Microstructure and properties of Ti–Nb–V–Mo-alloyed high chromium cast iron
Source abstract
Abstract
The correlations of microstructure, hardness and fracture toughness of high chromium cast iron with the addition of alloys (titanium, vanadium, niobium and molybdenum) were investigated. The results indicated that the as-cast microstructure changed from hypereutectic, eutectic to hypoeutectic with the increase of alloy contents. Mo dissolved in austenite and increased the hardness by solid solution strengthening. TiC and NbC mainly existed in austenite and impeded the austenite dendrite development. V existed in multicomponent systems in forms of V alloy compounds (VCrFe8 and VCr2C2). With the increase of alloy additions, carbides size changed gradually from refinement to coarseness, hardness and impact toughness were increased and then decreased. Compared with the fracture toughness (6 J/cm2) and hardness (50·8HRC) without any alloy addition, the toughness and hardness at 0·60 V–0·60Ti–0·60Nb–0·35Mo (wt%) additions were improved and achieved to 11 J/cm2 and 58·9HRC, respectively. The synergistic roles of Ti, Nb, V and Mo influenced the solidification behaviour of alloy. The refinement of microstructure and improvement of carbides morphologies, size and distribution improved the impact toughness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Advanced materials and composites · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Bedolla-Jacuinde A, Correa R and Mej I 2007 Wear 263 80810.1016/j.wear.2006.12.011 ↗
2. Chunga R J, Tanga X and Dolman K 2009 Wear 267 502
3. Dai Y, Yang M and Song C 2010 Mater. Charact. 61 11610.1016/j.matchar.2009.11.001 ↗
4. Dupin P, Saverna J and Schissler J M 1982 AFS Trans. 90 711
5. Filipovic M, Kamberovic Z and Korac M 2011 Mater. Trans. 52 38610.2320/matertrans.M2010059 ↗
6. Fiset M, Peev K and Radulovic M 1993 J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 12 61510.1007/BF00465569 ↗
7. Inthidech S and Boonmak K 2010 Mater. Trans. 511 264
8. Izciler M and Celik H 2000 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 105 23710.1016/S0924-0136(00)00550-1 ↗
9. Labrecque C and Gagne M 1998 Canadian Metal. Quart. 37 34310.1016/S0008-4433(98)00031-7 ↗
10. Li F, Qijie Z and Guanghua Z 1996 Acta Metall. Sinica 32 159
11. Liu H and Wang J 2007 Mater. Des. 28 105910.1016/j.matdes.2005.09.007 ↗
12. Lu L, Soda H and McLean A 2003 Mater. Sci. Eng. A347 21410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00588-9 ↗
13. Mousavi Anijdan S H and Bahrami A 2007 Mater. Sci. Eng. A454 62310.1016/j.msea.2006.11.128 ↗
14. Ogi K, Matsubara Y and Matsuda K 1982 AFS Trans. 89 197
15. Powell G L F 1980 Metals Form. 3 37
16. Qingyu H, Zhenyi H and Jingtao W 2009 J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 16 33
17. Qu Y, Xing J and Zhi X 2008 Mater. Lett. 62 302410.1016/j.matlet.2008.01.129 ↗
18. Shijian H 1993 High chromium wear resistance cast iron (Beijing: Coal Industry Press)
19. Xie G, Sheng H and Han J 2010 Mater. Des. 31 306210.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.014 ↗
20. Zhi X, Xing J and Fu H 2008a Mater. Lett. 62 85710.1016/j.matlet.2007.06.084 ↗
21. Zhi X, Xing J and Fu H 2008b Mater. Charact. 59 122110.1016/j.matchar.2007.10.010 ↗
22. Zhi X, Xing J and Fu H 2008c Materialwiss. Werkst 39 39110.1002/mawe.200700219 ↗
23. Zhou D and Wang G 1988 Hot Work. Technol. 5 3