journal article·2022-03

Highly efficient degradation of rhodamine B by α-MnO2 nanorods

Shumin Wang, Ao Guan, Jiahan Wang, Xiaofang Fu, Xiang Guo, Yuan Tian, Kaixuan Wang, Wenping Cao, Cuimei Zhao

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Manganese dioxide (α-MnO2) nanorods with diameters of about 5–15 nm and lengths of 100–150 nm were synthesized by a simple co-precipitation method, and the degradation mechanism of rhodamine B (RhB) at different pH levels was investigated. The α-MnO2 nanorods exhibited a high efficiency and rapid removal rate of RhB, which reached about 97.5% within 10 min when pH = 4 (and pH = 6.6) and 97.7% within 50 min when pH = 9 in the presence of H2O2. The results also indicated that a lower pH value is conducive to the blue shift of the characteristic peak of RhB dye and the attenuation of the characteristic peak intensity, which is mainly attributed to the combined effect of oxidative degradation and adsorption decolourization when pH is less than 9. Moreover, the α-MnO2 nanorod exhibits an excellent recyclability and catalytic stability. This research indicates that α-MnO2 nanorods have a potential application in practical dye pollutant treatment.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Gagrani A, Zhou J W and Tsuzuki T 2018 Ceram. Int. 44 469410.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.050 ↗
2. Zhao G X, Li J X, Ren X M, Hu J, Hu W P and Wang X K 2013 RSC Adv. 3 1290910.1039/c3ra40942b ↗
3. Sun H, Xu K L, Huang M J, Shang Y X, She P, Yin S Y et al 2015 Appl. Sur. Sci. 357 6910.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.258 ↗
4. Anandkumar J and Mandal B 2011 J. Hazard. Mater. 186 108810.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.104 ↗
5. Yu K, Yang S G, He H, Sun C, Gu C G and Ju Y M 2009 J. Phys. Chem. A 113 1002410.1021/jp905173e ↗
6. Thabit M, Liu H L, Zhang J and Wan B 2017 J. Environ. Sci. 60 5310.1016/j.jes.2017.06.042 ↗
7. Lee S Y, Kang D, Jeong S, Do H T and Kim J H 2020 ACS Omega 5 423310.1021/acsomega.9b04127 ↗
8. Yu C L, Li G, Wei L F, Fan Q Z, Shu Q and Yu J C 2014 Catal. Today 224 15410.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.029 ↗
9. Qu J Y, Shi L, He C X, Gao F, Li B B, Zhou Q et al 2014 Carbon 66 48510.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.025 ↗
10. Sun M, Lan B, Lin T, Cheng G, Ye F, Yu L et al 2013 CrystEngComm 15 701010.1039/c3ce40603b ↗
11. Li K Z, Chen J J, Peng Y, Lin W C, Yan T and Li J H 2017 J. Mater. Chem. A 5 2091110.1039/C7TA04624C ↗
12. He B B, Gao C, Zhao S F, Zeng X H, Li Y F, Yang R N et al 2019 J. Solid State Chem. 269 30510.1016/j.jssc.2018.09.005 ↗
13. Boyom-Tatchemo F W, Devred F, Ndiffo-Yemeli G, Laminsi S and Gaigneaux E M 2020 Appl. Catal. B Environ. 260 11815910.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118159 ↗
14. Husnain S M, Asim U, Yaqub A, Shahzad F and Abbas N 2020 New J. Chem. 44 609610.1039/C9NJ06392G ↗
15. Khalid S and Cao C B 2017 New J. Chem. 41 579410.1039/C7NJ00228A ↗
16. Maria-Hormigos R, Pacheco M, Jurado-Sánchez B and Escarpa A 2018 Environ. Sci. Nano 5 299310.1039/C8EN00824H ↗
17. Kang Y G, Yoon H, Lee C S, Kim E J and Chang Y S 2019 Water Res. 151 41310.1016/j.watres.2018.12.038 ↗
18. Huang J Z, Zhong S F, Dai Y F, Liu C C and Zhang H C 2018 Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 1130910.1021/acs.est.8b03383 ↗
19. Saputra E, Muhammad S, Sun H, Ang H M, Tade M and Wang S 2013 Sci. Technol. 47 588210.1021/es400878c ↗
20. Meng Y T, Song W Q, Huang H, Ren Z, Chen S Y and Suib S L 2014 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 1145210.1021/ja505186m ↗
21. Zhang B T, Cheng G, Ye W J, Zheng X Y, Liu H F, Sun M et al 2016 Dalton Trans. 45 1885110.1039/C6DT03523J ↗
22. Gangwar D and Rath C 2021 Appl. Surf. Sci. 557 14969310.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149693 ↗
23. Khan Y, Durrani S K, Mehmood M and Khan M R 2011 J. Mater. Res. 26 226810.1557/jmr.2011.138 ↗
24. Subramanian V, Zhu H W, Vajtai R, Ajayan P M and Wei B Q 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 2020710.1021/jp0543330 ↗
25. Mishra K, Poudel T N, Basavegowda N and Lee Y R 2016 J. Catal. 344 27310.1016/j.jcat.2016.09.020 ↗
26. Wang Y R, Zhang X F, He X, Zhang W, Zhang X X and Lu C H 2014 Carbohyd. Polym. 110 30210.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.008 ↗
27. Mahamallik P, Saha S and Pal A 2015 Chem. Eng. J. 276 15510.1016/j.cej.2015.04.064 ↗
28. Panimalar S, Uthrakumar R, Selvi E T, Gomathy P, Inmozhi C, Kaviyarasu K et al 2020 Surf. Interfaces 20 10051210.1016/j.surfin.2020.100512 ↗
29. Sing K S W 1982 Pure Appl. Chem. 54 220110.1351/pac198254112201 ↗
30. John R E, Chandran A, Thomas M, Jose J and George K C 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 367 4310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.153 ↗
31. Huang C, Wang Y L, Gong M, Wang W, Mu Y and Hu Z H 2020 Purif. Technol. 230 11587710.1016/j.seppur.2019.115877 ↗
32. Watanabe T, Takizawa T and Honda K 1977 J. Phys. Chem. 81 184510.1021/j100534a012 ↗
33. Han J, Wang M G, Cao S Y, Fang P, Lu S, Chen R et al 2013 J. Mater. Chem. A 1 1319710.1039/c3ta12545a ↗
34. Pham A L T, Doyle F M and Sedlak D L 2012 Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 105510.1021/es203612d ↗
35. Zhang W X, Yang Z H, Wang X, Zhang Y C, Wen X G and Yang S H 2006 Catal. Commun. 7 40810.1016/j.catcom.2005.12.008 ↗
36. He Y, Jiang D B, Chen J, Jiang D Y and Zhang Y X 2018 J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 510 20710.1016/j.jcis.2017.09.066 ↗
37. Khraisheh M A M, Al-Ghouti M A, Allen S J and Ahmad M N M 2004 Water Environ. Res. 76 265510.1002/j.1554-7531.2004.tb00227.x ↗
38. Deng J, Ge Y J, Tan C Q, Wang H Y, Li Q S, Zhou S Q J et al 2017 Chem. Eng. J. 330 139010.1016/j.cej.2017.07.137 ↗