Upconversion emission of BaTiO3: Er nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Here, we report the dopant concentration and pump-power dependence upconversion emission properties of erbium doped BaTiO3 nanocrystals derived from sol-emulsion-gel method. Green (550 nm) and red (670 nm) upconversion emissions were observed at room temperature from the 4S3/2 and 4F9/2 levels of Er3+: BaTiO3 nanocrystals. It is found that at 850 mW of cw excitation power (at 980 nm) the total luminescence was 17130 Cd/m2 for 1000°C heated 0.25 mol% Er-doped BaTiO3 nanocrystals. It is worthwhile to mention that the unusual power-dependent upconversion luminescence (saturation) is observed at higher dopant concentration (2.5 mol%) and high pump power. Our analysis confirms that the depletion of the excited state is responsible for the relevant fluorescence upconversion. We have again confirmed that a twophoton excited state absorption process occurs for all samples.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Dowing E, Hesselink L, Ralston J and Macfarlane R 1996 Science 273 118510.1126/science.273.5279.1185 ↗
2. Guo H, Dong N, Yin M, Zhang W, Lou L and Xia S 2004 J. Phys. Chem. B108 1920510.1021/jp048072q ↗
3. La Rosa-Cruz E De, Diaz-Torres L A, Rodriguez-Rojas R A, Meneses-Nava M A, Barbosa-Garcia O and Salas P 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 490310.1063/1.1632020 ↗
4. La Rosa E De, Salas P, Desirena H, Angeles C and Rodriguez R A 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 24191210.1063/1.2143131 ↗
5. Matsuura D 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 452610.1063/1.1527976 ↗
6. Pandozzi F, Vetrone F, Boyer J C, Naccache R, Capobianco J A, Speghini A and Bettinelli M 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B109 1740010.1021/jp052192w ↗
7. Patra A, Friend C S, Kapoor R and Prasad P N 2002 J. Phys. Chem. B106 190910.1021/jp013576z ↗
8. Patra A, Friend C S, Kapoor R and Prasad P N 2003a Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 28410.1063/1.1592891 ↗
9. Patra A, Friend C S, Kapoor R and Prasad P N 2003b Chem. Mater. 15 365010.1021/cm020897u ↗
10. Pollnau M, Gamelin D R, Luthi S R, Gudel H U and Hehlen M P 2000 Phys. Rev. B61 333710.1103/PhysRevB.61.3337 ↗
11. Quimby R S, Miniscalco W J and Thompson B 1994 J. Appl. Phys. 76 447210.1063/1.357278 ↗
12. Silver J, Martinez-Rubio M I, Ireland T G, Fern G R and Withnall R 2001 J. Phys. Chem. B105 94810.1021/jp002778c ↗
13. Silversmith A J, Lenth W and Macfarlane R M 1987 Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 197710.1063/1.98316 ↗
14. Singh S and Geusic J E 1966 Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 86510.1103/PhysRevLett.17.865 ↗