/ie00071a035 ↗
7. Mueller J and Davis R H 1996 J. Membr. Sci. 116 4710.1016/0376-7388(96)00017-8 ↗
8. Nakamura K N and Matsumoto K 2006 J. Membr. Sci. 280 36310.1016/j.memsci.2006.01.039 ↗
9. Nabe A, Staude E and Belfort G 1997 J. Membr. Sci. 133 5710.1016/S0376-7388(97)00073-2 ↗
10. Ochoa N A, Pradanos P, Palacio L, Pagliero C, Marchese J and Hernandez A 2001 J. Membr. Sci. 187 22710.1016/S0376-7388(01)00348-9 ↗
11. Sun X, Kanani D M and Ghosh R 2008 J. Membr. Sci. 320 37210.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.017 ↗
12. Susanto H, Stahra N and Ulbricht M 2009 J. Membr. Sci. 342 15310.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.035 ↗
13. Torrestiana-Sanchez B, Ortiz-Basurto R I and Fuente E B 1999 J. Membr. Sci. 152 1910.1016/S0376-7388(98)00172-0 ↗
14. Tung K L, Li Y-L, Wang S, Nanda D, Hu C-C, Li C-L, Lai J-Y and Huang J 2010 J. Membr. Sci. 352 14310.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.010 ↗
15. Qin J-J, Wong F-S, Li Y and Liu Y-T 2003 J. Membr. Sci. 211 13910.1016/S0376-7388(02)00415-5 ↗
16. Wang D, Li K and Teo W K 1999 J. Membr. Sci. 163 21110.1016/S0376-7388(99)00181-7 ↗
17. van Reis R and Zydney A 2007 J. Membr. Sci. 297 1610.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.045 ↗
18. Wienk I M, Meuleman E E B, Borneman Z, Boomgaard A V and Smolders C A 1995 J. Polym. Sci: Part A: Polym. Chem. 33 4910.1002/pola.1995.080330105 ↗
19. Wienk I M, Boom R M, Beerlage M A M, Bulte A M W, Smolders C A and Strathmann H 1996 J. Membr. Sci. 113 36110.1016/0376-7388(95)00256-1 ↗