journal article·2016-08

Effect of increasingly metallized hybrid reinforcement on the wear mechanisms of magnesium nanocomposite

S FIDA HASSAN, A M AL-QUTUB, S ZABIULLAH, K S TUN, M GUPTA

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 39· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Strength and ductility of pure magnesium have experienced simultaneous improvement due to the presence of nanosize hybrid (yttria and copper) reinforcement. Increasing the vol% (i.e., 0.3–1.0) of ductile metallic copper particles in reinforcement has further enhanced the strength of magnesium. Wear behaviour of these magnesium hybrid nanocomposites was investigated using pin-on-disc dry sliding tests against hardened tool steel using a constant sliding speed of 1 m s−1 under a range of loads from 5 to 30 N for a sliding distance of 1000 m. Scanning electron microscopy identified abrasion and delamination as primary wear mechanisms in the hybrid nanocomposite. Oxidation was active in nanocomposite with higher copper content, tested under higher load and positively affected the wear resistance. Limited thermal softening was observed when tested at a relatively higher load. High frictional heat dissipation capacity couples with higher hardness resisted adhesive wear which is common mechanism for magnesium composite.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Kainer K U 2003 Magnesium alloys and technology (Weinhei: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co., KGaA)10.1002/3527602046 ↗
2. Logan S 2007 Magnesium technology In: The minerals, metals and materials society (eds) S Randy et al (Orlando: Wiley and Sons) p 41
3. Ye H Z and Liu X Y 2004 J. Mater. Sci. 39 615310.1023/B:JMSC.0000043583.47148.31 ↗
4. Hassan S F and Gupta M 2005 Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36 225310.1007/s11661-005-0344-4 ↗
5. Hassan S F and Gupta M 2007 J. Alloys Compd. 429 17610.1016/j.jallcom.2006.04.033 ↗
6. Hassan S F, Tan M J and Gupta M 2008 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 486 5610.1016/j.msea.2007.08.045 ↗
7. Tun K S and Gupta M 2007 Comp. Sci. Technol. 67 265710.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.006 ↗
8. Mallick A et al 2010, J. Mater. Sci. 45 305810.1007/s10853-010-4312-z ↗
9. Hassan S F and Gupta M 2003 Mater. Sci. Technol. 19 25310.1179/026708303225009346 ↗
10. Nayeb-Hashemi A A and Clark J B 1984 Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. 5 3610.1007/BF02868722 ↗
11. Tun K S, Gupta M and Srivatsan T S 2010 Mater. Sci. Technol. 26 8710.1179/174328408X388095 ↗
12. Hassan S F et al 2015 J. Tribol. 137 011601-1 (4 pages)
13. Smallman R E 1970 Modern physical metallurgy 3rd edn (London: Butterworth)
14. Morrell R 1985 Handbook of properties of technical and engineering ceramics (London: HMSO)
15. Hokkirigawa K and Kato K 1988 Tribol. Int. 21 15110.1016/0301-679X(88)90128-4 ↗
16. Lim C Y H et al 2005, Wear 259 62010.1016/j.wear.2005.02.006 ↗
17. Lim C Y H, Lim S C and Gupta M 2003 Wear 255 62910.1016/S0043-1648(03)00121-2 ↗
18. Sharma S C, Anand B and Krishna M 2000 Wear 241 3310.1016/S0043-1648(00)00349-5 ↗
19. Chen H and Alpas A T 2000 Wear 246 10610.1016/S0043-1648(00)00495-6 ↗
20. Suh N P 1977 Wear 44 110.1016/0043-1648(77)90081-3 ↗
21. Quinn T J F 1962 Br. J. Appl. Phys. 13 3310.1088/0508-3443/13/1/308 ↗
22. Stott F H and Wood G C 1978 Tribol. Int. 11 21110.1016/0301-679X(78)90178-0 ↗
23. So H, Chen H M and Chen L W 2008 Wear 265 114210.1016/j.wear.2008.03.002 ↗