Separation of matrix alloy and reinforcement from aluminum metal matrix composites scrap by salt flux addition
Source abstract
Abstract
Separation of matrix alloy and reinforcements from pure Al-SiCp composite scrap by salt flux addi- tion has been theoretically predicted using interface free energies. Experiments performed confirm the theore- tical prediction. Complete separation of matrix aluminum and reinforcement from metal matrix composites (MMCs) scrap has been achieved by addition of 2⋅05 wt% of equimolar mixture of NaCl-KCl salt flux with a metal and particle yield of 84 and 50%, respectively. By adding 5 wt% of NaF to equimolar mixture of NaCl- KCl, metal and particle yield improved to 91 and 73%, respectively. Reusability of both the matrix aluminum and the SiC separated from Al-SiCp scraps has been analysed using XRD, SEM and DTA techniques. The matrix alloy separated from Al-SiCp scraps can be used possibly as a low Si content Al-Si alloy. However, the inter- facial reaction that occurred during the fabrication of the composites had degraded the SiC particles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Bauxite Residue and Utilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Anson J P, Drew R A L and Gruzleski J E 1999 Met. Mater. Trans. B30 102710.1007/s11663-999-0108-4 ↗
2. Barsoum M W and Ownby P D 1981 Surfaces and interfaces in ceramic metals systems (New York: Plenum Press) p. 463
3. Chawla N and Chawla K K 2006 JOM 58 6710.1007/s11837-006-0231-5 ↗
4. Girifalco L A and Good R J 1957 J. Phys. Chem. 61 90410.1021/j150553a013 ↗
5. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1981 CRC Press, 66th edn. p. F–20
6. Ho F K and Sahai Y 1990 Light Met. 717
7. Laurent V, Chattain D and Eustathopoulos N 1987 J. Mater. Sci. 22 24410.1007/BF01160579 ↗
8. Lee J C, Seok H K and Lee H I 1999 Mater. Res. Bull. 34 3510.1016/S0025-5408(98)00215-3 ↗
9. Ohnishi T 1996 J. Jpn Inst. Light Met. 46 52510.2464/jilm.46.525 ↗
10. Roy R R and Sahai Y 1997 Mater. Trans. JIM 38 568
11. Roy R R and Utigard T A 1998 Met. Mater. Trans. B29 82110.1007/s11663-998-0141-8 ↗
12. Roy R R and Sahai Y 1998 Light metals (Warrendale, Pennsylvania: TMS Annual Meeting) pp 1237–1243
13. Schuster D M, Skibo M D, Bruski R S, Provencher R and Riverin G 1993 JOM 46 2610.1007/BF03223214 ↗
14. Silny A and Utigard T A 1997 Light Met. 871
15. Ye J and Sahai Y 1996 Mater. Trans. JIM 37 17510.2320/matertrans1989.37.175 ↗