Influence of the concentration of carbon nanotubes on electrical conductivity of magnetically aligned MWCNT–polypyrrole composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The goal of this work is to study the effect of high magnetic pulses on electrical property of carbon nanotube–polypyrrole (CNT–PPy) composites with different CNT concentrations. CNT–PPy composites are produced in fractions of 1, 5 and 9 wt%. During the polymerization process, the CNTs are homogeneously dispersed throughout the polymer matrix in an ultrasonic bath. Nanocomposite rods are prepared. After exposure to 30 magnetic pulses, the resistivity of the rods is measured. The surface conductivity of thin tablets of composites is studied by 4-probe technique. The magnitude of the pulsed magnetic field is 10 Tesla with time duration of 1.5 ms. The results show that after applying 30 magnetic pulses, the electrical resistivity of the composites decreases depending on the concentration of CNTs in the composites. The orientation of CNTs is probed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) technique. AFM images approved alignment of CNT–polymer fibres in the magnetic field. We found that the enhancement in the electrical properties of CNT–PPy composites is due to rearrangement and alignment of CNTs in a high magnetic field. The stability of nano-composites is studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Vaghar M R, Li L, Eyssa Y, Schneider-Muntau H J and Kratz R 2004 in: Megagauss Magnetic Field Generation, Its Application to Science and Ultra-High Pulsed-Power Technology; Proceedings to the VIIIth International Conference on Megagauss Magnetic Field Generation and Related Topics (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.) p 124–12710.1142/9789812702517_0022 ↗
2. Novickij J, Kačianauskas R, Filipavičius V, Tolutis R, Balevičius S and žurauskienė N 2004 Electron. Electr. Eng. Technol. 7 19
3. Khosla A and Gray B L 2009 Mater. Lett. 63 120310.1016/j.matlet.2009.02.043 ↗
4. Robel I, Bunker B A and Kamat P V 2005 Adv. Mater. 17 245810.1002/adma.200500418 ↗
5. Takeyama S, Nakamura S and Uchida K 2006 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 51 44610.1088/1742-6596/51/1/102 ↗
6. Klinovaja J, Schmidt M J, Braunecker B and Loss D 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 8545210.1103/PhysRevB.84.085452 ↗
7. Camponeschi E, Vance R, Al-Haik M, Garmestani H and Tannenbaum R 2007 Carbon N. Y. 45 203710.1016/j.carbon.2007.05.024 ↗
8. Jang B K and Sakka Y 2009 Mater. Lett. 63 254510.1016/j.matlet.2009.08.060 ↗
9. Nanni F, Mayoral B L, Madau F, Montesperelli G and McNally T 2012 Compos. Sci. Technol. 72 114010.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.015 ↗
10. Wang Q, Dai J, Li W, Wei Z and Jiang J 2008 Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 164410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.024 ↗
11. Shaver J, Parra-Vasquez A N G, Hansel S, Portugall O, Mielke C H, von Ortenberg M, Hauge R H, Pasquali M and Kono J 2008 ACS Nano 3 13110.1021/nn800519n ↗
12. Yamamoto M, Koshino M and Ando T 2008 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 77 08470510.1143/JPSJ.77.084705 ↗
13. Walters D A, Casavant M J, Qin X C, Huffman C B, Boul P J, Ericson L M, Haroz E H, O’Connell M J, Smith K, Colbert D T and Smalley R E 2001 Chem. Phys. Lett. 338 1410.1016/S0009-2614(01)00072-0 ↗
14. Islam M F, Milkie D E, Torrens O N, Yodh A G and Kikkawa J M 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 20140110.1103/PhysRevB.71.201401 ↗
15. Yan Y, Chan-Park M B and Zhang Q 2007 Small 3 2410.1002/smll.200600354 ↗
16. Kimura T, Ago H, Tobita M, Ohshima S, Kyotani M and Yumura M 2002 Adv. Mater. 14 138010.1002/1521-4095(20021002)14:19<1380::AID-ADMA1380>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
17. Xie X, Mai Y and Zhou X 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng. R Reports 49 8910.1016/j.mser.2005.04.002 ↗
18. Choi E S, Brooks J S, Eaton D L, Al-Haik M S, Hussaini M Y, Garmestani H, Li D and Dahmen K 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 94 603410.1063/1.1616638 ↗
19. Kono J, Nicholas R J and Roche S 2008 in: Carbon Nanotub. SE—13 (eds) A Jorio, G Dresselhau and M Dresselhaus (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer) p 393–42210.1007/978-3-540-72865-8_13 ↗
20. Lu J P 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 112310.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1123 ↗
21. Bonard J, Stora T, Salvetat J, Maier F, Stöckli T, Duschl C, Forró L, de Heer W A and Châtelain A 1997 Adv. Mater. 9 82710.1002/adma.19970091014 ↗
22. Jang B K, Sakka Y and Woo S K 2009 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 156 1200510.1088/1742-6596/156/1/012005 ↗
23. Sharma A, Tripathi B and Vijay Y K 2010 J. Memb. Sci. 361 8910.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.005 ↗
24. Ajiki H and Ando T 1996 Phys. B Condens. Matter 216 35810.1016/0921-4526(95)00517-X ↗
25. Kazemikia K, Bonabi F, Asadpoorchallo A and Shokrzadeh M 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 02510910.1063/1.4907772 ↗
26. Vanacken J, Liang L, Rosseel K, Boon W and Herlach F 2001 Phys. B Condens. Matter 294–295 67410.1016/S0921-4526(00)00742-0 ↗
27. Li X, Ren Z and Fautrelle Y 2009 Mater. Lett. 63 123510.1016/j.matlet.2009.02.030 ↗
28. Svoboda J 2004 Magnetic techniques for the treatment of materials (Springer) (London: Kluwer Academic Publishers)