Influence of SMA reinforcement on the impact resistance of GFRP composite laminates under different temperatures
Source abstract
Abstract
Plain glass fibre-reinforced polymeric (GFRP) laminates and GFRP reinforced with randomly oriented short strips of shape memory alloy (SMA) were prepared by hand lay-up method. The SMA strip reinforcement was placed at 0.75 × thickness of the laminate with weight fractions of 2, 4 and 6%. The specimens were exposed to drop weight impact test and the experiments were conducted at a constant impact velocity of 2.80 m s−1 with different test temperatures such as 303, 333 and 363 K. The impact damage area was evaluated using lighting technique and fracture response was analysed using scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images. Absorption of impact energy and damage area due to low velocity impact were calculated. It was observed that with the higher temperature, the SMA/GFRP laminates exhibit marginally-enhanced damage resistance compared to the plain GFRP laminates. Also, addition of SMA reinforcement was not contributing much to the impact resistance at higher temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Abrate S 1991 Appl. Mech. Rev. 44 15510.1115/1.3119500 ↗
2. Kang K W and Kim K 2006 Composite Part A 37 145110.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.016 ↗
3. Zhang R -X, Ni Q -Q, Natsuki T and Iwamoto M 2007 Compos. Struct. 79 9010.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.032 ↗
4. Roh H and Kim H 2002 Compos. Struct. 56 17510.1016/S0263-8223(01)00189-1 ↗
5. Tsoi K A, Stalmans R, Schrooten J, Wevers M and Mai Y W 2003 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 342 20710.1016/S0921-5093(02)00317-9 ↗
6. Karasek M L, Strait H L, Amateau M F and Runt P 1995 J. Camps Technol. Res. 171 11
7. Bibo G A, Leicy D, Hogg P and Kemp M 1994 Compos. 25 41410.1016/0010-4361(94)90097-3 ↗
8. Ibekwe S, Mensah P F, Li G, Pang S S and Stubblefield M A 2007 Compos. Struct. 79 1210.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.025 ↗
9. Kang K W, Kim H J and Kim J K 2007 J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 21 168210.1007/BF03177394 ↗
10. Metin Sayer, Numan B Bektas, Ersin Demir and Hasan Callioglu 2012, Composite Part B 43 215210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.037 ↗
11. Amin Salehi-Khojin, Mohammad Mahinfalah, Reza Bashirzadeh and Brian Freeman 2007, J. Compos. Struct. 78 19710.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.005 ↗
12. Amal A M Badawy 2012, Ain Shams Eng. J. 3 10510.1016/j.asej.2012.01.001 ↗
13. Xu Y, Otsuka K, Nagai H, Yoshida H, Asai M and Kishi T 2003 Scripta Mater. 49 58710.1016/S1359-6462(03)00327-0 ↗
14. Ki-Weon Kang and Jung-Kyu Kim 2009, Compos. Struct. 88 45510.1016/j.compstruct.2008.05.005 ↗
15. Pazhanivel K, Bhaskar G B, Arunachalam S, Hariharan V and Elayaperumal A 2012 Appl. Mech. Mater. 632 110–116
16. Pazhanivel K, Bhaskar G B, Elayaperumal A, Anandan P and Arunachalam S 2015 Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 40 111110.1007/s13369-015-1571-7 ↗
17. Raghavan J, Trevor Berthikerkie, Shawna Boyko, Mike Kupriyanav, Rajabakse N and Ben Yu 2010, Composite Part B 41 21410.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.009 ↗
18. Lau K-T, Ling H-Y and Zhou L-M 2004, Smart Mater. Struct. 13 36410.1088/0964-1726/13/2/015 ↗
19. Ni Q-Q, Zhang R-X, Natsuki T and Iwamoto M 2007 Compos. Struct. 79 50110.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.009 ↗