Thermo-mechanical investigation of PEG–PVA biohybrid active film grafted with copper nanoparticles for packaging applications
Source abstract
Abstract
The global fabrication of conventional plastics has increased attributes to the prodigious applications. The product developed in the present work is a vitreous alternative to the traditional, non-biodegradable, crude-based plastics, which degrades axiomatically. It compensates for the exceedingly depleting oil reserves and truncates the plastic waste. This research emphasizes the evolution of sustainable active food packaging film to proliferate the shelf life of a product and to retain the nutritional content. Here, copper nanoparticles are reinforced into the biohybrid film made up of using polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol and citric acid for an active copper releasing packaging system, which improves the barrier property of the film. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of the copper nanoparticles and the reinforced films delineate the uniform distribution of the nanoparticles in the hybrid matrix. Biodegradation test examined the 16.69% for 1 phr copper-loaded film, which is high in contrary to others. The mechanical properties and heat stability of the biocomposite film meliorated significantly by the inclusion of 1% Cu nanoparticles. The water solubility of the nano-film ranges from 3.64 to 100%, depending upon the extent of crosslinking. The resultant hybrid film is versatile and can be utilized both as cured and uncured forms. The aforementioned properties make it pertinent for drug-delivery applications too.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Pan Z, Rong H and Liu Z 2019 Polym. Compos. 40 35310.1002/pc.24658 ↗
2. Pishvar M, Amirkhosravi M and Altan M C 2019 Polym. Compos. 40 15910.1002/pc.24621 ↗
3. Sharma B, Gautam S, Shekhar S, Sharma R, Rajawat D S and Jain P 2019 Polym. Test. 74 11910.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.022 ↗
4. Wang F, Zhou K, Zhang Q, Le Y, Liu W, Wang Y et al 2019 Microelectron. Eng. 215 11100310.1016/j.mee.2019.111003 ↗
5. Kasirga Y, Oral A and Caner C 2012 Polym. Compos. 33 187410.1002/pc.22310 ↗
6. Park G D, Lee J-H, Lee J-K and Kang Y C 2014 Nano Res. 7 173810.1007/s12274-014-0533-9 ↗
7. Wang S, Junli R, Li W, Sun R and Liu S 2014 Carbohydr. Polym. 103 9410.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.030 ↗
8. Wu Z, Wu J, Peng T, Li Y, Lin D, Xing B et al 2017 Polymers 9 10210.3390/polym9030102 ↗
9. Namazi H and Adeli M 2005 Biomaterials 26 117510.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.014 ↗
10. Tien N-D and Sakurai S 2017 Eur. Polym 89 38110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.02.012 ↗
11. Reddy N and Yang Y 2010 Food Chem. 118 70210.1016/j.foodchem.2009.05.050 ↗
12. Zini E and Scandola M 2011 Polym. Compos. 32 190510.1002/pc.21224 ↗
13. Salvucci E, Rossi M, Colombo A, Pérez G, Borneo R and Aguirre A 2019 Food Packag. Shelf Life 19 19310.1016/j.fpsl.2018.05.007 ↗
14. Parthasarathy V, Selvi J, Senthil Kumar P, Anbarasan R and Mahalakshmi S 2020 Polym. Bull. 19 1
15. Singh R, Kulkarni S G and Naik N H 2013 Adv. Mater. Lett. 4 8210.5185/amlett.2013.icnano.114 ↗
16. Viratyaporn W and Lehman R L 2011 J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 103 26710.1007/s10973-010-1051-y ↗
17. Kal-Kashvandi A T, Heravi M M, Ahmadi S and Hosseinnejad T 2018 J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 28 145710.1007/s10904-018-0811-1 ↗
18. Sawada T and Ando S 1998 Chem. Mater. 10 336810.1021/cm980051j ↗
19. Boggess R K and Taylor L T 1987 J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 25 68510.1002/pola.1987.080250220 ↗
20. Zhang G, Schlarb A K, Tria S and Elkedim O 2008 Compos. Sci. Technol. 68 307310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.027 ↗
21. Taghizadeh M T, Sabouri N and Ghanbarzadeh B 2013 SpringerPlus 2 37610.1186/2193-1801-2-376 ↗
22. Ghanbarzadeh B, Almasi H and Entezami A A 2011 Ind. Crops Prod. 33 22910.1016/j.indcrop.2010.10.016 ↗
23. Sharma B, Shekhar S, Gautam S and Jain P 2018 Polym. Test 69 58310.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.06.019 ↗
24. Sharma B, Malik P and Jain P 2019 Polym. Bull. 76 384110.1007/s00289-018-2582-9 ↗
25. Sharma B 2020 Polym. Bull. 91 106791
26. Gui Z, Xu Y, Cheng S, Gao Y and Lu C 2013 Polym. Bull. 70 32510.1007/s00289-012-0810-2 ↗
27. Gennadios A, Weller C L and Gooding C H 1994 J. Food Eng. 21 39510.1016/0260-8774(94)90062-0 ↗
28. Zare Y 2016 Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 84 15810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.020 ↗
29. Zare Y 2016 Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 91 12710.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.003 ↗
30. Bette S, Costes A, Kremer R K, Eggert G, Tang C C and Dinnebier R E 2019 Z. Anorg. Allg. 645 98810.1002/zaac.201900125 ↗
31. Jussen D, Sandeep S, Carson James K and Pickering K L 2020 Polym. Compos. 28 18010.1177/0967391119867560 ↗
32. Dey Sadhu S, Meena P L, Kumar J, Gupta J, Choudhary S and Gupta A 2020 Polym. Compos. 41 461910.1002/pc.25738 ↗