On the application of non-uniform water cooling for the fire safety of fuel storage tank farms
Source abstract
Abstract
Compromising between application rate and spacing between tanks is one of the vague points regarding fire mitigation in hydrocarbon storage tanks. Codes and standards recommendations are not comprehensive and sometimes contradicting. The traditional, uniform, coolant application technique requires high storage capacities and over-consumes the coolant. This study investigates a non-traditional technique using non-uniform coolant distribution and illustrates the effect of this technique on coolant and land savings. A model is created to simulate fire propagation and mitigation through cooling water application under steady state conditions for surface pool fires in cylindrical hydrocarbon storage tanks. The model considers the types of fuel, the wind speed and direction, the smoke effect and the nozzles distribution, and the number of segments on the target tank surface. The model is applied on a real-life case study. The suggested technique achieved up to 30% reduction in cooling water consumption or 5.6% reduction in land area.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire dynamics and safety research · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Combustion and Detonation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Power Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain shams University, Cairo, Egypt
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.08.00310.1016/j.fuproc.2012.08.003 ↗
2. Devia F
3. 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.00310.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.01510.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.015 ↗
5. Jimenez ACF. Risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis of protection measures for bund fires in storage facilities, 2017, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5cdbcb5a7a1fbd56ceb62430/t/5e6662334e2d484ed8301e5b/1583768137190/Andres+Forero+Thesis.pdf
6. Mansour KA. · 2012
7. 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.04.02510.1016/j.jlp.2017.04.025 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.08.01010.1016/j.firesaf.2014.08.010 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0082-0784(63)80091-010.1016/S0082-0784(63)80091-0 ↗
10. 10.1016/0360-1285(84)90119-910.1016/0360-1285(84)90119-9 ↗
11. 10.1177/10423915890010040410.1177/104239158900100404 ↗
12. Pritchard MJ · Inst Chem Eng Symp Ser · 1993 · 130 · 491
13. 10.1016/0379-7112(83)90002-410.1016/0379-7112(83)90002-4 ↗
14. Hurley MJ · 2015
15. 10.6028/NIST.IR.654610.6028/NIST.IR.6546 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11668-021-01236-110.1007/s11668-021-01236-1 ↗
17. IP19 Fire Precautions at Petroleum Refineries Bulk Storage Installations · 2012
18. API-PUBL 2030:2014. Guidelines for Application of Water Spray Systems for Fire Protection in the Petroleum Industry.
19. NFPA 15 Standard for Water Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection . Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2012.
20. NFPA 30 Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code . Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2015.
21. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.09.00110.1016/j.combustflame.2004.09.001 ↗
22. American Gas Association. LNG Safety Program. Interim Report on Phase II Work. Report IS 3-1, 1974, https://www.worldcat.org/title/lng-safety-program-interim-report-on-phase-ii-work/oclc/6501286
23. 10.1007/BF0238081010.1007/BF02380810 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.proci.2020.05.05210.1016/j.proci.2020.05.052 ↗
25. Kondrat’Yev KY. · 1965
26. 10.1007/BF0103978110.1007/BF01039781 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.09.00310.1016/j.firesaf.2015.09.003 ↗
28. Persson H · Fire Res · 2015 · 12 · 1
29. 10.1007/BF0103977910.1007/BF01039779 ↗
30. 10.1364/AO.28.00171410.1364/AO.28.001714 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.psep.2017.04.00910.1016/j.psep.2017.04.009 ↗
32. Yumoto T. · FRI Report · 1971 · 33 · 1
33. 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.06.03910.1016/j.jlp.2005.06.039 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.08.00710.1016/j.jlp.2017.08.007 ↗