journal article·2013-02

Development of hydroxyapatite bone cement for controlled drug release via tetracycline hydrochloride

SAYED MAHMOOD RABIEE

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 36· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to study the preparation and characterization of drug–hydroxyapatite cement. The hydroxyapatite (HA) cement has been synthesized by using tricalcium phosphate, calcium carbonate and dicalcium phosphate anhydrous with sodium hydrogen phosphate as liquid phase. The effect of added tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) as drug on final phases, microstructure, setting behaviour and compressive strength has been studied. The drug release rate was first order within the first day and then was zero order. No obvious difference could be detected in XRD patterns of the TCH–HA cement with various amounts of drug. By increasing the drug concentration, mechanical strength of cement was decreased and its setting time was increased. The results of this study demonstrate the potential of using HA cement as a carrier for drug delivery.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Barralet J E, Grover L M and Gbureck U 2004 J. Biomater. 25 219710.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.085 ↗
2. Fernández E, Sarda S and Hamcerencu M 2005 J. Biomater. 26 228910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.043 ↗
3. Ginebra M P, Traykova T and Planell J A 2006 J. Control. Release 113 10210.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.007 ↗
4. Hench L 1991 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 148710.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x ↗
5. Ishikawa K, Miyamoto Y, Kon M, Nagayama M and Asaoka K 1995 J. Biomater. 16 52710.1016/0142-9612(95)91125-I ↗
6. Josse S et al 2005 J. Biomater. 26 207310.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.019 ↗
7. Knabe C, Driessens F C M, Planell J A and Gildenhar R 2000 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 52 49810.1002/1097-4636(20001205)52:3<498::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
8. Komath M, Varma H K and Ivakumar R 2000 Bull. Mater. Sci. 23 13510.1007/BF02706555 ↗
9. Lebugle A, Rodrigues A, Bonnevialle P, Voigt J J, Canal P and Rodriguez F 2002 J. Biomater. 23 351710.1016/S0142-9612(02)00082-0 ↗
10. Okada Y, Kawanabe K, Fujita H, Nishio K and Nakamura T 1999 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 47 35310.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19991205)47:3<353::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
11. Ooms E M, Wolke J G C and de Heuvel M T U 2003 J. Biomater. 24 98910.1016/S0142-9612(02)00438-6 ↗
12. Peter B et al 2005 Bone 36 5210.1016/j.bone.2004.10.004 ↗
13. Rabiee S M, Moztarzadeh F, Solati-Hashjin M and Salimi-Kenari H 2008 Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 87 43
14. Schnieders J, Gbureck U, Thull R and Kissel T 2006 J. Biomater. 27 423910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.032 ↗
15. Sokolova V, Radtke I F, Heumann R and Epple M 2006 J. Biomater. 27 314710.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.030 ↗
16. Suchaneck W and Yoshimura M 1998 J. Mater. Res. 13 95
17. Takagi S, Chow L C and Ishikawa K 1998 J. Biomater. 19 159310.1016/S0142-9612(97)00119-1 ↗
18. Ueno Y, Futagawa H, Takagi Y, Ueno A and Mizushima Y 2005 J. Control. Release 103 9310.1016/j.jconrel.2004.11.015 ↗
19. Yang Q, Troczynki T and Liu D M 2002 J. Biomater. 23 275110.1016/S0142-9612(02)00010-8 ↗