journal article·2016-10

Dye-sensitized solar cell and photocatalytic performance of nanocomposite photocatalyst prepared by electrochemical anodization

MOHAMAD MOHSEN MOMENI

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 39· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

This study compares different Fe-doped TiO2 nanostructures in terms of their photocatalytic performance. Iron-doped TiO2 nanostructures (FeTNs) were prepared by in situ anodizing of titanium in a single-step process in the presence of 3, 9, 15 and 21 mM K3Fe(CN)6. Potassium ferricyanide was used as the iron source. Prepared films are amorphous, so these layers were thermally annealed. The effect of iron doping on the photoelectrochemical properties (including dye-sensitized solar cells) and photocatalysis properties (decomposition of methomyl) was investigated. In all investigated cases, the sample C, which was formed by anodizing in a ethylene glycol electrolyte containing 9 mM K3Fe(CN)6, exhibited better performance than the bare TiO2 and FeNTs fabricated using other iron concentrations. This study demonstrated a feasible and simple anodizing method to fabricate an effective, reproducible and inexpensive photocatalyst for various applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Advanced oxidation water treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Zwilling V, Aucouturier M and Darque-Ceretti E 1999 Electrochim. Acta 45 92110.1016/S0013-4686(99)00283-2 ↗
2. Momeni M M, Ghayeb Y and Ghonchegi Z 2015 J. Solid State Electrochem. 19 135910.1007/s10008-015-2758-2 ↗
3. Xia Y and Yin L 2013 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 1862710.1039/c3cp53178c ↗
4. Momeni M M and Ghayeb Y 2015 J. Alloy Compd. 637 39310.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.137 ↗
5. Sun L, Li J, Wang C L, Li S F, Chen H B and Lin C J 2009 Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C 93 187510.1016/j.solmat.2009.07.001 ↗
6. Momeni M M and Ghayeb Y 2015 J. Appl. Electrochem. 45 55710.1007/s10800-015-0836-x ↗
7. So S, Lee K and Schmuki P 2013 Chem. Eur. J. 19 296610.1002/chem.201204135 ↗
8. Liu T and Zhang H 2013 RSC Adv. 3 1625510.1039/c3ra40875b ↗
9. Wang X, Zhao J L, Kang Y, Li L and Xu X 2014 J. Appl. Electrochem. 44 110.1007/s10800-013-0617-3 ↗
10. Muramatsu Y, Jin Q, Fujishima M and Tada H 2012 , Appl. Catal. B 120 7410.1016/j.apcatb.2012.02.012 ↗
11. Momeni M M, Ghayeb Y and Davarzadeh M 2015 J. Electroanal. Chem. 739 14910.1016/j.jelechem.2014.12.030 ↗
12. Momeni M M and Hosseini M G 2014 J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 25 5027
13. Tomašević A, Kiss E, Petrović S and Mijin D 2010 , Desalination 262 22810.1016/j.desal.2010.06.019 ↗
14. Hosseini M G, Momeni M M and Faraji M 2011 , Electroanalysis 23 165410.1002/elan.201000656 ↗
15. Iliev V, Tomova D, Rakovsky S, Eliyas A and Puma G L 2010 J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 327 5110.1016/j.molcata.2010.05.012 ↗
16. Cracia F, Holgado J P, Caballero A and Gonzalez-Elipe A R 2004 J. Phys. Chem. B 108 1746610.1021/jp0484938 ↗
17. Momeni M M and Ghayeb Y 2016 J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 27 1062
18. Momeni M M and Ghayeb Y 2016 J. Iran Chem. Soc. 13 48110.1007/s13738-015-0757-y ↗