Effect of different parameters on the tribological performance of polypropylene/thermoplastic polyurethane blends under dry sliding conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, polypropylene/thermoplastic polyurethane (PP/TPU) blends (weight ratios of 75/25 and 25/75) were produced by melt blending, and a maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (PP-g-MA) copolymer was used as a coupling agent. The effect of the concentration of the coupling agent (5–11 phr), TPU concentration (25–75%), normal load (2–4 N) and sliding velocity (60–72 rpm) on the wear properties of the blends were characterized through a pin-on-disc abrasive wear test. A $$24$$ full-factorial experimental design was chosen to screen the significant factors and their interactions influencing the tribological performance of the blends. After the tests, the morphology of the worn surface of the samples was observed using scanning electron microscopy. Shore D hardness tests were also conducted and the relationships between these behaviours were analysed on the basis of the findings. According to the wear test results, the factors that have the greatest effect on the wear rates are as follows: normal load, TPU concentration, sliding velocity and PP-g-MA concentration, respectively. The wear rate of the blends increases by increasing the normal load, TPU concentration and sliding speed, and slightly decreases by increasing the PP-g-MA concentration. As expected, the wear and hardness results showed the apparent superiority of the $$\hbox {PP}75/\hbox {TPU}25$$ blends over the $$\hbox {PP}25/\hbox {TPU}75$$ blends, because of the higher content of rigid segments in the blends.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Bajsić E G, Šmit I and Leskovac M 2007 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 104 398010.1002/app.26222 ↗
2. Di Y, Kang M, Zhao Y, Yan S and Wang X 2006 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 99 87510.1002/app.22809 ↗
3. Chuayjuljit S and Ketthongmongkol S 2012 J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 26 92310.1177/0892705711431104 ↗
4. Bajsić E G and Rek V 2004 e-Polymers 4-1 1
5. Lu Q W and Macosko C W 2004 Polymer 45 198110.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.077 ↗
6. Luo J-S, Xu B-P, Yu H-W, Du Y-X and Feng Y-H 2015 Fiber Polym. 16 9510.1007/s12221-015-0095-9 ↗
7. Ajili S H, Ebrahimi N G and Khorasani M T 2003 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 89 249610.1002/app.12180 ↗
8. Bajsić E G, Pustak A, Šmit I and Leskovac M 2010 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 117 137810.1002/app.31997 ↗
9. Kannan M, Joseph K and Thomas S 2015 Plast. Rubber. Compos. 44 24510.1179/1743289815Y.0000000019 ↗
10. Jia S, Qu J, Liu W, Wu C, Chen R, Zhai S et al 2014 Polym. Eng. Sci. 54 71610.1002/pen.23598 ↗
11. Kannan M, Bhagawan S S, Joseph K and Thomas S 2009 J. Compos. Mater. 43 191510.1177/0021998309341849 ↗
12. Pötschke P and Wallheinke K 1999 Polym. Eng. Sci. 39 103510.1002/pen.11492 ↗
13. Lan Y, Liu H, Cao X, Zhao S, Dai K, Yan X et al 2016 Polymer 97 1110.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.017 ↗
14. Jia S, Zhu Y, Wang Z, Chen L and Fu L 2015 J. Polym. Res. 22 110.1007/s10965-014-0642-x ↗
15. Wang X, Mu B and Wang H 2015 Polym. Compos. 36 89710.1002/pc.23009 ↗
16. Chenglong W, Daoyuan P, Qibing W, Ruifang Z and Yuzeng Z 2014 Adv. Mat. Res. 915–916 193
17. Poomali, Siddaramaiah, Suresha B and Lee J-H 2008 Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 492 48610.1016/j.msea.2008.03.018 ↗
18. Li B, Li M, Fan C, Ren M, Wu P, Luo L et al 2015 Compos. Sci. Technol. 106 6810.1016/j.compscitech.2014.11.005 ↗
19. Zhou S, Huang J and Zhang Q 2014 J. Thermoplast. Compos. 27 1810.1177/0892705712439565 ↗
20. Devaraju A, Perumal A E, Alphonsa J, Kailas S V and Venugopal S 2012 Wear 288 1710.1016/j.wear.2012.03.002 ↗
21. Liu T, Wood W, Li B, Lively B and Zhong W-H 2012 Wear 294–295 32610.1016/j.wear.2012.07.010 ↗
22. Prasad B K 2004 Wear 257 11010.1016/j.wear.2003.10.021 ↗
23. Zhang L C, Zarudi I and Xiao K Q 2006 Wear 261 80610.1016/j.wear.2006.01.033 ↗
24. Yu D, Wang C, Cheng X and Zhang F 2008 Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 186510.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.204 ↗
25. Gottipati R and Mishra S 2010 Chem. Eng. J. 160 9910.1016/j.cej.2010.03.015 ↗
26. Antony J 2003 Design of experiments for engineers and scientists (Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann)
27. Yahiaoui M, Denape J, Paris J-Y, Ural A G, Alcalá N and Martínez F J 2014 Wear 315 10310.1016/j.wear.2014.04.005 ↗
28. Da Silva R C L, Da Silva C H and Medeiros J T N 2007 Wear 263 97410.1016/j.wear.2007.01.082 ↗
29. Myshkin N K, Petrokovets M I and Kovalev A V 2005 Tribol. Int. 38 91010.1016/j.triboint.2005.07.016 ↗
30. Mathew M T, Novo J, Rocha L A, Covas J A and Gomes J R 2010 Tribol. Int. 43 140010.1016/j.triboint.2010.01.011 ↗