Spray-drying of alumina powder for APS: effect of slurry properties and drying conditions upon particle size and morphology of feedstock
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, effects of variables concerning slurry properties and drying conditions on the particle size and morphology of feedstock were discussed. The results indicated that, the increase of powder loading increased D 50 and volume content but reduced recovery rate slightly. Other variables, such as inlet temperature, showed a maximum on the desired property. The particle size of resulting feedstock increased with the rise of feeding rate of slurry, however, decreased with the increase of atomization pressure based on the premise that atomization pressure was enough to force slurry to form the liquid membrane. For preparation of spherical feedstock, optimized variables were as follows: 60 wt.% powder in slurry, 2 wt.% PVA in slurry, inlet temperature of 60°C, atomization pressure of 13 × 103 KPa and feeding rate of 12 ml min−1. The volume content of feedstocks with 10–45 μm was above 65% and for D 50 it was 15·42 μm. In addition, according to the heat and mass transfer equation, the drying mechanism was established, which was well in agreement with the experimental results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Bertrand G, Roy P, Filiatre C and Coddet C 2005 Chem. Eng. Sci. 60 9510.1016/j.ces.2004.04.042 ↗
2. Cao X Q, Vassen R, Schwartz S, Jungen W, Tietz F and Stoever D 2000 J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 20 243310.1016/S0955-2219(00)00112-6 ↗
3. Davis J R (ed.) 2004 Handbook of thermal spray technology (Materials Park, OH, USA: ASM International) p. 163
4. Edlmayr V, Moser M, Walter C and Mitterer C 2010 Surf. Coat. Technol. 204 157610.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.10.002 ↗
5. Gretzinger J and Marshall W R Jr 1961 A.I.Ch.E.J. 7 31210.1002/aic.690070229 ↗
6. Hede P D, Bach P and Jensen A D 2008 Chem. Eng. Sci. 63 382110.1016/j.ces.2008.04.014 ↗
7. Kathrein M, Schintlmeister W, Wallgram W and Schleinkofer U 2003 Surf. Coat. Technol. 163 18110.1016/S0257-8972(02)00483-8 ↗
8. Keller N B, Bertrand G, Filiatre C, Meunier C and Coddet C 2003 Surf. Coat. Technol. 168 28110.1016/S0257-8972(03)00223-8 ↗
9. Kollenberg W and Decker J 1993 Fresen. J. Anal. Chem. 346 32710.1007/BF00321444 ↗
10. Liang H, Shinohara K, Minoshima H and Matsushima K 2001 Chem. Eng. Sci. 56 220510.1016/S0009-2509(00)00505-4 ↗
11. Mahdjouba H, Roya P, Filiatreb C, Bertranda G and Coddeta C 2003 J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 23 163710.1016/S0955-2219(02)00412-0 ↗
12. Roy P, Bertrand G and Coddet C 2005 Powder Technol. 157 2010.1016/j.powtec.2005.05.031 ↗
13. Walton D E and Mumford C J 1999 Trans. Chem. 77 452