Polyurethane–POSS hybrid materials: by solution blending and in-situ polymerization processes
Source abstract
Abstract
Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) is a nanostructured soft material that tremendously influences the properties of polymers. This paper delineates the preparation of polyurethane–POSS hybrid materials by physical blending and in-situ polymerization, and studies their properties. In the physical blending method, a polyurethane (BDO–PU) was prepared by using polycaprolactone diol (PCL-diol) as a soft segment, 4,4 $$^\prime $$ -methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) (MDI) as a diisocyanate and 1,4-butanediol (BDO) as a chain extender. The PU–POSS hybrid material (BDO–PU/POSS) was then prepared by the dispersion of POSS (octahydroxy POSS) molecules in the synthesized BDO–PU matrix by the solution mixing method. In the in-situ polymerization method, POSS–PU and POSS–BDO–PU hybrid materials were prepared using POSS and the combination of POSS and BDO as a crosslinker or a chain extender. The formation of PU and PU–POSS hybrid materials was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared and differential scanning calorimetry analyses. The introduction of octahydroxy POSS molecules into the PU matrix resulted in a reduction of glass transition temperature ( $$T_{\mathrm {g}})$$ . However, POSS–PU hybrid materials prepared by the in-situ polymerization method had significantly less $$T_{\mathrm {g}}$$ compared to the hybrid materials prepared by the solution or physical blending method. The incorporation of POSS molecules by using the in-situ polymerization process resulted in an increase in the surface hydrophobicity (water contact angle, WCA $$=$$ 125 $$\circ $$ ) compared to the same prepared by using the solution blending process (WCA $$=$$ 106 $$\circ $$ ). Moreover, the WCA values of all hybrid materials (WCA $$=$$ 106–125 $$\circ $$ ) are much higher than those of the pristine BDO–PU (WCA $$=$$ 84 $$\circ $$ ). The higher WCA value of the hybrid materials is due to the combined effect of the hydrophobic nature of POSS molecules as well as the increased surface roughness, as evidenced by the AFM 3D images. The hybrid materials prepared by the in-situ polymerization method exhibited improved mechanical and thermal properties compared to those prepared by the solution blending method.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Synthesis and properties of polymers · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Levine F, Escarsega J and La Scala J 2012 Prog. Org. Coat. 74 57210.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.02.004 ↗
2. Wynne J H, Fulmer P A, McCluskey D M, Mackey N M and Buchanan J P 2011 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3 200510.1021/am200250d ↗
3. Xu H, Yin S, Zhu W, Song Y and Tang B 2006 Polymer 47 698610.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.006 ↗
4. Behera P K, Mondal P and Singha N K 2018 Polym. Chem. 9 420510.1039/C8PY00549D ↗
5. Ghosh S, Ganguly S, Remanan S, Mondal S, Jana S, Maji P K et al 2018 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 29 10177
6. Oaten M and Choudhury N R 2005 Macromolecules 38 639210.1021/ma0476543 ↗
7. Michałowski S, Hebda E and Pielichowski K 2017 J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 130 15510.1007/s10973-017-6391-4 ↗
8. Behera P K, Mondal P and Singha N K 2018 Macromolecules 51 477010.1021/acs.macromol.8b00583 ↗
9. Lai Y, Tsai C, Yang H, Wang G and Wu K 2009 Mater. Chem. Phys. 117 9110.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.05.006 ↗
10. Hao W, Fang C, Yu J, Zhang L, Xue T and Yang W 2014J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131 4090210.1002/app.40902 ↗
11. Knight P T, Lee K M, Qin H and Mather P T 2008 Biomacromolecules 9 245810.1021/bm8004935 ↗
12. Tan J, Jia Z, Sheng D, Wen X and Yang Y 2011 Polym. Eng. Sci. 51 79510.1002/pen.21877 ↗
13. Markovic E, Nguyen K, Clarke S, Constantopoulos K, Matisons J and Simon G P 2013 J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 51 503810.1002/pola.26934 ↗
14. Fu B X, Hsiao B S, White H, Rafailovich M, Mather P T, Jeon H G et al 2000 Polym. Int. 49 43710.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(200005)49:5<437::AID-PI239>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
15. Fu B X, Hsiao B, Pagola S, Stephens P, White H, Rafailovich M et al 2001 Polymer 42 59910.1016/S0032-3861(00)00389-X ↗
16. Turri S and Levi M 2005 Macromolecules 38 556910.1021/ma047304g ↗
17. Wei K, Wang L and Zheng S 2013 Polym. Chem. 4 149110.1039/C2PY20930F ↗
18. Raftopoulos K N, Jancia M, Aravopoulou D, Hebda E, Pielichowski K and Pissis P 2013 Macromolecules 46 737810.1021/ma401417t ↗
19. Mya K Y, Wang Y, Shen L, Xu J, Wu Y, Lu X et al 2009 J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 47 460210.1002/pola.23512 ↗
20. Neumann D, Fisher M, Tran L and Matisons J G 2002 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 1399810.1021/ja0275921 ↗
21. Liu Y, Ni Y and Zheng S 2006 Macromol. Chem. Phys. 207 184210.1002/macp.200600241 ↗
22. Ghermezcheshme H, Mohseni M and Yahyaei H 2015 Tribol. Int. 88 6610.1016/j.triboint.2015.02.023 ↗
23. Prządka D, Jęczalik J, Andrzejewska E, Marciniec B, Dutkiewicz M and Szłapka M 2013 React. Funct. Polym. 73 11410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.09.006 ↗
24. Prządka D, Jęczalik J, Andrzejewska E and Dutkiewicz M 2013 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130 202310.1002/app.39385 ↗
25. Raftopoulos K N, Koutsoumpis S, Jancia M, Lewicki J P, Kyriakos K, Mason H E et al 2015 Macromolecules 48 142910.1021/ma5023132 ↗
26. Raftopoulos K N, Pagacz J, Ozimek J, Koutsoumpis S, Michałowski S, Hebda E et al 2019 Polym. Bull. 76 288710.1007/s00289-018-2528-2 ↗
27. Yu T, Lin T, Tsai Y and Liu W 1999 J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 37 267310.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19990915)37:18<2673::AID-POLB11>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
28. Petrovic Z S, Javni I and Divjakovic V 1998 J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 36 22110.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19980130)36:2<221::AID-POLB3>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
29. Majka T M, Raftopoulos K N and Pielichowski K 2018 J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 133 28910.1007/s10973-017-6942-8 ↗