journal article·2022-09-29

Effects of Gd ions doping on the microstructural, magnetic and optical properties in ZnO nanocrystals

Shradha Roy, Mritunjoy Prasad Ghosh, Sipun Mohanty, Samrat Mukherjee

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

This article reports the structural, magnetic and optical responses of Gd ion-substituted ZnO nanoparticles prepared via soft chemical co-precipitation technique. Both the hexagonal wurtzite crystal structure and crystallographic phase purity of all the samples were observed by using X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique. Three widely accepted methods, i.e., Scherrer’s approach, Williamson–Hall plot and Halder–Wagner method, have been used to determine the average crystallite size and microstrain within the nanosized ZnO crystals. Average crystallite size was obtained within the range of 23 ± 3 nm. Mean particle size obtained from HRTEM image was also found in good harmony with the XRD results. UV–visible spectra signified that all the nanosized ZnO samples manifested strong absorption in between 410 and 455 nm. The presence of both Zn and O vacancies in the samples was verified by the photoluminescence studies. Paramagnetic response of Gd ions in ZnO nanoparticles weakened the defect-driven magnetic behaviour at room temperature.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Sharma P, Gupta A, Rao K V, Owens F J, Sharma R, Guillen J M O et al 2003 Nat. Mater. 2 67310.1038/nmat984 ↗
2. Vijayaprasath G, Murugan R, Hayakawa Y and Ravi G 2016 J. Luminescence 178 37510.1016/j.jlumin.2016.06.004 ↗
3. Baturay S, Ocak Y S and Kaya D 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 645 2910.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.212 ↗
4. Haq B U, Ahmed R, Shaari A, Afaq A, Tahir B and Khenata R 2015 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 29 25610.1016/j.mssp.2014.04.004 ↗
5. Ocak Y S 2012 J. Alloys Compd. 513 13010.1016/j.jallcom.2011.10.005 ↗
6. Roy S, Ghosh M P and Mukherjee S 2021 Appl. Phys. A 127 45110.1007/s00339-021-04580-z ↗
7. Kohan A F, Ceder G, Morgan D and Van de Walle C G 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 1501910.1103/PhysRevB.61.15019 ↗
8. Morkoc H and Ozgur U 2009 Zinc oxide: fundamentals materials and device technology (Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, Germany) 1–76
9. Minami T, Stao H, Nanto H and Takata S 1985 Japn. J. Appl. Phys. 24 L78110.1143/JJAP.24.L781 ↗
10. Punia K, Lal G, Dalela S, Dolia S N, Alvi P A, Barbar S K et al 2021 J. Alloys Compd. 868 15914210.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159142 ↗
11. Ghosh M P, Mandal S and Mukherjee S 2020 Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135 4110.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00112-5 ↗
12. Obeid M M, Jappor H R, Al-Marzoki K, Al-Hydary I A, Edress S J and Shukur M M 2019 RSC Adv. 9 3320710.1039/C9RA04750F ↗
13. Ghosh M P and Mukherjee S 2020 Mater. Res. Bull. 125s 110785
14. Bhushan B, Mukherjee S, Basumallick A, Bandopadhyay S K and Das D 2008 Hyperfine Interact. 187 10110.1007/s10751-008-9889-0 ↗
15. Miahra A K, Chaudhuri S K, Mukherjee S, Priyam A, Saha A and Das D 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 10351410.1063/1.2817598 ↗
16. Bindu P and Thomas S 2014 J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 8 12310.1007/s40094-014-0141-9 ↗
17. Sajjad M, Ullah I, Khan M, Khan J, Khan M Y and Qureshi M T 2018 Results. Phys. 9 130110.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.010 ↗
18. Raj K P and Sandayandi K 2016 Physica B: Condens. Matter 487 110.1016/j.physb.2016.01.020 ↗
19. Nath D, Singh F and Das R 2020 Mater. Chem. Phys. 239 12202110.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122021 ↗
20. Raj K P, Sadaiyandi K, Kennedy A and Thamizselvi R 2016 Mater. Chem. Phys. 183 2410.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.07.068 ↗
21. Kennedy J, Murmu P P, Leveneur J, Markwitz A and Futter J 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 367 5210.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.160 ↗
22. Samanta P K, Sinha A and Kamilya T 2014 J. Nano Electron. Phys. 6 04015
23. Ghosh M P and Mukherjee S 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 489 16532010.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165320 ↗
24. Tomar S, Gupta S, Mukherjee S, Singh A, Kumar S, Kumar V et al 2021 Phys. Scr. 96 06580210.1088/1402-4896/abed7e ↗
25. Vanheusden K, Seager C H, Warren W L, Tallant D R and Voigt J A 1996 Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 40310.1063/1.116699 ↗
26. Yi X Y, Ma C Y, Yuan F, Wang N, Qin F W, Hu B C et al 2017 Thin Solid Films 636 33910.1016/j.tsf.2017.05.020 ↗
27. Djurisic A B and Leung Y H 2006 Small 2 94410.1002/smll.200600134 ↗
28. Shalish I, Temkin H and Narayanamurti V 2004 Phys. Rev. 69 110.1103/PhysRevB.69.245401 ↗
29. Jeong S H, Kim B S and Lee B T 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 262510.1063/1.1568543 ↗
30. Tatsumi T, Fujita M, Kawamoto N, Sasajima M and Horikoshi Y 2004 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43 260210.1143/JJAP.43.2602 ↗
31. Reddy G K, Reddy A J, Krishna R H, Nagabhushana B M and Gopal G R 2017 J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 5 35010.1016/j.jascer.2017.06.008 ↗
32. Liu D, Lv Y, Zhang M, Liu Y, Zhu Y, Zong R et al 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 1537710.1039/C4TA02678K ↗
33. Lin B, Fu Z and Jia Y 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 79 94310.1063/1.1394173 ↗
34. Heo Y H, Norton D P and Pearton S J 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 98 07350210.1063/1.2064308 ↗
35. Sahu D, Panda N R, Acharya B S and Panda A K 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 1104110.1016/j.ceramint.2014.03.119 ↗