journal article·2011-07

Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of reflectivity of nanosized CaTiO3/epoxy resin composites in microwave bands

M. Murugan, V. K. Kokate, M. S. Bapat

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 34· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Microwave absorbing materials play a major role in electromagnetic interference and compatibility measurements in anechoic chambers. Nanocrystalline calcium titanate (CT) was synthesized by hydrothermal method and further composites of CT/epoxy resin were fabricated as thin solid slabs of four different weight ratios. The composite material was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which reveals that CT was observed to be in the monoclinic phase with an average crystallite size of 24 nm. The reflectivity measurement of the composite materials was carried out by the transmission/reflection method using a vector network analyzer R&S: ZVA40, in the X- and Ku-bands. The effective permittivity and permeability of the samples was also computed with the help of measured transmission and reflection coefficients. The results show that CT with equal weight of epoxy resin provides −30 dB at 8.5 GHz in the X-band and −19.5 dB at 18.0 GHz in the Ku-band. Reflectivity was found to be better than −10 dB for 2.2 GHz and 1.9 GHz for X-band and Ku-band, respectively and encourages use of it as potential microwave absorber material.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Abdel H B et al 1997 IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 45 5210.1109/22.552032 ↗
2. Afsar M U et al 1986 Proc. IEEE 74 18310.1109/PROC.1986.13432 ↗
3. Bhanu L A 2003 Proc. Intl. Conf. INCEMIC 87
4. Chen L F et al 2004 (John Wiley Sons: London) Vol 1, p. 175
5. Craig A G 1993 IEEE Intl. Conf. on EMC 245
6. Hiroshi K and Junichi K 1994 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33 546310.1143/JJAP.33.5463 ↗
7. James B J et al 1990 IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 38 109610.1109/22.57336 ↗
8. Jeffrey A J and Michael D J 1996 IEEE MTT-S Int. Symp. Dig. 1407
9. Kim P et al 2007 Adv. Mat. 19 100110.1002/adma.200602422 ↗
10. Li Y et al 2009 J. Phys. Chem. 113 4386
11. Moon J et al 2003 J. European Ceramic Soc. 23 215310.1016/S0955-2219(03)00016-5 ↗
12. Ohba Y et al 2004 Trans. Mater. Res. Soc. Jpn. 29 2077
13. Pashkin A et al 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 38 741
14. Pinatti I M et al 2009 Proc. of ICAM 1
15. Pivovarova A P 2002 J Refract. & Indust. Ceramics NY 43 32910.1023/A:1023428624243 ↗
16. Rajesh et al 2009 Polym. Compos. 30 148010.1002/pc.20716 ↗
17. Silva R A et al 2009 Proc. of 11th Intl. Conf. on Advanced Materials [ICAM 2009] 1
18. Sohel R et al 2009 J. Rein. Plas. & Compos. 28 46110.1177/0731684407085417 ↗
19. Temyoshi H and Tatsum Namikawa 1999 IEEE Trans. Magn. 35 348710.1109/20.800566 ↗
20. Xiaodong C et al 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 40 1827