Efficient electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction reaction by phosphorus-doped graphene using supercritical fluid processing
Source abstract
Abstract
Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) plays a vital role in various fields, such as combustion, corrosion and fuel cell applications. Herein, we report the production of phosphorus-doped reduced graphene oxide (P-RGO) using triphenyl phosphine as a phosphorus source and graphene oxide in supercritical fluid method. The ratio of phosphorus source and graphene oxide has been varied to obtain optimum P-doping. P-RGO materials are characterized through X-ray diffractometer, Raman, field emission scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy techniques. The electrocatalytic activity of P-RGO materials are studied using linear sweep voltammetry and their ORR performance are evaluated using linear sweep voltammetry-rotating ring disk electrode studies in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte. Among the three different P-RGO materials, RGO with phosphorus doping (2:1) delivered the best ORR performance (0.75 A mg−1) compared to commercial HiSPEC Pt/C (0.12 A mg−1) catalyst. The enhanced ORR activity could be ascribed to the existence of surface-active phosphorous sites over the RGO sheet surface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang L and Liu L 2019 Bull. Mater. Sci. 42 8510.1007/s12034-019-1798-0 ↗
2. Joghee P, Malik J N, Pylypenko S and O’Hayre R 2015 MRS Energy Sustain. 2 E310.1557/mre.2015.4 ↗
3. Shao M, Chang Q, Dodelet J-P and Chenitz R 2016 Chem. Rev. 116 359410.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 ↗
4. Venarusso L B, Bettini J and Maia G 2016 ChemElectroChem 3 74910.1002/celc.201600046 ↗
5. Aricò A S, Srinivasan S and Antonucci V 2001 Fuel Cells 1 13310.1002/1615-6854(200107)1:2<133::AID-FUCE133>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
6. Selvarani G, Selvaganesh S V, Sridhar P, Pitchumani S and Shukla A K 2011 Bull. Mater. Sci. 34 33710.1007/s12034-011-0089-1 ↗
7. Vukmirovic M B, Zhang J, Sasaki K, Nilekar A U, Uribe F, Mavrikakis M et al 2007 Electrochim. Acta 52 225710.1016/j.electacta.2006.05.062 ↗
8. Wang J X, Inada H, Wu L, Zhu Y, Choi Y, Liu P et al 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 1729810.1021/ja9067645 ↗
9. Stephens I E L, Bondarenko A S, Grønbjerg U, Rossmeisl J and Chorkendorff I 2012 Energy Environ. Sci. 5 674410.1039/c2ee03590a ↗
10. Sebastián D, Serov A, Artyushkova K, Gordon J, Atanassov P, Aricò A S et al 2016 ChemSusChem 9 198610.1002/cssc.201600583 ↗
11. Li R, Wei Z and Gou X 2015 ACS Catal. 5 413310.1021/acscatal.5b00601 ↗
12. Razmjooei F, Singh K P, Bae E J and Yu J-S 2015 J. Mater. Chem. A 3 1103110.1039/C5TA00970G ↗
13. Han J-S, Chung D Y, Ha D-G, Kim J-H, Choi K, Sung Y-E et al 2016 Carbon N. Y. 105 110.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.018 ↗
14. Xiao C, Chen X and Tang Y 2017 Nanotechnology 28 22540110.1088/1361-6528/aa6ec3 ↗
15. Qu L, Liu Y, Baek J and Dai L 2010 ACS Nano 4 132110.1021/nn901850u ↗
16. Yang S, Zhu C, Sun J, He P, Yuan N, Ding J et al 2015 RSC Adv. 5 3334710.1039/C5RA04001A ↗
17. Li R, Wei Z, Gou X and Xu W 2013 RSC Adv. 3 997810.1039/c3ra41079j ↗
18. Zhang C, Mahmood N, Yin H, Liu F and Hou Y 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 493210.1002/adma.201301870 ↗
19. Liu Z-W, Peng F, Wang H-J, Yu H, Zheng W-X and Yang J 2011 Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 50 325710.1002/anie.201006768 ↗
20. Thangasamy P and Sathish M 2015 CrystEngComm 17 589510.1039/C5CE00926J ↗
21. Rangappa D, Sone K, Zhou Y, Kudo T and Honma I 2011 J. Mater. Chem. 21 1581310.1039/c1jm12208h ↗
22. Sathish M, Mitani S, Tomai T and Honma I 2014 J. Mater. Chem. A 2 473110.1039/C3TA15136K ↗
23. Zhou Y, Yen C H, Fu S, Yang G, Zhu C, Du D et al 2015 Green Chem. 17 355210.1039/C5GC00617A ↗
24. Balaji S S, Karnan M, Kamarsamam J and Sathish M 2019 ChemElectroChem 6 149210.1002/celc.201801490 ↗
25. Balaji S S, Karnan M, Anandhaganesh P, Tauquir S M and Sathish M 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 491 56010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.151 ↗
26. Balaji S S, Elavarasan A and Sathish M 2016 Electrochim. Acta 200 3710.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.150 ↗
27. Jr W H and Offeman R 1958 J. Am. Chem. 208 1937
28. Suresh Balaji S, Karnan M and Sathish M 2018 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43 404410.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.101 ↗
29. Anandha Ganesh P and Jeyakumar D 2014 Nanoscale 6 1301210.1039/C4NR04712E ↗
30. Anandha Ganesh P and Jeyakumar D 2017 ChemistrySelect 2 356210.1002/slct.201700670 ↗
31. Carrillo-Rodríguez J C, Alonso-Lemus I L, Siller-Ceniceros A A, Martínez E G, Pizá-Ruiz P, Vargas-Gutiérrez G et al 2017 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 3038310.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.084 ↗
32. Balaji S S and Sathish M 2014 RSC Adv. 4 5225610.1039/C4RA07820A ↗
33. Shinde D B, Vishal V M, Kurungot S and Pillai V K 2015 Bull. Mater. Sci. 38 43510.1007/s12034-014-0834-3 ↗
34. Wang C, Zhou Y, Sun L, Zhao Q, Zhang X, Wan P et al 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 1491210.1021/jp4015959 ↗
35. Wang H, Maiyalagan T and Wang X 2012 ACS Catal. 2 78110.1021/cs200652y ↗
36. Qiao X, Liao S, You C and Chen R 2015 Catalysts 5 98110.3390/catal5020981 ↗
37. Liao S-H, Liu P-L, Hsiao M-C, Teng C-C, Wang C-A, Ger M-D et al 2012 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 457310.1021/ie2026647 ↗
38. Anandha Ganesh P and Jeyakumar D 2017 ChemistrySelect 2 754410.1002/slct.201700992 ↗
39. Anandha Ganesh P and Jeyakumar D 2018 Electrochim. Acta 262 30610.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.002 ↗
40. Kim B J, Lee D U, Wu J, Higins D, Yu A and Chen Z 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 2650110.1021/jp410014a ↗