Production of a novel supercapacitor electrode material from Rheum ribes and its application
Source abstract
Abstract
The efficient use of energy produced from alternative energy sources and the uninterrupted delivery of energy to consumers reveals the importance of energy storage. Intensive studies are carried out on supercapacitors, which will soon replace batteries in the energy storage area, owing to their superior properties. In this study, Rheum ribes peel was converted to activated carbon for the first time using carbonization and different activation methods, and three supercapacitor cells were prepared using these materials. The surface characterizations of the obtained electrode materials were performed using scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller and X-ray diffraction analysis methods. The best specific capacitance value was obtained for the RRP-pure electrode and was 70.82 F g(-1) at a current density of 1 A g(-1). The cyclic voltammetry curves of electrodes were perfectly obtained and found extremely similar to the ideal supercapacitor curves. The RRP-pure electrode has a maximum energy density of 6.78 Wh kg(-1) at a power density of 618.86 W kg(-1) and exhibited good stability. For the all-prepared electrodes, the ion exchange between the electrode materials and the electrolyte was at a good level and equivalent series resistance values of the electrodes were low, leading to a positive advantage in energy transmission. The produced electrodes are cheap, environmentally friendly, efficient, high capacity and stable, making them an excellent alternative to conventional methods in the field of energy storage.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Biodiesel Production and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Guo F, Jiang X, Li X, Peng K, Guo C and Rao Z 2019 J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 30 91410.1007/s10854-018-0362-9 ↗
2. Tang L, Zhou Y, Zhou X, Chai Y, Zheng Q and Lin D 2019 J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 30 260010.1007/s10854-018-0535-6 ↗
3. Tang W, Zhang Y, Zhong Y, Shen T, Wang X, Xia X et al 2017 Mater. Res. Bull. 88 23410.1016/j.materresbull.2016.12.025 ↗
4. Thirumal V, Dhamodharan K, Yuvakkumar R, Ravi G, Saravanakumar B, Thambidurai M et al 2021 Chemosphere 282 13103310.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131033 ↗
5. Bortamuly R, Naresh V, Das M R, Kumar V K, Muduli S, Martha S K et al 2021 J. Energy Storage 42 10314410.1016/j.est.2021.103144 ↗
6. Ahmed S, Ahmed A and Rafat M 2018 J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 22 99310.1016/j.jscs.2018.03.002 ↗
7. Zhou J, Wang M and Li X 2019 J. Porous Mater. 26 9910.1007/s10934-018-0622-3 ↗
8. Ma X, Ding C, Li D, Wu M and Yu Y 2018 Cellulose 25 474310.1007/s10570-018-1903-3 ↗
9. Feng T, Wang S, Hua Y, Zhou P, Liu G, Ji K et al 2021 J. Energy Storage 44 10328610.1016/j.est.2021.103286 ↗
10. Singh A, Ghosh K, Kumar S, Agrawal A K, Jassal M, Goswami P et al 2021 in Flexible fibre supercapacitor using synthesized biomass-based activated carbon and few-layer graphene for wearable electronic devices (Singapore City: Springer) p 1
11. Demiray H, Estep A S, Tabanca N, Becnel J J and Demirci B 2022 Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 32 8110.1007/s43450-021-00224-8 ↗
12. Akdemir M2021 J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 32 2724310.1007/s10854-021-07090-z ↗
13. Karakaş D E, Akdemir M, Atabani A and Kaya M 2021 Fuel 304 12133410.1016/j.fuel.2021.121334 ↗
14. Kalkan S, Otağ M R and Engin M S2020 Food Chem. 307 12552410.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125524 ↗
15. Zou H, Jiang Q, Zhu R, Chen Y, Sun T, Li M et al 2020 J. Environ. Manage. 254 10983010.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109830 ↗
16. Thakur A K, Majumder M, Choudhary R B and Singh S B 2018 J. Power Sources 402 16310.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.029 ↗
17. Zhang J, Xu J and Zhang D 2015 J. Electrochem. Soc. 163 E8310.1149/2.0801603jes ↗
18. Er Ö F, Cavak A, Aldemir A and Kivrak H D 2020 MANAS J. Eng. 8 9010.51354/mjen.801182 ↗
19. Xie J, Zhang Q, Gu L, Xu S, Wang P, Liu J et al 2016 Nano Energy 21 24710.1016/j.nanoen.2016.01.013 ↗
20. Cheng Q, Tang J, Ma J, Zhang H, Shinya N and Qin L-C 2011 Carbon 49 291710.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.068 ↗
21. Yan X, Yu Y and Yang X 2014 RSC Adv. 4 2498610.1039/C4RA02299H ↗
22. Shao H, Padmanathan N, McNulty D, O’Dwyer C and Razeeb K M 2018 ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2 56910.1021/acsaem.8b01612 ↗
23. Kong S, Jin B, Quan X, Zhang G, Guo X, Zhu Q et al 2019 J. Electroanal. Chem. 850 11341210.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113412 ↗
24. Christen T and Carlen M W 2000 J. Power Sources 91 21010.1016/S0378-7753(00)00474-2 ↗
25. Akdemir M, Avci Hansu T, Caglar A, Kaya M and Demir Kivrak H 2021 Energy Storage 3 e24310.1002/est2.243 ↗
26. Lu X, Xiang K, Zhou W, Zhu Y and Chen H 2018 Bull. Mater. Sci. 41 110.1007/s12034-018-1666-3 ↗
27. Manyala N, Bello A, Barzegar F, Khaleed A A, Momodu D Y and Dangbegnon J K 2016 Mater. Chem. Phys. 182 13910.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.07.015 ↗
28. Elma Karakaş D 2022 Int. J. Energy Res. 46 178910.1002/er.7294 ↗
29. Rai S, Bhujel R, Biswas J and Swain B P 2021 Bull. Mater. Sci. 44 110.1007/s12034-020-02288-z ↗
30. Özarslan S, Raşit Atelge M, Kaya M and Ünalan S 2021 Fuel 305 12157810.1016/j.fuel.2021.121578 ↗
31. Luan Y, Huang Y, Wang L, Li M, Wang R and Jiang B 2016 J. Electroanal. Chem. 763 9010.1016/j.jelechem.2015.12.046 ↗
32. Bolat M, Yavuz C and Kaya M 2021 J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 32 1812310.1007/s10854-021-06356-w ↗
33. Aziz H, Tetra O, Alif A and Ramadhan W 2016 Der. Pharma. Chem. 8 227