Effect of different complexing agents on the magnetic, optical and photocatalytic properties of sol–gel synthesized KBiFe2O5
Source abstract
Abstract
Polycrystalline samples of potassium bismuth ferrite (KBiFe2O5) were synthesized using sol–gel technique employing different complexing agents, like citric acid, maleic acid, sucrose and tartaric acid. Investigation on the influence of different complexing agents on the magnetic, optical and photocatalytic properties of KBiFe2O5 (KBFO) were carried out. X-ray diffraction studies revealed that the pure phase KBiFe2O5 was formed at the calcination temperature of 600°C for complexing agent, sucrose and tartaric acid, whereas in case of the sample prepared using citric acid and maleic acid as complexing agent some impurity peaks were observed. The samples prepared using different complexing agents at 700°C gave pure KBFO polycrystalline samples. So 600–700°C is the suitable calcination temperature for the formation of single-phase KBFO. These results are also confirmed from the thermo-gravimetric and differential scanning calorimetry analysis carried out on the KBFO precursors. It was also observed that the complexing agent has significant influence on the magnetic properties of the material. Maximum induced magnetization of 0.605 emu g−1 has been observed for the sample prepared using tartaric acid at the calcination temperature of 600°C and also magnetization saturated for the maximum applied field of 15 kOe, whereas sample prepared with sucrose as the complexing agent under similar condition did not show saturation in the magnetization and gave magnetization value of 0.096 emu g−1 for the applied filed of 15 kOe. This difference is attributed to the particle size difference obtained with different complexing agents. For the single-phase KBFO samples prepared using citric acid, maleic acid, sucrose and tartaric acid at calcination temperature of 700°C, the magnetization values are 0.08, 0.0561, 0.044 and 0.0471 emu g−1, respectively. Optical properties of the samples were studied using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. All the samples exhibited strong absorption in the visible region of the solar spectrum and featured a bandgap of 1.75 eV. Evaluation of the visible light-induced photocatalytic activity of pure-phase KBFO was also carried out by degradation of methylene blue as a model pollutant.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Boullay P, Dorcet V, Pérez O, Grygiel C, Prellier W, Mercey B et al 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 18410810.1103/PhysRevB.79.184108 ↗
2. Yang Y, Cao Z, Jiang Y, Liu L and Sun Y 2006 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 132 31110.1016/j.mseb.2006.03.031 ↗
3. Shin S, Yonemura M and Ikawa H 1978 Mater. Res. Bull. 13 101710.1016/0025-5408(78)90166-6 ↗
4. Zhang G, Wu H, Li G, Huang Q, Yang C, Huang F et al 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 126510.1038/srep01265 ↗
5. Zhai X Z, Deng H M, Zhou W L, Yang P X, Chua J H and Zheng Z 2015 RSC Adv. 5 8235110.1039/C5RA16030H ↗
6. Zhang M, Wang Z, Lin S, Wang Y and Pan Y 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 699 56110.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.041 ↗
7. Grinberg I, Vincent-West D, Torres M, Gou G, Stein D M, Wu L et al 2013 Nature 503 50910.1038/nature12622 ↗
8. Zhai X, Deng H, Zhou W, Yang P, Chu J and Zheng Z 2015 Mater. Lett. 161 42310.1016/j.matlet.2015.09.018 ↗
9. Vavilapalli D S, Srikanti K, Mannam R, Tiwari B, Mohan Kant K, Ramachandra Rao M S et al 2018 ACS Omega 3 1664310.1021/acsomega.8b01744 ↗
10. Jalaja M A and Dutta S 2017 Mater. Res. Bull. 88 910.1016/j.materresbull.2016.12.008 ↗
11. Rai R and Molli M 2019 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 30 4318
12. Vavilapalli D S, Melvin A A, Kavita S, Yadav A K, Jha S N, Bhattacharyya D et al 2019 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 200 10994010.1016/j.solmat.2019.109940 ↗
13. Zhang G, Liu F, Gu T, Zhao Y, Li N, Yang W et al 2017 Adv. Electron. Mater. 3 160049810.1002/aelm.201600498 ↗
14. Aslibeiki B, Kameli P and Ehsani M H 2016 Ceram. Int. 42 1278910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.041 ↗
15. Ilić N I, Džunuzović A S, Bobić J D, Stojadinović B S, Hammer P, Vijatović Petrović M M et al 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 6910.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.020 ↗
16. Ghosh S, Dasgupta S, Sen A and Maiti H S 2005 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88 134910.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00306.x ↗
17. Briand G G, Burford N 2000 Adv. Inorg. Chem. 50 28510.1016/S0898-8838(00)50007-5 ↗
18. Ehsani M H, Raoufi T and Razavi F S 2019 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 475 48410.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.131 ↗
19. Wang X, Lin Y, Ding X and Jiang J 2011 J. Alloys Compd. 509 658510.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.074 ↗
20. Xu J, Wang W, Shang M, Sun S, Ren J and Zhang L 2010 Appl. Catal. B: Environmental 93 22710.1016/j.apcatb.2009.09.033 ↗
21. Boroski M, Rodrigues A C, Garcia J C, Sampaio L C, Nozaki J and Hioka N 2008 J. Hazard. Mater. 162 44810.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.062 ↗
22. Pirkanniemi K and Sillanpää M 2002 Chemosphere 48 104710.1016/S0045-6535(02)00168-6 ↗
23. Mondal S, De Anda Reyes Ma E and Pal U 2017 RSC Adv. 7 863310.1039/C6RA28640B ↗