journal article·2022-11

Fire-extinguishing performance and gas-phase pollution characteristics of different foam agents in extinguishing transformer oil pool fire

Jiaqing Zhang, Fengju Shang, Wencheng Zhou, Fei Xiao, Dengfeng Cheng

Journal of Fire Sciences· Volume 40· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, aqueous film-forming foam, fluoroprotein foam, and synthetic foam were applied to extinguish the transformer oil pool fires. The fire-extinguishing performance and burn-back resistance were investigated using a laboratory fire-extinguishing system. Moreover, the emission products were analyzed to evaluate the gas-phase pollution characteristics. Results show that aqueous film-forming foam presents the highest fire-extinguishing efficiency, while fluoroprotein foam has the best burn-back performance. Flue gas and gas chromatography–mass spectrometer analyses demonstrate that the use of fluoroprotein foam results in much higher CO emissions than other foams, and the pollutants are mainly from various hydrocarbons produced by incomplete combustion of transformer oil. Synthetic foam and aqueous film-forming foam lead to higher SO 2 and NO emissions, and pollutants are mainly dominated by alcohols and ethers. Noteworthily, when using aqueous film-forming foam to extinguish oil pool fire, a persistent organic pollutant, perfluorooctanoic acid, is detected in the gas phase.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fire dynamics and safety research · Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols · Air Quality and Health Impacts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Electric Fire and Safety Protection (State Grid Laboratory of Fire Protection for Transmission and Distribution Facilities), State Grid Anhui Electric Power Research Institute, Hefei, China

School of Safety Science and Emergency Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China

Funding

Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10973-019-08599-610.1007/s10973-019-08599-6 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c0017510.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00175 ↗
3. Rakowska J
4. 10.1016/j.csite.2019.10057810.1016/j.csite.2019.100578 ↗
5. Wang S
6. Wang BW
7. 10.1002/ceat.20120040110.1002/ceat.201200401 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.12210.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.122 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0212510.1021/acs.est.1c02125 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.12961210.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129612 ↗
11. 10.1021/es401887710.1021/es4018877 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.08510.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.085 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10694-010-0204-710.1007/s10694-010-0204-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.etap.2017.01.01710.1016/j.etap.2017.01.017 ↗
15. 10.1002/etc.468410.1002/etc.4684 ↗
16. 10.14346/JKOSOS.2014.29.2.01810.14346/JKOSOS.2014.29.2.018 ↗
17. 10.1002/fam.228410.1002/fam.2284 ↗
18. 10.1155/2015/92389410.1155/2015/923894 ↗
19. Zhang XZ
20. 10.1007/s13762-018-2161-510.1007/s13762-018-2161-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60005-X10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60005-X ↗
22. 10.1016/j.envint.2022.10728910.1016/j.envint.2022.107289 ↗
23. 10.1080/00102202.2022.212530610.1080/00102202.2022.2125306 ↗
24. 10.3390/app607019110.3390/app6070191 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10694-010-0204-710.1007/s10694-010-0204-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.envint.2015.05.00510.1016/j.envint.2015.05.005 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c0005210.1021/acs.estlett.0c00052 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.12169110.1016/j.fuel.2021.121691 ↗
29. BS EN 1568-3:2008. Fire extinguishing media—foam concentrates—part 2: specification for high expansion foam concentrates for surface application to water-immiscible liquids, https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/dcc630c9-6481-4b84-a9fb-9768e68d223e/en-1568-2-2008-ac-2010
30. 10.1186/s40038-016-0016-z10.1186/s40038-016-0016-z ↗
31. 10.1016/j.psep.2020.03.01110.1016/j.psep.2020.03.011 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.14210.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.142 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0379-7112(01)00024-810.1016/S0379-7112(01)00024-8 ↗
34. Rivai M
35. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.10429210.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104292 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10973-020-10074-610.1007/s10973-020-10074-6 ↗
37. 10.3139/113.11030010.3139/113.110300 ↗
38. 10.1080/01932691.2015.112434110.1080/01932691.2015.1124341 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10694-021-01099-w10.1007/s10694-021-01099-w ↗
40. 10.14346/JKOSOS.2015.30.4.7910.14346/JKOSOS.2015.30.4.79 ↗
41. 10.1080/01932691.2021.195792310.1080/01932691.2021.1957923 ↗
42. 10.1109/TDEI.2012.631151110.1109/TDEI.2012.6311511 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.23310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.233 ↗
44. Zajemska M · Econ Environ Stud · 2015 · 15 · 445
45. 10.1021/ie100458f10.1021/ie100458f ↗
46. 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.02710.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.027 ↗
47. 10.1016/0021-9517(86)90204-610.1016/0021-9517(86)90204-6 ↗
48. 10.1016/0021-9517(82)90292-510.1016/0021-9517(82)90292-5 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.02310.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.023 ↗
50. Gancarczyk D · Rocz Ochr Srodowiska · 2018 · 20 · 1199
51. 10.1021/es301465n10.1021/es301465n ↗