journal article·2014-05

Influence of temperature and voltage on electrochemical reduction of graphene oxide

Xiuqiang Li, Dong Zhang, Peiying Zhu, Chao Yang

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 37· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, the influence of temperature and voltage on direct electrochemical reduction were discussed in detail. Reduced graphene oxide is characterized with X-ray diffraction (XRD), fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT–IR) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE–SEM). It is found that the reduction degree of graphene oxide (GO) decreases gradually with the increase of applied temperature. The optimal applied temperature found in our experiment is 20 °C; Meanwhile, as the applied voltage increases from 0·1 to 12·5 V, the reduction degree of graphene oxide increases gradually. However, above 2·5 V, increasing voltage has little effect on the reduction degree of graphene oxide.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Akhavan O and Ghaderi E 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C113 20214
2. Balandin A A, Ghosh S, Bao W Z, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao Feng and Lau C N 2008 Nano Lett. 8 90210.1021/nl0731872 ↗
3. Buchsteiner A, Lerf A and Pieper J 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B110 2232810.1021/jp0641132 ↗
4. Cai W W et al 2008 Science 321 181510.1126/science.1162369 ↗
5. Chae H K et al 2004 Nature 427 52310.1038/nature02311 ↗
6. Guo H L et al 2009 ACS Nano 3 265310.1021/nn900227d ↗
7. Jeong H K et al 2008 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 136210.1021/ja076473o ↗
8. Lee C, Wei X and Kysar J W 2008 Science 321 3858
9. Lei Z B, Christov N and Zhao X S 2011 Energy & Environ. Sci. 26 1039
10. Liu S et al 2012 Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 529910.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.023 ↗
11. Muszynski R B, Seger and Kamat P V 2008 J. Phys. Chem. C112 5263
12. Sung J A and Yan W Z 2010 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1 125910.1021/jz100080c ↗
13. Wang Z J et al 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C113 14071
14. Williams G, Seger B and Kamat P V 2008 ACS Nano 2 148710.1021/nn800251f ↗
15. Yang J et al 2012 Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 505610.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.105 ↗
16. Zhang T Y and Zhang D 2011 Bull. Mater. Sci. 34 2510.1007/s12034-011-0048-x ↗
17. Zhu P Y, Zhang D, Xiao S H and Shen M 2011 Phys. BConden. Matter 406 49810.1016/j.physb.2010.11.022 ↗