Synthesis, characterization and electrochemical impedance study of CdS quantum dot-sensitized solar cell with reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 composite photoanode
Source abstract
Abstract
Quantum dots and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) play an important role in the performance of the third-generation solar cell. In this work, the performance of quantum dot-sensitized solar cell (QDSSC) with rGO/TiO2 composite photoanode is presented. Mixing of rGO was performed with a facile preparation technique by varying the ratio of rGO (0.1–1.0 wt%) to TiO2. The prepared electrode samples were characterized in order to understand the effect of rGO to the surface morphology, chemical composition and electron lifetime effect. It was observed that the addition of rGO increased the efficiency of QDSSC with maximum efficiency observed for sample having 0.5 wt% of rGO-added TiO2 electrodes. However, more rGO content did not contribute to the improved performance due to increased charge recombination rate. The internal resistance and electron lifetime of the samples are further discussed in this work.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Robel I, Kuno M and Kamat P V 2007 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 413610.1021/ja070099a ↗
2. Jun H K, Careem M A and Arof A K 2014 J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 6 110.1063/1.4870996 ↗
3. Sahu A, Garg A and Dixit A 2020 Sol. Energy 203 21010.1016/j.solener.2020.04.044 ↗
4. Pan A, Rao H, Mora-Seró I, Bisquert J and Zhong X 2018 Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 765910.1039/C8CS00431E ↗
5. Rasal A S, Yadav S, Kashale A A, Altaee A and Chang J-Y 2022 Nano Energy 94 10685410.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106854 ↗
6. Gopi C V V M, Venkata-Haritha M, Kim S K and Kim H J 2016 J. Power Sources 311 11110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.039 ↗
7. Huang P, Xu S, Zhang M, Zhong W, Xiao Z and Luo Y 2020 Opt. Mater. 110 11053510.1016/j.optmat.2020.110535 ↗
8. Ganguly A and Nath S S 2020 Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid State Mater. Adv. Technol. 255 11453210.1016/j.mseb.2020.114532 ↗
9. Elibol E 2020 Sol. Energy 206 74110.1016/j.solener.2020.06.002 ↗
10. Deng J, Li L, Gou Y, Fang J, Feng R, Lei Y et al 2020 Electrochim. Acta 356 13684510.1016/j.electacta.2020.136845 ↗
11. Jung E S, Basit M A, Abbas M A, Ali I, Kim D W, Park Y M et al 2020 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 218 11075310.1016/j.solmat.2020.110753 ↗
12. Chakrapani V, Tvrdy K and Kamat P V 2010 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 122810.1021/ja909663r ↗
13. Akash S, Shwetharani R, Kusuma J, Akhil S and Balakrishna R G 2022 J. Alloys Compd. 897 16274010.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162740 ↗
14. Mora-Seró I, Giménez S, Fabregat-Santiago F, Gómez R, Shen Q, Toyoda T et al 2009 Acc. Chem. Res. 42 184810.1021/ar900134d ↗
15. Tung H T, Thao N T and Vinh L Q 2018 Int. J. Photoenergy 2018 854520710.1155/2018/8545207 ↗
16. Song H, Lin Y, Zhang Z, Rao H, Wang W, Fang Y et al 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 479010.1021/jacs.1c01214 ↗
17. Ouyang J 2019 Nano Mater. Sci. 1 7710.1016/j.nanoms.2019.03.004 ↗
18. Archana T, Sreelekshmi S, Subashini G, Nirmala Grace A, Arivanandhan M and Jayavel R 2021 Int. J. Energy Res. 45 1587910.1002/er.6821 ↗
19. Mahmoudi T, Wang Y and Hahn Y B 2018 Nano Energy 47 5110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.047 ↗
20. Zhao J, Wu J, Zheng M, Huo J and Tu Y 2015 Electrochim. Acta 156 26110.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.045 ↗
21. Wang L, Feng J, Tong Y and Liang J 2019 Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44 12810.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.155 ↗
22. Surana K, Mehra R M and Bhattacharya B 2020 Opt. Mater. 107 11009210.1016/j.optmat.2020.110092 ↗
23. Sopyan I and Hafizah N 2009 Int. J. Photoenergy 2009 962783
24. Tung H T, Van Thuan D, Kiat J H and Phuc D H 2019 Appl. Phys. A 125 50510.1007/s00339-019-2797-0 ↗
25. Thamaphat K, Limsuwan P and Ngotawornchai B 2008 Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 42 357
26. Patil G P, Bagal V S, Suryawanshi S R, Late D J, More M A and Chavan P G 2016 Appl. Phys. A 122 56010.1007/s00339-016-0090-z ↗
27. Aqeel M, Anjum S, Imran M, Ikram N, Majeed H, Naz M et al 2019 Mater. Res. Express 6 08621510.1088/2053-1591/ab244a ↗
28. Archana T, Vijayakumar K, Subashini G, Nirmala Grace A, Arivanandhan M and Jayavel R 2020 Mater. Res. Express 7 01552810.1088/2053-1591/ab67f9 ↗
29. Dang C L T, Le C V, Trung N T, Nguyen M T T, Tran D C, Pham K T et al 2021 Synth. Met. 281 11691910.1016/j.synthmet.2021.116919 ↗
30. Katta V S, Das K R, Cilaveni G, Pulipaka S, Veerappan G, Ramasamy E et al 2021 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 22010.1016/j.solmat.2020.110843 ↗
31. Kokal R K, Raavi S and Deepa M 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 1839510.1021/acsami.9b01792 ↗
32. Daulay S, Madsuha A F, Rosa E S and Yuwono A H 2019 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1402 05510110.1088/1742-6596/1402/5/055101 ↗
33. Jiang J, Wang K, Liu Q and Zhai J 2016 RSC Adv. 6 9956410.1039/C6RA15937K ↗
34. Zhang C, Liu S, Liu X, Deng F, Xiong Y and Tsai F-C 2018 R. Soc. Open Sci. 5 17171210.1098/rsos.171712 ↗
35. Bisquert J, Fabregat-Santiago F, Mora-Seró I, Garcia-Belmonte G and Giménez S 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 1727810.1021/jp9037649 ↗