journal article·2021-09

SILAR-deposited nanostructured ZnO thin films: effect of deposition cycles on surface properties

Aishwarya Santhamoorthy, Parthasarathy Srinivasan, Akshay Krishnakumar, John Bosco Balaguru Rayappan, K Jayanth Babu

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

ZnO thin films were deposited onto the glass substrates using successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) technique by varying the deposition cycles from 25 to 100 in steps of 25 cycles. The effect of deposition cycles on the structural, morphological, optical and electrical properties was investigated and reported. Structural analysis revealed the formation of the hexagonal wurtzite crystal structure of ZnO with the preferential plane orientation of (1 0 0) for all deposition cycles. For the film deposited at 25 cycles alone, we observed the meagre diffraction peak at 2θ = 21.27° corresponds to (1 0 1) plane of the orthorhombic phased zinc sulphate, which indicated the incomplete formation of zinc ammonium complex from the precursor. Morphological analysis revealed the formation of nanorod-like morphology for the deposition cycles of 25 and 50, whereas it was found to be deformed at 75 and 100 cycles. The optical bandgap of the deposited thin films was decreased as a function of deposition cycles. However, at 75 deposition cycles, the bandgap was increased to 3.2468 ± 0.0026 eV, and it could be attributed to the variation in the density of states near the conduction band. The significant variations in the electrical parameters namely, carrier concentration, mobility, electrical resistance as a function of deposition cycles were investigated. The variations in the refractive index and static impedance characteristics as a function of deposition cycles were also studied and reported.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Park K C, Ma D Y and Kim K H 1997 Thin Solid Films 305 20110.1016/S0040-6090(97)00215-0 ↗
2. Özgür Ü, Avrutin V and Morkoç H 2018 Molecular beam epitaxy from research to mass production 2nd edn (Netherlands, Amsterdam: Elsevier) chap 16, p 34310.1016/B978-0-12-812136-8.00016-5 ↗
3. Srinivasan P and Rayappan J B B 2018 Sens. Actuator B Chem. 277 12910.1016/j.snb.2018.09.003 ↗
4. Deng X, Zhang L, Guo J, Chen Q and Ma J 2017 Mater. Res. Bull. 90 17010.1016/j.materresbull.2017.02.040 ↗
5. Mohammed M I 2018 J. Mol. Struct. 1169 910.1016/j.molstruc.2018.05.024 ↗
6. Choudhury A and Maity S 2017 AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 72 13410.1016/j.aeue.2016.11.021 ↗
7. Voss T and Waldvogel S R 2017 Mater. Sci. Semiconduct. Process. 69 5210.1016/j.mssp.2016.11.027 ↗
8. Ghosh S S, Chaubey C and Sil A 2018 Superlattices Microstruct. 125 27110.1016/j.spmi.2018.10.028 ↗
9. Batra K, Sinha N, Goel, Yadav S H, Joseph A J and Kumar B 2018 J. Alloys Compd. 767 100310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.187 ↗
10. Giri P K, Dhara S and Chakraborty R 2010 Mater. Chem. Phys. 122 1810.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.027 ↗
11. Yang P 2001 Adv. Mater. 13 2
12. Park W I, Kim D H, Jung S W and Yi G C 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 423210.1063/1.1482800 ↗
13. Breedon M, Rix C and Kalantar-Zadeh K 2009 Mater. Lett. 63 24910.1016/j.matlet.2008.10.001 ↗
14. Shankar P and Rayappan J B B 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 3813510.1021/acsami.7b11561 ↗
15. Syed Zahirullah S, Joseph Prince J and Fermi Hilbert Inbaraj P 2017 Mater Technol. 32 75510.1080/10667857.2017.1351656 ↗
16. Yuan H and Zhang Y 2004 J. Cryst. Growth 263 11910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.11.084 ↗
17. Choi S C and Sohn S H 2018 Physica E: Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 104 9810.1016/j.physe.2018.07.014 ↗
18. Bhushan B, Murty B S and Mondal K 2018 Adv. Powder Technol. 30 1
19. Choi K S and Chang S P 2018 Mater. Lett. 230 4810.1016/j.matlet.2018.07.031 ↗
20. Sahu K, Choudhary S, Singh J, Kuriakose S, Singhal R and Mohapatra S 2018 Ceram. Int. 44 2309410.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.116 ↗
21. Mali S S, Kim H, Patil P S and Hong C K 2013 Dalton Trans. 42 1696110.1039/c3dt51287h ↗
22. Dhara S and Giri P K 2012 in Nanorods Dr. Orhan Yalçin (ed) (London, UK: IntechOpen) p 1
23. Fölsch S, Hyldgaard P, Koch R and Ploog K H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 410.1103/PhysRevLett.92.056803 ↗
24. Zahirullah S S, Immanuel P, Pravinraj S, Inbaraj P F H and Prince J J 2018 Mater. Lett. 230 110.1016/j.matlet.2018.07.067 ↗
25. Zarębska K, Łęcki T and Skompska M 2018 J. Electroanal. Chem. 819 45910.1016/j.jelechem.2017.12.036 ↗
26. Kumar P S, Raj A D, Mangalaraj D and Nataraj D 2008 Appl. Surface Sci. 255 238210.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.136 ↗
27. Patil V L, Vanalakar S A, Patil P S and Kim J H 2017 Sens. Actuator B Chem. 239 118510.1016/j.snb.2016.08.130 ↗
28. Garza Hernández R, Alfaro Cruz M R, Pineda-Aguilar N, Rivas Aguilar M E, Quevedo López M, Martínez-Guerra E et al 2018 Microscopy and imaging science practical approaches to applied research education A Méndez-Vilas (ed) (Denmark, København Ø: Formatex Research center)
29. Sarma H, Chakrabortty D and Sarma K C 2014 Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 03 1695710.15680/IJIRSET.2014.0310076 ↗
30. Nikam P R, Baviskar P K, Majumder S, Sali J V and Sankapal B R 2018 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 524 14810.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.111 ↗
31. Ashith V K and Gowrish Rao K 2018 IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng. 360 01205810.1088/1757-899X/360/1/012058 ↗
32. Afruz F B, Tafreshi M J, Mohammadizadeh M R and Fazli M 2018 Computer Mater. Sci. 143 23210.1016/j.commatsci.2017.10.045 ↗
33. Yuan J, Yuan R, Wang J, Li Q, Xing X, Liu X et al 2018 Surface Coat. Technol. 352 7410.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.07.090 ↗
34. Akaltun Y, Yildirim M A, Ateş A and Yildirim M 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 230710.1016/j.optcom.2010.12.094 ↗
35. Li J P H, Kennedy E M, Adesina A A and Stockenhuber M 2019 J. Catalysis 369 15710.1016/j.jcat.2018.10.039 ↗
36. Gharagozlou M and Naghibi S 2016 Mater. Res. Bull. 84 7110.1016/j.materresbull.2016.07.029 ↗
37. Anžlovar A, Crnjak Orel Z, Kogej K and Žigon M 2012 J. Nanomater. 2012 Article Id 76087210.1155/2012/760872 ↗
38. Abdelmohsen A H, Rouby W M A E, Ismail N and Farghali A A 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 594610.1038/s41598-017-05750-x ↗
39. Wang J, Yu S and Zhang H 2018 Optik (Stuttg) 180 2010.1016/j.ijleo.2018.11.062 ↗
40. Das D and Mondal P 2014 RSC Adv. 4 3573510.1039/C4RA06063F ↗
41. Khorsand Zak A, Majid W H A, Wang H Z, Yousefi R, Moradi Golsheikh A and Ren Z F 2013 Ultrason. Sonochem. 20 110.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.07.001 ↗
42. Srinivasan P, Kulandaisamy A J, Mani G K, Babu K J, Tsuchiya K and Rayappan J B B 2019 RSC Adv. 9 3022610.1039/C9RA04230J ↗
43. Srikant V and Clarke D R 1997 J. Mater. Res. 12 610.1557/JMR.1997.0193 ↗
44. Hsu C M, Tzou W C, Yang C F and Liou Y J 2015 Materials 8 5
45. Yu Q, Fu W, Yu C, Yang H, Wei R, Sui Y et al 2007 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40 18
46. Huang C C, Wang F H, Wu C C, Huang H H and Yang C F 2018 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8 20610.1186/1556-276X-8-206 ↗
47. Arun Kumar K L, Durgajanani S, Jeyaprakash B G and Rayappan J B B 2013 Sens. Actuator B Chem. 177 1910.1016/j.snb.2012.10.107 ↗
48. Akaltun Y, Astam A, Cerhan A and Çayir T 2016 AIP Conf. Proc. 1722 220001
49. Gupta V P and Ravindra N M 1980 Basic Solid State Phys. 100 2
50. Al Douri Y, Khenata R, Chelahi-Chikr Z, Driz M and Aourag H 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 94 450210.1063/1.1607516 ↗