journal article·2017-10

Phosphate-dependent modulation of antibacterial strategy: a redox state-controlled toxicity of cerium oxide nanoparticles

Bhakti Sargia, Juhi Shah, Ragini Singh, Homica Arya, Maitri Shah, Ajay S Karakoti, Sanjay Singh

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 40· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Specific reactivity of cerium oxide nanoparticles with phosphate ions was used to design a novel antibacterial system. The redox sensitivity of cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeNPs) was used to irreversibly scavenge phosphate ions from the microbial growth media resulting in nutrient starvation in microbes. Cerium oxide nanoparticles surface was engineered with different ratios of ( $$\hbox {Ce}\,{(+3)}/\hbox {Ce}\,{(+4)})$$ cerium oxidation states and the effect of surface oxidation states was evaluated on the antibacterial activity. The nutrient depletion-based antibacterial activity is demonstrated selectively by CeNPs with higher $$\hbox {Ce}\,{(+3)}/\hbox {Ce}\,{(+4)}$$ ratio on the surface. The surface chemistry of $$\hbox {Ce}\,{(+3)}$$ is altered in the presence of phosphate, resulting in the irreversible formation of surface cerium phosphates leading to the loss of its intrinsic superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. It is hypothesized that nutrient starvation by $$\hbox {Ce}\,{(+3)}$$ leads to oxidative stress in microbes which is not neutralized by the altered surface chemistry of CeNPs with high $$(\hbox {Ce}\,{(+3)}/\hbox {Ce}\,{(+4)})$$ ratio. On the contrary, CeNPs with higher $$(\hbox {Ce}\,{(+4)}/\hbox {Ce}\,{(+3)})$$ ratio did not show any reactivity towards phosphate, thus depicted no antibacterial activity, confirming the hypothesis that surface chemistry, rather than size or morphology-dependent toxicity is the main reason for the observed antibacterial activity of CeNPs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Grzybowski B A and Huck W T 2016 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 58510.1038/nnano.2016.116 ↗
2. Herrmann I K 2016 Crit. Care (London, England) 19 23910.1186/s13054-015-0957-y ↗
3. Bobo D, Robinson K J, Islam J, Thurecht K J and Corrie S R 2016 Pharmaceut. Res. 33 237310.1007/s11095-016-1958-5 ↗
4. Yang P, Zheng J, Xu Y, Zhang Q and Jiang L 2016 Colloidal Synthesis and Applications of Plasmonic Metal Nanoparticles. in: Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, FL)10.1002/adma.201601739 ↗
5. Karakoti A S, Shukla R, Shanker R and Singh S 2015 Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci. 215 2810.1016/j.cis.2014.11.004 ↗
6. Manne N D, Arvapalli R, Nepal N, Thulluri S, Selvaraj V, Shokuhfar T et al 2015 Crit. Care Med. 43 e47710.1097/CCM.0000000000001258 ↗
7. Celardo I, De Nicola M, Mandoli C, Pedersen J Z, Traversa E and Ghibelli L 2011 ACS Nano 5 453710.1021/nn200126a ↗
8. Karakoti A, Singh S, Dowding J M, Seal S and Self W T 2010 Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 442210.1039/b919677n ↗
9. Korsvik C, Patil S, Seal S and Self W T 2007 Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, England) 105610.1039/b615134e ↗
10. Karakoti A S, Singh S, Kumar A, Malinska M, Kuchibhatla S V and Wozniak K 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 1414410.1021/ja9051087 ↗
11. Pirmohamed T, Dowding J M, Singh S, Wasserman B, Heckert E and Karakoti A 2010 Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, England) 46 273610.1039/b922024k ↗
12. Liu Q, Ding Y, Yang Y, Zhang L, Sun L, Chen P et al 2016 Mater. Sci. Eng. 59 44510.1016/j.msec.2015.10.046 ↗
13. Asati A, Kaittanis C, Santra S and Perez J M 2011 Anal. Chem. 83 254710.1021/ac102826k ↗
14. Mogensen M, Sammes N M and Tompsett G A 2000 Solid State Ionics 129 6310.1016/S0167-2738(99)00318-5 ↗
15. Corma A, Atienzar P, Garcia H and Chane-Ching J Y 2004 Nat. Mater. 3 39410.1038/nmat1129 ↗
16. Li Y, Li P, Yu H and Bian Y 2016 Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 44 2510.1016/j.etap.2016.04.004 ↗
17. Singh S, Dosani T, Karakoti A S, Kumar A, Seal S and Self W T 2011 Biomaterials 32 674510.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.073 ↗
18. Singh R and Singh S 2015 Colloid. Surf. 132 7810.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.05.005 ↗
19. Pulido-Reyes G, Rodea-Palomares I, Das B S, Sakthivel T S, Leganes F, Rosal R et al 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 1561310.1038/srep15613 ↗
20. Harder W and Dijkhuizen L 1983 Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 37 110.1146/annurev.mi.37.100183.000245 ↗
21. Carpenter S R, Caraco N F, Correll D L, Howarth R W, Sharpley A N and Smith V H 1998 Ecol. Appl. 8 55910.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2 ↗
22. de Jonge V N, Elliott M and Orive E 2002 Hydrobiologia 475 110.1023/A:1020366418295 ↗
23. Chandy S J 2015 Ind. J. Pharmacol. 47 34710.4103/0253-7613.161245 ↗
24. Parikh R Y, Singh S, Prasad B L, Patole, M S, Sastry M and Shouche Y S 2008 Chem. Biochem. 9 1415
25. Srivastava M, Singh S and Self W T 2012 Environ. Health Perspect. 120 5610.1289/ehp.1103928 ↗
26. Singh S, Patel P, Jaiswal S, Prabhune A A, Ramana C V and Prasad B L V 2009 New J. Chem. 33 64610.1039/B811829A ↗
27. Frohlich E E and Frohlich E 2016 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17 50910.3390/ijms17040509 ↗
28. Jones C F and Grainger D W 2009 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61 43810.1016/j.addr.2009.03.005 ↗
29. Gerber L C, Moser N, Luechinger N A, Stark W J and Grass R N 2012 Chem. Commun. (Cambridge, England) 48 386910.1039/c2cc30903c ↗
30. He J, Wang W, Sun F, Shi W, Qi D, Wang K et al 2015 ACS Nano 9 929210.1021/acsnano.5b04236 ↗
31. Scanlan D J, Mann N H and Carr N G 1993 Mol. Microbiol. 10 18110.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb00914.x ↗
32. Dahle J T, Livi K and Arai Y 2015 Chemosphere 119 136510.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.027 ↗
33. Brune M, Hunter J L, Howell S A, Martin S R, Hazlett T L, Corrie J E et al 1998 Biochemistry 37 1037010.1021/bi9804277 ↗
34. Rosenberg H, Russell L M, Jacomb P A and Chegwidden K 1982 J. Bacteriol. 149 12310.1128/JB.149.1.123-130.1982 ↗