Investigating the tension load of rubber composites by impact dynamic testing
Source abstract
Abstract
This work deals with establishing the tension load by impact dynamic testing of rubber composite conveyor belts. The value of tension load affects the shape of the used impactor and use of a support system as well as the weight of the ram and the impact height. An increase in the allowable stress when the belt is tensioned was examined during the test, to determine the effect of impact on the tension load. The obtained values of tension load are assessed using basic mathematical and statistical methods. Using the Design of Experiments method, factors that significantly affect the value of the tension load are identified.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Belt Conveyor Systems Engineering · Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Pang Y and Lodewijks G 2012 Proceedings of 9th IEEE international conference on networking, sensing and control p 7910.1109/ICNSC.2012.6204895 ↗
2. Zeng F, Wu Q, Chu X and Yue Z 2015 Measurement 75 23010.1016/j.measurement.2015.05.041 ↗
3. Molnar W, Nugent S, Lindroos M, Apostol M and Varga M 2015 Polym. Test. 42 110.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.12.001 ↗
4. Cordero M J and Pugnaloni L A 2015 Powder Technol. 272 29010.1016/j.powtec.2014.12.017 ↗
5. Mazurkiewicz D 2015 Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 15 41210.1016/j.acme.2014.12.009 ↗
6. Hartlieb R and Wallthor V 1975 Berg-Hüttenmann Monatsh. 120 371
7. Komander H, Hardygóra M, Bajda M, Komander G and Lewandowicz P 2014 Eksploat. Niezawodn.—Maint. Reliab. 16 579
8. Dobrotă D 2015 Procedia Eng. 100 116010.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.479 ↗
9. Amza G, Dobrotă D, Semenescu A and Iancului D 2008 Mater. Plast. 45 377
10. Manas D, Stanek M, Manas M, Ovsik M, Pata V and Cerny J 2011 Proceedings of the 22nd international DAAAM symposium p 415
11. Cerny J, Kyas K, Krumal M, Martin M, Manas D, Manas M and Michal M 2010 Proceedings of the 21st international DAAAM symposium p 1189
12. Liu X, Pang Y and Lodewijks G 2016 Measurement 77 30710.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.041 ↗
13. Jones D R H 1995 Eng. Failure Anal. 2 5910.1016/1350-6307(95)00002-8 ↗
14. Antoniak J 2010 Belt conveyors in underground mining and quarrying energy (in Polish) (Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Ślȧskiej)
15. Liu X, Pang Y and Lodewijks G 2015 Powder Technol. 273 10210.1016/j.powtec.2014.12.040 ↗
16. Spaans C 1991 Bulk Solids Handl. 11 809
17. Miller I 2010 DOE: design and analysis of an experiment using MINITAB® (in Czech) (Praha: Interquality)
18. Montgomery D C 2002 Design and analysis of experiments (New York: John Wiley)
19. Röthemeyer F and Sommer F 2006 Kautschuk technologie (München Wien: Carl Hanser Verlag)
20. Lovely M, Joseph K U and Rani J 2006 Bull. Mater. Sci. 29 9110.1007/BF02709362 ↗