Effect of substrate roughness on growth of diamond by hot filament CVD
Source abstract
Abstract
Polycrystalline diamond coatings are grown on Si (100) substrate by hot filament CVD technique. We investigate here the effect of substrate roughening on the substrate temperature and methane concentration required to maintain high quality, high growth rate and faceted morphology of the diamond coatings. It has been shown that as we increase the substrate roughness from 0.05 mu m to 0.91 mu m (centre line average or CLA) there is enhancement in deposited film quality (Raman peak intensity ratio of sp (3) to non-sp (3) content increases from 1.65 to 7.13) and the substrate temperature can be brought down to 640A degrees C without any additional substrate heating. The coatings grown at adverse conditions for sp (3) deposition has cauliflower morphology with nanocrystalline grains and coatings grown under favourable sp (3) condition gives clear faceted grains.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Amorim A, Nascente P A P, Trava-Airoldi V J, Corat E J, Alves A R and Moro J R 2009 Vacuum 83 105410.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.013 ↗
2. Butler J E and Woodin R L 1993 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A342 209
3. Butler J E and Sumant A V 2008 Chem. Vap. Depos. 14 14510.1002/cvde.200700037 ↗
4. Chang C P, Flamn D L, Ibbotson D E and Mucha J A 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 63 174410.1063/1.339912 ↗
5. Das D and Singh R N 2007 Int. Mater. Rev. 52 2910.1179/174328007X160245 ↗
6. Gruen Dieter M 1999 Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 29 21110.1146/annurev.matsci.29.1.211 ↗
7. Feng Z, Komvipoulos K, Brown I G and Bogy D B 1993 J. Appl. Phys. 74 284110.1063/1.354636 ↗
8. Hirabayashi K et al 1988 Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 181510.1063/1.99789 ↗
9. Jansen F, Machonkin M A and Kuhman D E 1990 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8 378510.1116/1.576494 ↗
10. Kama M, Sato Y, Matsumoto S and Setaha N 1983 J. Cryst. Growth 62 64210.1016/0022-0248(83)90411-6 ↗
11. Kobashi K, Nishimura K, Miyata K, Kumagai K and Nakaue A 1990 J. Mater. Res. 5 246910.1557/JMR.1990.2469 ↗
12. Kondoh K, Ohta T, Mitomo T and Ohtsuka K 1994 Diam. Rel. Mater. 3 27010.1016/0925-9635(94)90091-4 ↗
13. Lee S T, Lin Z and Jiang X 1999 Mater. Sci. & Eng. R25 12310.1016/S0927-796X(99)00003-0 ↗
14. Lin S J et al 1992 Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 155910.1063/1.107250 ↗
15. Matsumoto S 1982 J. Mater. Sci. 17 310610.1007/BF01203472 ↗
16. Mitsuda K, Kojima Y, Yoshida T and Akashi K 1987 J. Mater. Sci. 22 155710.1007/BF01132374 ↗
17. Narayan J, Godbole V P, Matera G and Singh R K 1992 J. Appl. Phys. 71 96610.1063/1.351322 ↗
18. May Paul W 2000 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A358 473
19. Popovici Galina and Prelas M A 1992 Phys. Status Solidi 132 23310.1002/pssa.2211320202 ↗
20. Sarangi S K, Chattopadhyay A and Chattopadhyay A K 2008 Appl. Surf. Sci. 254 372110.1016/j.apsusc.2007.10.104 ↗
21. Shenderova O, Hens S and McGuire G 2010 Dia. Rel. Mater. 19 26010.1016/j.diamond.2009.10.008 ↗
22. Stoner B R, Ma G H M, Wolter S D and Glass J T 1992 Phys. Rev. B45 1106710.1103/PhysRevB.45.11067 ↗
23. Suzulu K, Swabe A, Yasuda H and Inuzuka T 1995 Appl. Phys. Lett. 66 190010.1063/1.113315 ↗
24. Takahashi H, Kamiya S and Saka M 2002 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85 17910.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00063.x ↗
25. Wang A, Sun C, Huang R, Wen L, Cailiao Kexue and Yu Jishu 2003 J. Mater. Sci. & Technol., China, USA 19 22