Effect of oil and oil with graphite on tribological properties of glass filled PTFE polymer composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Present work deals with the experimental investigation of tribological properties of GF-filled polymer composites considering three velocities, i.e. 0.5, 1 and 2.0 m/s and loads ranging from 15.7 N to 45.13 N keeping rest of the parameters constant. The test has been carried out for three materials, PTFE + 15% GF, PTFE + 25% GF and PTFE + 35% GF in wet (oil) and adding additive as graphite (5% wt) in oil. SAE 20W40 oil is used for the test. Friction and wear tests of PTFE composite against a counter surface of EN8 with surface finish of 0.56 μm are carried out at ambient conditions using pin-on-disc tribometre (TR-20), Ducom make, Bangalore. The results are tabulated and graphs are plotted. It has been found that load and wet conditions have significant effect on coefficient of friction and specific wear rate of the materials. Where as sliding velocity also plays little role in wear mechanism of the material. It is concluded from the experimental study that the specific wear rate in wet condition as well as by adding additives in lubricating oil with 5% (by wt.) has been declined. Also the specific wear rate decreases with normal load and sliding velocity. Wear of PTFE + GF composite decreases with increase in glass percentage. Microscopic analysis of pin and disc surface is made with optical microscope. The mathematical models has been developed by using regression analysis and found to be valid for the above tested parameters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Briscoe B J and Tabor D 1980 Tribology 733
2. Baiming Chen, Qinling Bi, Jun Yang, Yanqiu Xia and Jingcheng Hao 2008 Tribol. Int. 38 824
3. Bin-Bin Jia, Tong-Sheng Li, Xu-Jun Liu and Pei-Hong Cong 2007 Wear 262 135310.1016/j.wear.2007.01.011 ↗
4. Bressana J D, Darosa D P and Barbosad C A 2008 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 205 35310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.251 ↗
5. Erol Feyzullahoglu and Zehra Saffak 2008 Mater. & Design 29 20510.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.012 ↗
6. Feng-hua Sua, Zhao-zhu Zhang and Wei-min Liu 2008 Wear 265 31110.1016/j.wear.2007.10.013 ↗
7. Gregory S W, Freudenberg K D, Bhimaraj P and Schadler L S 2003 Wear 254 57310.1016/S0043-1648(03)00252-7 ↗
8. Klaasa N V, Marcusa K and Kellock C 2005 Tribol. Inter. 38 82410.1016/j.triboint.2005.02.010 ↗
9. Klaus Friedrich, Zhong Zhang and Alois K Schlarb 2005 Compos. Sci. & Technol. 65 23
10. Kowandya C, Richarda C and Chenb Y M 2008 Wear 264 115210.1016/j.wear.2007.01.031 ↗
11. Lancaster J K 1968 J. Phys. DI 549
12. Shirsat U M and Ahuja B B 2005 IE (I) J. MC 86
13. Shyam Bahadur 2000 Wear 245 9210.1016/S0043-1648(00)00469-5 ↗
14. Theiler G, Hubner W and Friedrich K 2002 Tribol. Int. 35 44910.1016/S0301-679X(02)00035-X ↗
15. Unal H, Mimaroglu A, Kadýoglu U and Ekiz H 2004 Mater. & Design 25 23910.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.009 ↗
16. Unal H, Sen U and Mimaroglu A 2006 Mater. & Design 27 69410.1016/j.matdes.2004.12.013 ↗
17. Wu Y Y, Tsui W C and Liu T C 2007 Wear 262 81910.1016/j.wear.2006.08.021 ↗
18. Yuji Yamamoto and Masaaki Hashimoto 2004 Wear 257 18110.1016/j.wear.2003.12.004 ↗
19. Yunxia Wang and Fengyuan Yan 2006 Wear 261 135910.1016/j.wear.2006.03.050 ↗
20. Zhao-Zhu Zhang, Qun-Ji Xue, Wei-Min Liu and Wei-Chang Shen 1997 Wear 210 15110.1016/S0043-1648(97)00052-5 ↗