journal article·2020-12

Chemical pressure-stabilized post spinel-NaMnSnO4 as potential cathode for sodium-ion batteries

ADITI CHIRING, PREMKUMAR SENGUTTUVAN

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Spinel LiMn2O4 is a popular cathode material in lithium-ion batteries due to its high operating voltage and reversible specific capacity. Synthesizing analogous NaMn2O4 in the spinel structure, for sodium-ion batteries, is challenging due to the thermodynamic instability of the compound, mostly arising due to Jahn–Teller distortion of the Mn3+ centre. However, post-spinel NaMn2O4 (named as such because the compounds were initially achieved by subjecting a spinel phase to high pressure) could be synthesized at a high temperature and pressure (1373 K and 4.5 GPa, respectively) and is found to be stable at standard conditions. Also, these compounds have a lower ion diffusion barrier than their respective spinels. In this work, an attempt has been made to induce chemical pressure within the system by the use of a heavy cation, i.e., Sn4+ in the framework, to synthesize post-spinel NaMnSnO4 at ambient pressure conditions. The as-prepared NaMnSnO4 samples are characterized with scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy and galvanostatic cycling with potential limitation measurements.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Dielectric properties of ceramics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Goodenough J B and Park K S 2013 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 116710.1021/ja3091438 ↗
2. Nayak P K, Yang L, Brehm W and Adelhelm P 2018 Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 57 10210.1002/anie.201703772 ↗
3. Hwang J Y, Myung S T and Sun Y 2017 Chem. Soc. Rev. 46 352910.1039/C6CS00776G ↗
4. Yabuuchi N, Kubota K, Dahbi M and Komaba S 2014 Chem. Rev. 114 1163610.1021/cr500192f ↗
5. Slater M D, Kim D, Lee E and Johnson C S 2013 Adv. Funct. Mater. 23 94710.1002/adfm.201200691 ↗
6. Kim S, Ma X, Ong S P and Ceder G A 2012 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14 1557110.1039/c2cp43377j ↗
7. Reed J, Ceder G and Van Der Ven A 2001 Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 4 A7810.1149/1.1368896 ↗
8. Kim D K, Muralidharan P, Lee H W, Ruffo R, Yang Y, Chan C K et al 2008 Nano Lett. 8 394810.1021/nl8024328 ↗
9. Wan C, Nuli Y, Zhuang J and Jiang Z 2002 Mater. Lett. 56 35710.1016/S0167-577X(02)00485-8 ↗
10. Lee M J, Lee S, Oh P, Kim Y and Cho J 2014 Nano Lett. 14 99310.1021/nl404430e ↗
11. Ouyang C Y, Shi S Q and Lei M S 2009 J. Alloys Compd. 474 37010.1016/j.jallcom.2008.06.123 ↗
12. Ishizawa N and Tateishi K 2009 J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 117 610.2109/jcersj2.117.6 ↗
13. Hoang K 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 1827110.1039/C4TA04116J ↗
14. Yabuuchi N, Yano M, Kuze S and Komaba S 2012 Electrochim. Acta 82 29610.1016/j.electacta.2012.06.123 ↗
15. Yamaura K, Huang Q, Zhang L, Takada K, Baba Y, Nagai T et al 2006 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 944810.1021/ja0612302 ↗
16. Ling C and Mizuno F 2013 Chem. Mater. 25 306210.1021/cm401250c ↗
17. Hill P M, Peiser H S and Rait J R 1956 Acta Crystallogr. 9 98110.1107/S0365110X56002862 ↗
18. Liu X, Wang X, Iyo A, Yu H, Li D and Zhou H 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 1482210.1039/C4TA03349C ↗
19. Datta M K, Kuruba R, Jampani P H, Chung S J, Saha P, Epur R et al 2014 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 188 110.1016/j.mseb.2014.05.007 ↗
20. Sun X, Blanc L, Nolis G M, Bonnick P, Cabana J and Nazar L F 2018 Chem. Mater. 30 12110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03383 ↗
21. Sharma N, Shaju K M, Rao G V S and Chowdari B V R 2003 J. Power Sources 124 20410.1016/S0378-7753(03)00670-0 ↗
22. Rodriguez-Carvajal J 1990 Satellite Meeting on Powder Diffraction of the XV Congress of the IUCr p 127