Characterizing interphase region in CNT/nylon-6 composites using molecular dynamics simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
The load transfer mechanisms and effective mechanical properties of carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced polymer nanocomposites are strongly influenced by the interfacial region (interphase) between the embedded CNT and the polymer. In this article, elastic properties of an effective interphase present in nanocomposites are evaluated from molecular dynamics (MD) simulation studies of individual CNT, the polymer and the CNT/polymer nanocomposite. Different configurations of single-walled CNT are embedded in a nylon-6 matrix at different volume fractions of the CNT and the mechanical properties of the nanocomposites are evaluated. Subsequently, the elastic modulus of the interphase is evaluated using an inverse three-phase rule of mixtures, in which the volume fraction of the interfacial region is calculated based on the equilibrium van der Waals distance between the CNT and the polymer matrix. Based on the MD simulation results, a semi-empirical model has been developed to predict the effective interphase modulus for its applicability in continuum modelling of nanocomposites.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · Nanotechnology research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Coleman J N, Khan U, Blau W J and Gun’ko Y K 2006 Carbon 44 162410.1016/j.carbon.2006.02.038 ↗
2. Qian D, Dickey E C, Andrews R and Rantell T 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 286810.1063/1.126500 ↗
3. Chen X L and Liu Y J 2004 Comput. Mater. Sci. 29 110.1016/S0927-0256(03)00090-9 ↗
4. Chwał M and Muc A 2016 Compos. B Eng. 88 29510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.009 ↗
5. Frankland S J V and Harik V M 2003 Surf. Sci. 525 L10310.1016/S0039-6028(02)02532-3 ↗
6. Barber A H, Cohen S R, Keing S and Wagner H D 2004 Comp. Sci. Tech. 64 228310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.023 ↗
7. Haque A and Ramasetty A 2005 Compos. Struct. 71 6810.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.029 ↗
8. Chowdhury S C and Okabe T 2007 Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 38 74710.1016/j.compositesa.2006.09.011 ↗
9. Shokrieh M M and Rafiee R 2010 Compos. Struct. 92 64710.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.033 ↗
10. Han F, Azdoud Y and Lubineau G 2014 Comput. Mater. Sci. 81 64110.1016/j.commatsci.2013.07.036 ↗
11. Amraei J, Jam J E, Arab B and Firouz-Abadi R D 2019 Polym. Compos. 40 E121910.1002/pc.24950 ↗
12. Han Y and Elliott J 2007 Comput. Mater. Sci. 39 31510.1016/j.commatsci.2006.06.011 ↗
13. Gohil P and Shaikh A A 2009 J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 29 68510.1177/0731684408100268 ↗
14. Bhuiyan M A, Pucha R V, Karevan M and Kalaitzidou K 2011 Comput. Mater. Sci. 50 234710.1016/j.commatsci.2011.03.009 ↗
15. Arash B, Wang Q and Varadan V K 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 110.1038/srep06479 ↗
16. Banerjee D, Nguyen T and Chuang T J 2016 Comput. Mater. Sci. 114 20910.1016/j.commatsci.2015.12.026 ↗
17. Malekimoghadam R and Icardi U 2019 Compos. B Eng. 177 10740510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107405 ↗
18. Guru K, Sharma T, Shukla K K and Mishra S B 2016 J. Nanomech. Micromech. 6 0401600410.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.0000109 ↗
19. Farazin A and Mohammadimehr M 2020 Adv. Nano Res. 9 83
20. WenXing B, ChangChun Z and WanZhao C 2004 Physica B 352 15610.1016/j.physb.2004.07.005 ↗
21. Vodenitcharova T and Zhang L C 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 16540110.1103/PhysRevB.68.165401 ↗
22. Tsai J L, Tzeng S H and Chiu Y T 2010 Compos. B Eng. 41 10610.1016/j.compositesb.2009.06.003 ↗
23. Herasati S, Zhang L C and Ruan H H 2014 Int. J. Solids Struct. 51 178110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.01.019 ↗
24. Rafiee R and Pourazizi R 2015 Comput. Mater. Sci. 96 57310.1016/j.commatsci.2014.03.056 ↗