Effect of height to diameter (h/d) ratio on the deformation behaviour of Fe–Al2O3 metal matrix nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
The present paper reports the effect of height to diameter (h/d) ratio on the deformation behaviour of Fe–Al2O3 metal matrix nanocomposites (MMNCs) during bulk processing. Sintered compacts were machined to the required size with different h/d ratios. Test specimens were subjected to deformation at room temperature under three different interfacial friction conditions such as dry, solid and liquid lubrications. Deformed specimens show a significant improvement in the density and hardness. Results also revealed the formation of a nanosize iron aluminate phase due to reactive sintering, which in turn contributes to grain refinement. Experimental density of the specimens was also verified with the theoretical density using the standard equations. It is expected that the present work will be useful in designing and developing MMNC products with better quality at competitive cost.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced materials and composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Kaczmar J W, Pietrzak K and Wlosinski W 2000 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 106 5810.1016/S0924-0136(00)00639-7 ↗
2. Ralph B, Yuen H C and Lee W B 1997 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 63 33910.1016/S0924-0136(96)02645-3 ↗
3. Miracle D B 2005 Comp. Sci. Tech. 65 252610.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.027 ↗
4. Rosso M 2006 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 175 36410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.038 ↗
5. Harrigan J. W C 1998 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 244 7510.1016/S0921-5093(97)00828-9 ↗
6. Moustafa S F, Hamid Z A and Abd-Elhay A M 2002 Mater. Lett. 53 24410.1016/S0167-577X(01)00485-2 ↗
7. Pournaderi S, Mahdavi S and Akhlaghi F 2012 Powder Technol. 229 27610.1016/j.powtec.2012.06.056 ↗
8. Chen S H and Wang T C 2002 Acta Mech. 157 11310.1007/BF01182158 ↗
9. Sutradhar G, Jha A K and Kumar S 1995 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 51 36910.1016/0924-0136(94)01599-V ↗
10. Gnjidic Z, Bozic D and Mitkov M 2001 Mater. Charact. 47 12910.1016/S1044-5803(01)00161-9 ↗
11. Lin Y C, Li H C, Liou S S and Shie M T 2004 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 373 36310.1016/j.msea.2004.02.011 ↗
12. Rahimian M, Ehsani N, Parvin N and Baharvandi H R 2009 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 538710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.007 ↗
13. Zhang D L, Brindley C and Cantor B 1993 J. Mater. Sci. 28 226710.1007/BF00367593 ↗
14. Sahu K and Jha A K 2012 Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Res. 8 1
15. Mondal M K, Biswas K and Maity J 2013 J. Mater. Engg. Perform. 22 336410.1007/s11665-013-0654-4 ↗
16. Shamanian M, Mohammadnezhad M and Szpunar J 2014 J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23 315210.1007/s11665-014-1087-4 ↗
17. Gupta P, Kumar D, Quraishi M A and Parkash O 2013 Adv. Sci. Eng. Med. 5 36610.1166/asem.2013.1265 ↗
18. Gupta P, Kumar D, Parkash O and Jha A K 2013 Bull. Mater. Sci. 36 85910.1007/s12034-013-0545-1 ↗
19. Gupta P, Kumar D, Parkash O and Jha A K 2014 Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J.: J. Eng. Tribol. 228 36210.1177/1350650113508934 ↗
20. Jha P, Gupta P, Kumar D and Parkash O 2014 J. Compos. Mater. 48 210710.1177/0021998313494915 ↗
21. Gupta P, Kumar D, Parkash O and Jha A K 2014 J. Compos. Art. ID 145973, 110.1155/2014/145973 ↗
22. Kobayashi S 1970 ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 92 391
23. Jha A K and Kumar S 1988 I. Inst. Engs. 68 110
24. Konopka K and Ozieblo A 2001 Mater. Charact. 46 12510.1016/S1044-5803(01)00113-9 ↗
25. Rabiei A, Vendra L and Kishi T 2008 Composites: Part A 39 29410.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.018 ↗