Structural analysis of Ni nanoparticles in thermal cooling by molecular dynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
The Sutton–Chen potential was used to simulate the process of solidification of Ni nanoparticles at temperatures ranging from 1000 to 100 K in the cooling process. The number of atoms per particle ranged from 500 to 4000. The results show an expected increase in solidification temperature with size. Analysis of the first-neighbour interatomic distance as a function of temperature showed exponential behaviour up to the phase transition. A reduction in the interatomic distance was observed at small sizes below the established lattice parameter. Characterization of the surface as a function of the number of first neighbours allowed interpretation and quantification of the surface planes as a function of particle size at low temperatures.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Material Dynamics and Properties · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Lei D, Wangyu H, Huiqiu D and Shifang X 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 1102610.1021/jp100194p ↗
2. Elena L, Alexander E, Daniel R, Irina B and Graeme M 2010 Comput. Mater. Sci. 47 71210.1016/j.commatsci.2009.10.014 ↗
3. Aili W, Hengbo Y, Min R, Huihong L, Jinjuan X and Tingshung J 2010 New J. Chem. 34 70810.1039/b9nj00657e ↗
4. Yu M, Olga B and Maxim K 2011 Inorg. Mater. 47 3610.1134/S0020168511010158 ↗
5. Yunjun R, Chundong W and Jianjun J 2016 J. Mater. Chem. A 4 1450910.1039/C6TA05104A ↗
6. Lucie G, He Z, Jean-François C, Dominique S, Fabio M and Olivier D 2015 Nano-Struct. Opt. Photonics 42 497
7. Mohammad R A, Vahhab S and Ali M 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 1262710.1038/s41598-020-69679-4 ↗
8. Yusuke W, Yasushi S and Toshio S 2010 ISIJ Int. 50 115810.2355/isijinternational.50.1158 ↗
9. Shin-Pon J, I-Jui L and Hsing-Yin C 2020 J. Alloys Compd. 858 15768110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157681 ↗
10. Yasushi S and Toshio S 200 J. Chem. Phys.129 144102
11. Kien P and Hung K Hung 2019 Int. J. Mod. Phys.33 195022210.1142/S0217979219502229 ↗
12. Lin Z 2019 Adv. Eng. Mater. 21 180053110.1002/adem.201800531 ↗
13. Michal K, Karolina J, Andrzej B and Aleksander B 2020 J. Appl. Cryst. 53 110.1107/S1600576719014511 ↗
14. Trong N, Chinh N and Vinh T 2017 RSC Adv. 7 2540610.1039/C6RA27841H ↗
15. Sutton A and Chen J 1990 Philos. Mag. Lett. 61 13910.1080/09500839008206493 ↗
16. Toshitaka I, Kenichi Y and Kunio A 2016 Nanomater. 6 17210.3390/nano6090172 ↗
17. Yoshitaka K, Yue Q, Tahir C and William G 1998 CALTECH
18. Marc H 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 599410.1039/C6CP08606C ↗
19. Alarifi H, Atiş M, Özdoğan C, Hu A, Yavuz M and Zhou Y 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 1228910.1021/jp311541c ↗
20. Yuwen Z, Yonghe D, Qingfeng Z, Dadong W, Heping Z, Ming G et al 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 11660110.1088/1674-1056/aba2dd ↗
21. We-Bing Z, Chuan C and Shun-Ying Z 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 2127410.1021/jp404569m ↗
22. Alexander M, Pavel S and Anna S 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 1789510.1039/C6CP07571A ↗