Analysis of hardness of nanocrystalline coatings of aluminum-rich Ti1 − x Al x N
Source abstract
Abstract
Titanium aluminum nitride coatings were fabricated by a d.c. magnetron sputtering system from a Ti–Al (60/40 wt%) target. Coatings were deposited on steel substrates, at a substrate temperature of 250 °C and a bias voltage of −80 V. The nitrogen flow was varied from 1·5–6 sccm and the Ar flow was kept constant at 20 sccm. The morphology and microstructure of the coatings were analysed by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. The results of X-ray diffraction showed the presence of two cubic crystalline phases, TiN and AlN, which were confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The Vicker hardness was obtained by the effective model of indentation. It was observed that the hardness of the coatings decreases from 22·8–9·5 GPa with an increased nitrogen content from 1·5–4·5 sccm. Subsequently, the hardness increased to 22·1 GPa by increasing nitrogen to 6 sccm. The behavior of hardness with grain size variation is consistent with the Hall-Peth relationship. The high value in the hardness of the coatings is mainly attributed to small grain sizes and the compressive stress present.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Amini Mashhadi H, Kennedy G, Tanaka S and Hokamoto K 2011 Physica B 406 121110.1016/j.physb.2010.12.006 ↗
2. Bunshah R F 2001 Handbook of hard coatings (New York: William Andrew Publishing/Noyes)
3. Chawla V, Chandra R and Jayaganthan R 2010 J. Alloys Compd 507 L4710.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.017 ↗
4. Donohue L A et al 1999 Vacuum 55 10910.1016/S0042-207X(99)00135-9 ↗
5. Endrino J L, Fox-Rabinovich G S and Gey C 2006 Surf. Coat. Technol. 200 684010.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.10.030 ↗
6. Ensinger W, Schröer A and Wolf G K 1992 Surf. Coat. Technol. 51 21710.1016/0257-8972(92)90241-2 ↗
7. Hall E O 1951 Proc. Phys. Soc. B 64 74710.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
8. Hirvonen J K 1991 Mater. Sci. Rep. 6 21510.1016/0920-2307(91)90008-B ↗
9. Korsunsky A M, McGurk M R, Bull S J and Page T F 1998 Surf. Coat. Technol. 99 17110.1016/S0257-8972(97)00522-7 ↗
10. Kutschej K, Mayrhofer P H, Kathrein M, Polcik P, Tessandri R and Mitterer C 2005 Surf. Coat. Technol. 200 235810.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.12.008 ↗
11. Mayrhofer P H, Mitterer C, Hultman L and Clemens H 2006 Prog. Mater. Sci. 51 103210.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.02.002 ↗
12. McKeehan M and Warren B E 1953 J. Appl. Phys. 24 5210.1063/1.1721133 ↗
13. Morimoto A, Shigeno H, Morita S, Yonezawa Y and Shimizu T 1998 Appl. Surf. Sci. 127–129 99410.1016/S0169-4332(97)00780-0 ↗
14. Münz W D 1986 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4 271710.1116/1.573713 ↗
15. Musil J and Hrubý H 2000 Thin Solid Films 365 10410.1016/S0040-6090(00)00653-2 ↗
16. Park I W and Kim K H 2001 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 130–131 254
17. Petch N J 1953 J. Iron Steel Inst. 174 25
18. Rafaja D, Šíma M, Klemm V, Schreiber G, Heger D, Havela L and Kužel R 2004 J. Alloys Compd 378 10710.1016/j.jallcom.2003.10.087 ↗
19. Schuler A, Thommen V, Reimann P, Oelhafen P, Francz G, Zehnder T, Duggelin M, Mathys D and Guggenheim R 2001 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A19 92210.1116/1.1359532 ↗
20. Shirley D A 1972 Phys. Rev. B 5 470910.1103/PhysRevB.5.4709 ↗
21. Shum P W, Zhou Z F, Li K Y and Shen Y G 2003 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 100 20410.1016/S0921-5107(03)00107-7 ↗
22. Suzuki T, Makino Y, Samandi M and Miyake S 2000 J. Mater. Sci. 35 419310.1023/A:1004835111782 ↗
23. Wolf G K, Barth M and Ensinger W 1989 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res., Sect. B 37–38 68210.1016/0168-583X(89)90274-7 ↗
24. Zywitzki O, Klostermann H, Fietzke F and Modes T 1999 Surf. Coat. Technol. 200 652210.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.018 ↗