Electrolytic deposition and corrosion resistance of Zn-Ni coatings obtained from sulphate-chloride bath
Source abstract
Abstract
Zn-Ni coatings were deposited under galvanostatic conditions on steel substrate (OH18N9). The influence of current density of deposition on the surface morphology, chemical and phase composition was investigated. The corrosion resistance of Zn-Ni coatings obtained at current density 10–25 mA cm−2 are measured, and are compared with that of metallic cadmium coating. Structural investigations were performed by the X-ray diffraction (XRD) method. The surface morphology and chemical composition of deposited coatings were studied using a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-6480) with EDS attachment. Studies of electrochemical corrosion resistance were carried out in the 5% NaCl, using potentiodynamic and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) methods. On the ground of these research, the possibility of deposition of Zn-Ni coatings contained 24–26% at. Ni was exhibited. It was stated, that surface morphology, chemical and phase composition of these coatings are practically independent on current density of deposition. On the basis of electrochemical investigations it was found that corrosion resistance of these Zn-Ni coatings is also independent of current density. These coatings are more corrosion resistant in 5% NaCl solution than metallic cadmium. It was suggested that the Zn-Ni coating may be used as a substitute for toxic cadmium.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (8)
Show source-provided references
1. Abd el Rehim S S, Fouad E E, Abd el Wahab S M and Hassan H H 1996 Electrochem. Acta 41 141310.1016/0013-4686(95)00327-4 ↗
2. Bajat J B, Kačarević-Popović Z, Mišković-Stankowić V B and Maksimowić M D 2000 Prog. Org. Coat. 39 12710.1016/S0300-9440(00)00127-2 ↗
3. Fratesi R and Roventi G 1996 Surf. Coat. Technol. 82 15810.1016/0257-8972(95)02668-1 ↗
4. Ganesan P, Kumaraguru S P and Popov B N 2007 Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 789610.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.03.033 ↗
5. Gavrila M, Millet J P, Mazile H, Marchandise D and Cuntz J M 2000 Surf. Coat. Technol. 123 16410.1016/S0257-8972(99)00455-7 ↗
6. Karimi-Shervedani R and Lasia A 1997 J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 265210.1149/1.1837878 ↗
7. Karimi-Shervedani R and Lasia A 1998 J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 221910.1149/1.1838623 ↗
8. Petrauskas A, Grincevičienė L, Češūnienė A and Matulionis E 2005 Surf. Coat. Technol. 192 29910.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.08.191 ↗