journal article·2023-10-09

Structural analysis of Ni nanoparticles in thermal cooling by molecular dynamics

J D Agudelo-Giraldo, D F Arias-Mateus, M M Gomez-Hermida, H Reyes-Pineda

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The Sutton–Chen potential was used to simulate the process of solidification of Ni nanoparticles at temperatures ranging from 1000 to 100 K in the cooling process. The number of atoms per particle ranged from 500 to 4000. The results show an expected increase in solidification temperature with size. Analysis of the first-neighbour interatomic distance as a function of temperature showed exponential behaviour up to the phase transition. A reduction in the interatomic distance was observed at small sizes below the established lattice parameter. Characterization of the surface as a function of the number of first neighbours allowed interpretation and quantification of the surface planes as a function of particle size at low temperatures.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Material Dynamics and Properties · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Lei D, Wangyu H, Huiqiu D and Shifang X 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 1102610.1021/jp100194p ↗
2. Elena L, Alexander E, Daniel R, Irina B and Graeme M 2010 Comput. Mater. Sci. 47 71210.1016/j.commatsci.2009.10.014 ↗
3. Aili W, Hengbo Y, Min R, Huihong L, Jinjuan X and Tingshung J 2010 New J. Chem. 34 70810.1039/b9nj00657e ↗
4. Yu M, Olga B and Maxim K 2011 Inorg. Mater. 47 3610.1134/S0020168511010158 ↗
5. Yunjun R, Chundong W and Jianjun J 2016 J. Mater. Chem. A 4 1450910.1039/C6TA05104A ↗
6. Lucie G, He Z, Jean-François C, Dominique S, Fabio M and Olivier D 2015 Nano-Struct. Opt. Photonics 42 497
7. Mohammad R A, Vahhab S and Ali M 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 1262710.1038/s41598-020-69679-4 ↗
8. Yusuke W, Yasushi S and Toshio S 2010 ISIJ Int. 50 115810.2355/isijinternational.50.1158 ↗
9. Shin-Pon J, I-Jui L and Hsing-Yin C 2020 J. Alloys Compd. 858 15768110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157681 ↗
10. Yasushi S and Toshio S 200 J. Chem. Phys.129 144102
11. Kien P and Hung K Hung 2019 Int. J. Mod. Phys.33 195022210.1142/S0217979219502229 ↗
12. Lin Z 2019 Adv. Eng. Mater. 21 180053110.1002/adem.201800531 ↗
13. Michal K, Karolina J, Andrzej B and Aleksander B 2020 J. Appl. Cryst. 53 110.1107/S1600576719014511 ↗
14. Trong N, Chinh N and Vinh T 2017 RSC Adv. 7 2540610.1039/C6RA27841H ↗
15. Sutton A and Chen J 1990 Philos. Mag. Lett. 61 13910.1080/09500839008206493 ↗
16. Toshitaka I, Kenichi Y and Kunio A 2016 Nanomater. 6 17210.3390/nano6090172 ↗
17. Yoshitaka K, Yue Q, Tahir C and William G 1998 CALTECH
18. Marc H 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 599410.1039/C6CP08606C ↗
19. Alarifi H, Atiş M, Özdoğan C, Hu A, Yavuz M and Zhou Y 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 1228910.1021/jp311541c ↗
20. Yuwen Z, Yonghe D, Qingfeng Z, Dadong W, Heping Z, Ming G et al 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 11660110.1088/1674-1056/aba2dd ↗
21. We-Bing Z, Chuan C and Shun-Ying Z 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 2127410.1021/jp404569m ↗
22. Alexander M, Pavel S and Anna S 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 1789510.1039/C6CP07571A ↗