Synthesis of CdSe and CdSe:Ga nanostructures for antibacterial application
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the preparation of CdSe and CdSe:Ga nanoparticles using two methods: thermal evaporation and pulse laser ablation has been reported. Their structural properties were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). As confirmed by the XRD curves, CdSe and CdSe:Ga nanoparticles exhibited polycrystalline and wurtzite hexagonal structures with orientation planes of (100), (101), (102), (110) and (112). Also, a homogeneous distribution of nano-rod, flower-like, cylindrical, hexagonal and both nano-rod and hexagonal shapes with different diameters was seen by FESEM images. The band gaps of CdSe and CdSe:Ga (without annealed and annealed at temperatures of 150 (6 h) and 500$$\circ $$C (1 h)) were found to be 1.72, 1.7, 1.69 and 1.64 eV, respectively. The antibacterial activity could be increased by annealing CdSe:Ga nanoparticles at 150$$\circ $$C for 6 h in Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis), whereas it is decreased in Gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacter cloacae). Alternatively, annealing CdSe:Ga at 500$$\circ $$C for 1 h led to an increase in the antibacterial activity in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. It is concluded that the antibacterial activity is highly dependent on the type of bacteria, material, preparation conditions and the used methods.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Qinghu Y, Hua C, Kun G, Zhigao H, Shuang G, Peipei L, Jian S et al 2015 J. Alloys Compd. 626 41510.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.153 ↗
2. Kim T W, Lee D U, Choo D C, Kim J H, Jeong J H, Jung M et al 2002 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 63 88110.1016/S0022-3697(01)00243-8 ↗
3. Gondal M A, Drmosh Q A, Yamani Z H and Rashid M 2009 Int. J. Nanoparticles 2 11910.1504/IJNP.2009.028744 ↗
4. Pal J and Chauhan P 2009 Mater. Charact. 60 151210.1016/j.matchar.2009.08.007 ↗
5. Dikovska A O, Atanasova G B, Avdeev G V and Nedyalkov N N 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 374 6510.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.141 ↗
6. Sondi I and Salopek-Sondi B 2004 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 275 17710.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.012 ↗
7. Panáček A, Kvitek L, Prucek R, Kolář M, Večeřová R, Pizúrová N et al J. Phys. Chem. B 110 1624810.1021/jp063826h ↗
8. Lyon D Y, Adams L K, Falkner J C and Alvarez P J 2006 Env. Sci. Tech. 40 436010.1021/es0603655 ↗
9. Kim Y H, Lee D K, Cha H G, Kim C W, Kang Y C and Kang Y S 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 2492310.1021/jp0656779 ↗
10. Li P, Li J, Wu C, Wu Q and Li J 2005 Nanotechnology 16 191210.1088/0957-4484/16/9/082 ↗
11. Du J and Gebicki J M 2004 Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 36 233410.1016/j.biocel.2004.05.012 ↗
12. Saleh R and Djaja N F 2014 Spect. Acta Part A: Mol. Bio. Spec. 130 58110.1016/j.saa.2014.03.089 ↗
13. Al-Fwadi E, Al-Alias M F and Al-Shaikley F 2008 J. Phys. 5 63
14. Thirumavalavan S, Mani Y and Suresh S S 2015 J. Nano- Electr. Phys. 7 04024
15. Kaur J and Tripathi S K 2015 Acta Meta. Sinica (English Letters) 28 59110.1007/s40195-015-0236-6 ↗
16. Dhillon G S, Brar S K, Kaur S and Verma M 2012 Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 32 4910.3109/07388551.2010.550568 ↗