journal article·2011-12

Effect of ZnO loading technique on textural characteristic and methyl blue removal capacity of exfoliated graphite/ZnO composites

Xueqing Yue, Wenyan Duan, Yan Lu, Fucheng Zhang, Ruijun Zhang

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 34· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Two exfoliated graphite/ZnO composites, marked as EG/ZnO-1 and EG/ZnO-2, were prepared by heating a mixture of expandable graphite and Zn(OH)2 or a mixture of expanded graphite (EG) and Zn(OH)2, respectively. The composites were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and nitrogen adsorption. Under UV irradiation, the composites were used for removing methyl blue (MB) from aqueous solution. For the composites made from expandable graphite (EG/ZnO-1), the micronsized ZnO particle agglomerates (1–20 μm) heterogeneously distributed at the surface of graphite flakes, while for the composites made from EG (EG/ZnO-2), the submicron-sized ZnO particle masses (0·2–0·5 μm) almost homogeneously located both at the surface and interior of graphite flakes. In the presence of UV irradiation, the composites had the adsorption capacity of EG and the photocatalysis capacity of ZnO at the same time. Compared with EG/ZnO-1, EG/ZnO-2 was more effective in removing MB. After 2 h of UV irradiation, MB could be completely removed by using the EG/ZnO-2 containing 45% ZnO, and the decomposition efficiency of the ZnO was the primary cause for the removal of MB.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Chung D D L 1987 J. Mater. Sci. 22 419010.1007/BF01132008 ↗
2. Daneshvar N, Rasoulifard M H, Khataee A R and Hosseinzadeh F 2007 J. Hazard. Mater. 143 9510.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.08.072 ↗
3. Inagaki M, Toyoda M, Kang F Y, Zhang Y P and Shen W C 2003 New Carbon Mater. 18 241
4. Kang F Y, Zhang Y P, Zhao H N, Wang L N, Shen W C and Inagaki M 2003 New Carbon Mater. 18 161
5. Li J H, Li M, Li J, Xu Y, Jia Z X and Li M 2008 Ultrason. Sonochem. 15 94910.1016/j.ultsonch.2008.03.002 ↗
6. Li J T, Li M, Li J H and Sun H W 2007 Ultrason. Sonochem. 14 6210.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.01.006 ↗
7. Lizama C, Freer J, Baeza J and Mansilla H 2002 Catal. Today 76 23510.1016/S0920-5861(02)00222-5 ↗
8. Quintana M, Ricra E, Rodriguez J and Estrada W 2002 Catal. Today 76 14110.1016/S0920-5861(02)00214-6 ↗
9. Savoskin M V, Yaroshenko A P, Lazareva N I, Mochalin V N and Mysyk R D 2006 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 67 120510.1016/j.jpcs.2006.01.049 ↗
10. Shornikova O N, Sorokina N E and Avdeev W 2008 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 69 116810.1016/j.jpcs.2007.10.136 ↗
11. Toyoda M and Inagaki M 2000 Carbon 38 19910.1016/S0008-6223(99)00174-8 ↗
12. Tryba B, Morawski A W, Kalenczuk R J and Inagaki M 2003 Spill Sci. Technol. Bull. 8 56910.1016/S1353-2561(03)00070-7 ↗
13. Wang H and Xie C S 2008 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 69 244010.1016/j.jpcs.2008.04.036 ↗
14. Yeber M C, Rodriguez J, Freer J, Baeza J, Duran N and Mansilla H 1999 Chemosphere 39 167910.1016/S0045-6535(99)00068-5 ↗
15. Yue X Q, Zhang R J, Wang W Y, Wang L Q and Yang Y L 2008 Mater. Lett. 62 191910.1016/j.matlet.2007.10.042 ↗
16. Zheng Y P, Wang H N, Kang F Y, Wang L N and Inagaki M 2004 Carbon 42 260310.1016/j.carbon.2004.05.041 ↗