Ultrasonic-assisted fabrication of superhydrophobic ZnO nanowall films
Source abstract
Abstract
Zinc oxide-based superhydrophobic surfaces were fabricated on aluminium oxide-seeded glass substrates via sonochemical approach by varying the parameter, the sonication time duration. The fabricated structures have nanowall-like morphology with an average long axis length and thickness of $${\sim }300$$ and $${\sim }40~\hbox {nm}$$ , respectively. The surface roughness created by surface-modified ZnO nanowalls and the air pockets trapped within the dense nanowalls, transformed the hydrophobic glass substrates into superhydrophobic surfaces with water contact angle of $$156{\circ }$$ during 20 min of sonication. An independent analysis was carried out to study the growth of ZnO nanowalls over glass substrates in the absence of the aluminium oxide seed layer and sonication process. The results suggested that the synergistic effect of the aluminium oxide seed layer and sonochemical process can enable the formation of ZnO nanowall structures favourable for superhydrophobic property. A possible growth mechanism of ZnO nanowalls formation during sonication process has been discussed in detail.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · ZnO doping and properties · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Yu S, Guo Z and Liu W 2015 ChemCommun. 51 1775
2. Jung S-H, Oh E, Lee K-H, Park W and Jeong S-H 2007 Adv. Mater. 19 74910.1002/adma.200601859 ↗
3. Perelshtein I, Applerot G, Perkas N, Wehrschetz-Sigl E, Hasmann A and Guebitz G M 2009 Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1 36110.1021/am8000743 ↗
4. Oh E, Choi H-Y, Jung S-H, Cho S, Kim J C, Lee K-H et al 2009 Sens. Actuators B 141 23910.1016/j.snb.2009.06.031 ↗
5. Nayak A P, Katzenmeyer A M, Kim J-Y, Kwon M K, Gosho Y and Islam M S 2010 Proc. SPIE 7683 76831210.1117/12.851755 ↗
6. Okyay T O, Bala R K, Nguyen H N, Atalay R, Bayam Y and Rodrigues D F 2015 RSC Adv. 5 256810.1039/C4RA12539H ↗
7. Wang T, Liu Y, Li G, Sun Z, Lu J, Liu B et al 2011 CrystEngComm. 13 266110.1039/c0ce00890g ↗
8. Yu J, Li Q, Hao Y F, Kuang S Y, Bai X D, Chong Y M et al 2010 ACS Nano 4 41410.1021/nn901204c ↗
9. Tang J-F, Su H-H, Lu Y-M and Chu S-Y 2015 CrystEngComm. 17 59210.1039/C4CE01940G ↗
10. Suslick K S, Gawienowski J J, Schubert P F and Wang H H 1984 Ultrasonics 22 3310.1016/0041-624X(84)90059-3 ↗
11. Lee G-H 2010 Ceram. Int. 36 187110.1016/j.ceramint.2010.03.024 ↗
12. Yu H, Zhang Z, Han M, Hao X and Zhu F 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 237810.1021/ja043121y ↗
13. Mason T J 1986 Ultrasonics 24 24510.1016/0041-624X(86)90101-0 ↗
14. Yuan Y and Lee T R 2013 Surface science techniques Bracco G and Holst B (ed) (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer) p 3
15. Peltonen J, Jarn M, Areva S, Linden M and Rosenholm J B 2004 Langmuir 20 942810.1021/la0400252 ↗
16. Gurav A B, Latthe S S and Vhatkar R S 2013 Surf. Innov. 1 17610.1680/si.13.00007 ↗
17. Guo Z, Chen X, Li J, Liu J H and Huang X J 2011 Langmuir 27 619310.1021/la104979x ↗