Effect of electrodeposition potential on composition and morphology of CIGS absorber thin film
Source abstract
Abstract
CuInGaSe (CIGS) thin films were deposited on Mo/soda-lime glass substrates by electrodeposition at different potentials ranging from −0·3 to −1·1 V vs Ag/AgCl. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) studies of unitary Cu, Ga, In and Se systems, binary Cu–Se, Ga–Se and In–Se systems and quaternary Cu–In–Ga–Se were carried out to understand the mechanism of deposition of each constituent. Concentration of the films was determined by energy dispersive spectroscopy. Structure and morphology of the films were characterized by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscope. The underpotential deposition mechanism of Cu–Se and In–Se phases was observed in voltammograms of binary and quaternary systems. Variation in composition with applied potentials was explained by cyclic voltammetry (CV) data. A suitable potential range from −0·8 to −1·0 V was found for obtaining films with desired and stable stoichiometry. In the post-annealing films, chalcopyrite structure starts forming in the samples deposited at −0·5 V and grows on varying the applied potential towards negative direction. By adjusting the composition of electrolyte, we obtained the desired stoichiometry of Cu(In0·7Ga0·3)Se2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Abrantes I M, Araujo L V and Veli D 1995 Miner. Eng. 8 146710.1016/0892-6875(95)00111-5 ↗
2. Bhatacharya R N, Batchelor W, Grannata J E, Hasoon H, Wiensner H, Ramanathan K, Keane J and Noufi R N 1998 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. C. 55 8310.1016/S0927-0248(98)00049-X ↗
3. Bhatacharya R N, Hiltner J F, Batchelor W, Contreras M A, Noufi R N and Sites J R 2000 Thin Solid Films 361 39610.1016/S0040-6090(99)00809-3 ↗
4. Fernandez A M and Bhatacharya R N 2005 Thin Solid Films 474 1010.1016/j.tsf.2004.02.104 ↗
5. Friedfeld R, Raffelle R D and Mantovani J G 1999 Sol. Energy Mater. C. 58 37510.1016/S0927-0248(99)00010-0 ↗
6. Ganchev M, Kois J, Kaelin M, Bereznev S, Tzvetkova E, Volubuzeva O, Stratieva N and Tiwari A 2006 Thin Solid Films 511–512 32510.1016/j.tsf.2005.11.076 ↗
7. Hermann A M, Wesfall R and Wind R 1998 Sol. Energy Mater. C. 52 35510.1016/S0927-0248(97)00250-X ↗
8. Kampmann A, Sittinger V, Rechid J and Reineke-Koch R 2000 Thin Solid Films 361–362 30910.1016/S0040-6090(99)00863-9 ↗
9. Kampmann A, Rechid J, Raitzig A, Wulff S, Mihhalova M, Thyen R and Kaberlah K 2003 Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 763 32310.1557/PROC-763-B8.5 ↗
10. Kang F, Ao J, Sun G, He Q and Sun Y 2010 Curr. Appl. Phys. 10 88610.1016/j.cap.2009.10.015 ↗
11. Lai Y, Liu F, Zhang Z, Liu J, Li Y, Kuang S, Li J and Liu Y 2009 Electrochim. Acta 54 300410.1016/j.electacta.2008.12.016 ↗
12. Liu J, Liu F, Lai Y, Zhang Z, Li J and Liu Y 2011 J. Electroanal. Chem. 651 19110.1016/j.jelechem.2010.10.021 ↗
13. Massaccesi S, Sanchez S and Vedel J 1996 J. Electroanal. Chem. 412 9510.1016/0022-0728(96)04604-9 ↗
14. Mishra K K and Rajeshwar K 1989 Electroanal. Chem. 271 27910.1016/0022-0728(89)80082-8 ↗
15. Repinst L, Contreras M A, Egaas B, Hart C De, Scharf J, Perkins C L, To B and Noufi R 2008 Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 16 23510.1002/pip.822 ↗
16. Thouin L, Rouquette-Sanchez S and Vedel J 1993 Electrochim. Acta 38 238710.1016/0013-4686(93)85107-A ↗
17. Zank J, Mehlin M and Fritz H P 1996 Thin Solid Films 286 25910.1016/S0040-6090(95)08214-X ↗
18. Zhang L, Jiang F D and Feng J Y 2003 Sol. Energy Mater. C. 80 48310.1016/j.solmat.2003.06.014 ↗