journal article·2021-06

A DFT study in bulk magnetic moment of FexCo1–x (0 ≤ x ≤ 1)

M Solorza-Guzmán, G Ramírez-Dámaso, F L Castillo-Alvarado

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we present results of the electronic density of states (DOS) and bulk magnetic moment of iron (Fe), cobalt (Co) and their alloys (FexCo1–x; x = 1.0, 0.95, …, 0.0). Density functional theory with the generalized gradient approximation was applied to obtain geometric and electronic properties. The methodology uses virtual crystal approximation, in conjunction with CASTEP module and the functionals PBE and PBESol of the molecular simulation program Material Studio. We optimized the geometry of the bulk (obtaining their lattice parameters), which the structure was used to determine the bulk magnetic moments. To determine the magnetic moment, we calculated the difference of the electronic DOS of the electrons with spin up and spin down. The geometric optimization and magnetic moment obtained in the present study are very similar to the experimental results, with a maximum error of 8%, which makes the present article interesting.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Kittel C 1996 Introduction to solid state physics 7th edn (New York: Wiley)
2. Bardos D I 1969 J. Appl. Phys. 40 137110.1063/1.1657673 ↗
3. Asano H, Bando Y, Nakanishi N and Kachi S 1967 Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 8 18010.2320/matertrans1960.8.180 ↗
4. Bozorth R M 1951 Ferromagnetism (New Jersey: Van Nostrand)
5. Guo G Y and Wang H H 2000 Chin. J. Phys. 38 949
6. Bhatia M L 2010 Curr. Sci. 99 785
7. Ohnishi S, Freeman A J and Weinert M 1983 Phys. Rev. B 28 674110.1103/PhysRevB.28.6741 ↗
8. Ramírez-Dámaso G, Castillo-Alvarado F L and Rojas-Hernández E 2016 Physica B 503 14710.1016/j.physb.2016.09.030 ↗
9. Ramírez-Dámaso G, Castillo-Alvarado F L, Cruz-Torres A and Rojas-Hernández E 2016 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 94 3710.1016/j.jpcs.2016.03.006 ↗
10. O’Handley and Robert C 1999 Modern magnetic materials principles and applications (Massachusetts Institute of Technology: John Wiley & Sons, Inc)
11. Morán-López J L and Falicov L M 1979 Phys. Rev. B 20 390010.1103/PhysRevB.20.3900 ↗
12. Kikuchi R 1951 Phys. Rev. 81 98810.1103/PhysRev.81.988 ↗
13. Kohn W and Sham L 1965 J. Phys. Rev. 140 A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
14. Parr R G and Yang W 1995 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 19 575
15. Koch W and Hertwing R H 1998 in Encyclopedia of computational chemistry P V R Schleyer (ed) (Chichester: Wiley)
16. Ceperley D M and Alder B 1980 J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 56610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 ↗
17. Perdew J P and Zunger A 1981 Phys. Rev. B 23 504810.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
18. Perdew J P, Chevary J A, Vosko S H, Jackson Koblar A, Pederson Mark R, Singh D J et al 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
19. Perdew J P, Burke K and Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
20. Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I, Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E, Constantin L A et al 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 13640610.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406 ↗