Effect of bauxite addition on densification and mullitization behaviour of West Bengal clay
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of bauxite addition on the densification and mullitization of reaction sintered bauxite-clay mixture had been studied in the temperature range 1400–1500°C. The maximum bulk density (2·89 g/cc) and minimum apparent porosity (0·58%) was achieved by addition of 50 wt% bauxite. The impurities present in bauxite and clay formed liquid phase which helped in particle diffusion to aid densification. The X-ray diffraction of sample fired at 1500°C showed cristoballite phase gradually disappearing and at the same time mullite and α-Al2O3 phase appearing at a higher level of bauxite addition. The in situ nascent alumina formed was reactive that facilitated the formation of secondary mullite by solution precipitation mechanism. The presence of bauxite also changed the morphology of the mullite particles. Two types of mullite were distinctly observed in the SEM photographs: elongated primary mullite and equiaxed secondary mullite.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Amutharani D and Gnanam F D 1999 Mater. Sci. Engg. A264 25410.1016/S0921-5093(98)01094-6 ↗
2. Bakr M and Naga S M 2002 Br. Ceram. Trans. 101 13310.1179/096797802225003325 ↗
3. Boch P and Chartier T 1991 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 244810.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06783.x ↗
4. Brownel W E 1958 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 41 220
5. Chen C Y, Lan G S and Tuan W H 2000 J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 20 251910.1016/S0955-2219(00)00125-4 ↗
6. Grimshaw R W 1971 The chemistry and physics of clay and allied materials (London, Ernest Benn Ltd.) 4th ed. p. 329
7. Johnson S M, Pask J A and Moya J S 1982 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65 3110.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb09918.x ↗
8. Johnson S M and Pask J A 1982 Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 61 838
9. Klug F J, Prochazka S and Doremur R H 1990 Mullite and mullite matrix composites (ed.) S Somiya et al (Westerville: Am. Ceram. Soc.) pp. 15–43
10. Kloprogge J T, Ruan H D and Frost R L 2002 J. Mater. Sci. 37 112110.1023/A:1014303119055 ↗
11. Liu K C and Thomas G 1994 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 154510.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb09755.x ↗
12. Liu K C, Thomas G, Caballero A, Moya J S and De Aza S 1991 Ceramics Today — Tomorrow’s Ceramics, Material Sci. Monographs A66 177
13. Nurishi Y and Pask J A 1982 Ceram. Int. 8 5710.1016/0272-8842(82)90015-3 ↗
14. Okada K, Otsuka N and Somiya S 1991 Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 70 1633
15. Pask J A 1990 Mullite and mullite matrix composites (ed.) S Somiya et al (Westerville: Am. Ceram. Soc.) pp. 1–13
16. Pask J A, Dabbs D M and Sarikaya M 1991 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 234310.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06768.x ↗
17. Rezaie H R, Rainforth W M and Lee W E 1997 Br. Ceram. Trans. 96 181
18. Schneider H and Eberhard E 1990 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 207310.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05270.x ↗
19. Sainz M A, Serrano F J, Amigo J M, Bastida J and Caballero A 2000 J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 20 40310.1016/S0955-2219(99)00183-1 ↗
20. Viswabaskaran V, Gnanam F D and Balasubramanian M 2003 Ceram. Int. 29 56110.1016/S0272-8842(02)00203-1 ↗