Characterization and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of cross-linked chitosan films as implant for controlled release of citalopram
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to develop cross-linked chitosan (CH) films that can release drug over an extended period of time and that too in a controlled manner. A solution of different percentages of CH, is prepared in 1% lactic acid, followed by addition of citalopram (CTP) and then reacted with increasing amounts of glutaraldehyde (GL) to obtain films with different cross-linking densities. Prepared films are characterized for their physical and mechanical properties. The films are then subjected to in vitro drug release studies using pH 7·4 phosphate buffer saline (PBS) as dissolution medium and cumulative amount of drug released is calculated. Kinetic analysis of drug release is performed using Power law model and Higuchi’s model. With increase in concentration of CH, water absorption capacity and mechanical strength are increased; whereas, water vapour permeability and elasticity of the films are decreased. The effect of cross-linking agent, GL, is such that with an increase in the amount of GL, water vapour permeability, water absorption capacity and elasticity of the films are decreased; whereas, mechanical strength increased to some extent and then decreased. In vitro release studies indicate that films containing 3% CH, cross-linked with 2–3% GL and films containing 4% CH, cross-linked 1% GL are able to sustain the drug release for a prolonged time along with releasing almost complete drug in a desired period. Out of these batches, films containing 3% CH, cross-linked with 2–3% GL are having sufficient strength, water vapour permeation, water absorption capacity and elongation at break for implantation purpose. The in vitro degradation studies and histopathological studies were carried out with a sample film (batch C3 as in table 1) in rabbit model. In vitro degradation study indicates that the films maintained their integrity for desired implantation. The histopathological studies under optical microscope indicates that on implanting, there is no evidence of any inflammation, any foreign body granuloma or any necrosis or hemorrhage. Tissue configuration remains unaltered after 30 days of implantation. So, it can be suggested that cross-linked CH films of above said composition can be used as implant for long term application in depression and related disorders.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Adriano W S, Filho E H C, Silva J A and Goncalves L R B 2005 Biotech. Appl. Biochem. 41201
2. Andrews J M and Nemeroff C B 1994 Am. J. Med. 9724S
3. Arvanitoyannis I, Nakayama A and Aiba S 1998 Carbohydr. Polym. 37371
4. Bayramocglu G, Yylmaz M and Aryca M Y 2003 Biochem. Eng. J. 1335
5. Beppu M M, Arruda E J, Vieira R S and Santos N N 2004 J. Membr. Sci. 240 22710.1016/j.memsci.2004.04.025 ↗
6. Beppu M M, Vieira R S, Aimoli C G and Santana C C 2007 J. Membr. Sci. 301 12610.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.015 ↗
7. Blanco M D, Gomez C and Olmo R 2000 Int. J. Pharm. 202 2910.1016/S0378-5173(00)00408-7 ↗
8. Crini G 2006 Bioresour. Technol. 971061
9. David P, Manssur Y and Mark S 1992 Carbohydr. Res. 237 32510.1016/S0008-6215(92)84256-R ↗
10. Frazer A 1997 J. Clin. Psychiat. 589
11. Genta I, Constantini M, Asti A, Conti B and Montanari L 1998 Carbohydr. Polym. 3681
12. Gliko-Kabir B, Yagen A, Penhasi A and Rubinstein A 2000 J. Control. Rel. 63121
13. Guibal E 2004 Sep. Purif. Technol. 3843
14. Gupta K C and Kumar M N V R 2000 Biomaterials 201115
15. Higuchi T 1963 J. Pharm. Sci. 521145
16. Jameela S R and Jayakrishnan A 1995 Biomaterials 16769
17. Jameela S R, Misra A and Jayakrishnan A 1994 J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Edn. 6 62110.1163/156856294X00563 ↗
18. Jameela S R, Kumary Y V, Lal A V and Jayakrishnan A 1998 J. Control Rel. 5217
19. Kalapathy U, Proctor A and Shultz J 2000 Bioresour. Technol. 7299
20. Korsmeyer R W, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P and Peppas N A 1983 J. Pharm. Sci. 72 118910.1002/jps.2600721021 ↗
21. Miao Y Q and Tan S N 2000 Analyst 125 159110.1039/b003483p ↗
22. Mi F L, Shyu S S and Wu Y B 2001 Biomaterials 22165
23. Miyazaki S, Ishii K and Nadai T 1981 Chem. Pharm. Bull. 293067
24. Muzzarelli R A 1993 Carbohydr. Polym. 207
25. Ngah W S W, Endud C S and Mayanar R 2002 React. Funct. Polym. 50181
26. Preskorn S H 1995 J. Clin. Psychiat. 5612
27. Remunan-Lopez C and Bodmeier R 1997 J. Control. Rel. 44215
28. Rickels K and Schweizer E 1990 J. Clin. Psychiat. 519
29. Sezer A G, Hatipoglu F, Cevher E, Oğurtan Z, Bas A L and Akbuğa J 2007 AAPS PharmSciTech. 8 E9410.1208/pt0802039 ↗
30. Shu X Z, Zhu K J and Weihong S 2001 Int. J. Pharm. 212 1910.1016/S0378-5173(00)00582-2 ↗
31. Thomas C and Sharma P 1990 Biomater. Artif. Cells Artif. Org. 181
32. Tomihata K and Ikada Y 1997 Biomaterials 18567
33. Vieira R S and Beppu M M 2005 Adsorption – J. Int. Ads. Soc. 11731
34. Vieira R S and Beppu M M 2006 Water Res. 401726
35. Wang L Y, Ma G H and Su Z G 2005 J. Control. Rel. 106 6210.1016/j.jconrel.2005.04.005 ↗