journal article·2014-10

Improvement in structural and electrical properties of cuprous oxide-coated multiwalled carbon nanotubes

Shivani Dhall, Neena Jaggi

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 37· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

In the present work, cuprous oxide (Cu2O) nanoparticles are coated on multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) using Fehling’s reaction. The coating of Cu2O nanoparticles on the nanotubes was confirmed by SEM and X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra. The calculated ID/IG ratio of Cu2O (using 3% CuSO4 by wt)-coated MWCNTs by Raman spectra is found to decrease to 0.94 as compared to 1.14 for pristine MWCNTs. It shows that the presence of Cu2O nanoparticles on nanotubes decreases the inherent defects present in the form of some pentagons/heptagons in the honeycomb hexagonal carbon atoms in the structure of graphene sheets of MWCNTs and increases the crystalline nature of MWCNTs, which is also confirmed by the XRD peaks. Whereas the value of ID/IG ratio increases to 1.39 for sample 2 (using 5% CuSO4 by wt), which represents the structural deformation. Moreover, the electrical conductivity of MWCNTs was increased by 3 times after coating the nanotubes with Cu2O (using 3% CuSO4 by wt).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Balasubramanian K and Burghard M 2005 Small 1 18010.1002/smll.200400118 ↗
2. Bokobza L 2009 Vib. Spect. 51 5210.1016/j.vibspec.2008.10.001 ↗
3. Cancado L G, Takai K, Enoki T, Endo M and Kim Y A 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 16310610.1063/1.2196057 ↗
4. Chen C S, Xie X D, Liu T G, Lin L W, Kuang J C, Xie X L, Lu L J and Cao S Y 2012 J. Nanopart. Res. 14 81710.1007/s11051-012-0817-5 ↗
5. Ebbesen T W 1996 Adv. Mater. 8 15510.1002/adma.19960080212 ↗
6. Gallegos A K C, Frausto C, Frade L A O and Orozco G 2011 Vib. Spect. 57 49
7. Gupta S and Farmer J 2011 Appl. Phys. 109 01431410.1063/1.3524187 ↗
8. Hee S W, Seung B Y, Jeunghee P, Hyunik Y, Kwang P S and Sangsig K J 2002 Chem. Phys. 116 9492
9. Hoa N D, Quy N V, Jung H, Kin D, Kim H and Hong S K 2010 Sens. Actuators 146 26610.1016/j.snb.2010.02.058 ↗
10. Iijima S 1991 Nature 354 5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
11. Kim D W, Rhee K Y and Park S J 2012 J. Alloys Compd. 530 610.1016/j.jallcom.2012.02.157 ↗
12. Khan N A and Aziz S 2012 J. Alloys Compd. 538 18310.1016/j.jallcom.2012.05.074 ↗
13. Liaoa X N, Hub C Y, Wanga Q L and Lid F Y 2009 J. Chinese Chem. Soc. 56 47510.1002/jccs.200900071 ↗
14. Jha N and Ramaprabhu S 2008 J. Phys. Chem. C112 9315
15. Olek M, Busgen T, Hilgendorff and Giersig M 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B110 1290110.1021/jp061453e ↗
16. Peng X, Misewich J A and Wong S S 2009 Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 107610.1039/b811424m ↗
17. Randeniya L K, Bendavid A, Martin P J and Tran C 2010 Small 6 180610.1002/smll.201000493 ↗
18. Reddy K R, Sin B C, Yoo C H, Park W, Ryu K S, Lee J S, Sohn D and Lee Y 2008 Scr. Mater. 58 101010.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.047 ↗
19. Riehemann K, Schneider S W, Luger T A, Godin B, Ferrari M and Fuchs H 2009 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 87210.1002/anie.200802585 ↗
20. Subramaniam C, Yamada T, Kobashi K, Sekiguchi A, Futaba D N, Yumura M and Hata K 2013 Nature 4 2202
21. Shan X L et al 2007 Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. 17 1065
22. Tessonnier J P et al 2009 Carbon 47 177910.1016/j.carbon.2009.02.032 ↗
23. Zebli B, Vieyra H A, Carmeli I, Hartschuh A, Kotthaus J P and Holleitner A W 2009 Phys. Rev. B79 20540210.1103/PhysRevB.79.205402 ↗
24. Zein S H S and Boccaccini A R 2008 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47 659810.1021/ie701770q ↗
25. Zhi C, Bando Y, Tang C and Golberg D 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B110 854810.1021/jp056705a ↗