Optically understanding the dependence of catalysis kinetics on work function of nanocatalyst
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, biogenic ZnO and CuO nanoparticles were fabricated by adopting a complete green aqueous approach utilizing Centella asiatica plant extract. The phytochemicals involved in tailoring the nanoscopic metal oxide particles were characterized vividly. Both of the as-synthesized metal oxide particles are spherical and have a narrow size distribution with an average diameter of about 7 nm as measured via HRTEM. Interestingly, X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of ZnO nanoparticles displays the exposure of its (100) hexagonal facet. The ensuing ZnO and CuO nanoscale particles briskly enhanced the reduction of methylene blue, which was otherwise very slow. The reaction follows first-order kinetics and the rate constants follow the order k uncat < k ZnO NPs < k CuO NPs. The higher catalytic performance of copper oxide nanoparticles than zinc oxide nanoparticles is succinctly established on the basis of their difference in work function values optically.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Salata O V 2004 J. Nanobiotechnol. 2 110.1186/1477-3155-2-3 ↗
2. Iravani S 2011 Green Chem. 13 263810.1039/c1gc15386b ↗
3. Njagi E C, Huang H, Stafford L, Genuino H, Galindo H M, Collins J B, Hoag G E and Sui S L 2011 Langmuir 27 26410.1021/la103190n ↗
4. Singh H P, Gupta N, Sharma S K and Sharma R K 2013 Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 416 4310.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.048 ↗
5. Singh H P, Mitra S and Sharma R K 2014 RSC Adv. 4 6102810.1039/C4RA06367H ↗
6. Tong H, Ouyang S, Bi Y, Umezawa N, Oshikiri M and Ye J 2012 Adv. Mater. 24 22910.1002/adma.201102752 ↗
7. Ghosh M, Biswas K, Sundaresan A and Rao C N R 2006 , J. Mater. Chem. 16 10610.1039/B511920K ↗
8. Bhakta G, Sharma R K, Gupta N, Cool S, Nurcombe V and Maitra A 2011 Nanomed.: Nanotech. Bio. Med. 7 47210.1016/j.nano.2010.12.008 ↗
9. Chakraborty S and Guan H 2010 Dalton Trans. 39 742710.1039/c002942d ↗
10. Cuenya B R 2010 Thin Solid Films 518 312710.1016/j.tsf.2010.01.018 ↗
11. Shankar S S, Rai A, Ahmad A and Sastry M 2004 J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 275 49610.1016/j.jcis.2004.03.003 ↗
12. Baro M, Nayak P, Baby T T and Ramaprabhu S 2013 J. Mater. Chem. A 1 48210.1039/C2TA00483F ↗
13. Kharissova O V, Dias H V R, Kharisov B I, Perez B O and Perez V M J 2013 Trends Biotechnol. 31 24010.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.003 ↗
14. Nadagouda M N 2012 In Modern aspects of bulk crystal and thin film preparation Kolesnikov N (ed) (Rijeka, Croatia: InTech) p 395
15. Singh H P, Gupta N and Sharma R K 2014 J. Biomed. Ther. Sci. 1 34
16. Logeswari P, Silambarasan S and Abraham J 2013 Sci. Iran. F 20 1049
17. Das R K, Borthakur B B and Bora U 2010 Mater. Lett. 64 144510.1016/j.matlet.2010.03.051 ↗
18. Singh S, Singh D R, Banu V S and Avinash N 2014 Ind. Crops Prod. 61 11510.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.045 ↗
19. Okonogi S, Sirithunyalug J and Chen Y 2008 XVI th International conference on bioencapsulation (Dublin, Ireland) p 1
20. Sathishkumar P, Sweena R, Wu J J and Anandan S 2011 Chem. Eng. J. 171 13610.1016/j.cej.2011.03.074 ↗
21. Naika H R, Lingaraju K, Manjunath K, Kumar D, Nagaraju G, Suresh D and Nagabhushana H 2015 J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 9 710.1016/j.jtusci.2014.04.006 ↗
22. Nune S K, Chanda N, Shukla R, Katti K, Kulkarui R R, Thilakavanthy S, Mekapothula S, Kannan R and Katti K V 2009 J. Mater. Chem. 19 291210.1039/b822015h ↗
23. Prasad R 2014 J. Nanopart. Article ID 963961 doi: 10. 1155/2014/96396110.1155/2014/963961 ↗
24. Zheng W, Guo F and Qian Y 2005 Adv. Funct. Mater. 15 33110.1002/adfm.200400080 ↗
25. Deori K, Gupta D, Saha B, Awasthi S K and Deka S 2013 , J. Mater. Chem. A 1 709110.1039/c3ta01590d ↗
26. Wang W, Wang L, Shi H and Liang Y 2012 Cryst. Eng. Comm. 14 591410.1039/c2ce25666e ↗
27. Singh H P, Sharma S, Sharma S K and Sharma R K 2014 RSC Adv. 4 3781610.1039/C4RA04233F ↗
28. Gupta N, Singh H P and Sharma R K 2011 J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem. 335 24810.1016/j.molcata.2010.12.001 ↗
29. Vayenas C G, Babelis S and Ladas S 1990 Nature 343 62510.1038/343625a0 ↗
30. Zhou L and Zachariah M R 2012 Chem. Phys. Lett. 525– 526 7710.1016/j.cplett.2011.11.045 ↗
31. Kevin M, Ong W L, Lee G H and Ho G W 2011 Nanotechnology 22 23570110.1088/0957-4484/22/23/235701 ↗
32. Zhao Y M, Li Y H, Jin Y Z, Zhang X P, Hu W B, Ahmad I, McCartney G and Zhu Y Q 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 61 703
33. Devi H S, Singh N R, Singh H P and Singh T D 2015 , J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 3 204210.1016/j.jece.2015.07.014 ↗
34. Sahoo R, Dutta S, Pradhan M, Ray C, Roy A, Pal T and Pal A 2014 Dalton Trans. 43 667710.1039/c3dt53606h ↗