journal article·2016-02

A low cost, light weight cenosphere–aluminium composite for brake disc application

V SARAVANAN, P R THYLA, S R BALAKRISHNAN

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 39· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The commonly used composite material for brake rotor consists of silicon carbide (SiC) or aluminium oxide (Al2O3) particles which are more expensive. The weight of conventionally used composite is more compared to base alloy. The aim of this paper is to develop a light weight material for brake disc applications thereby substituting base alloy and conventional composite. This analysis led to 10 vol% cenosphere reinforced aluminium alloy (AA) 6063 composite as the most appropriate material for brake disc. To ensure the manufacturability of composite, composite brake rotor was casted using the sand casting technique and was machined to achieve the final component. Thermal capability of brake disc was ensured by studying temperature variation through vehicle testing procedure of disc brake. Cost reduction is one of the important benefit acquired using cenosphere reinforced composite. This was ensured by cost estimation and analysis. The cost estimated to manufacture the AA6063 brake disc was compared with composite cost.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Brake Systems and Friction Analysis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Material Selection and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Withers G and Zheng R 2008 ULTALITE—a low cost, lightweight aluminium metal matrix composite for braking applications (Australia: Autoengineer) p 20
2. Niazi A, Dai J S, Balabani S and Seneviratne L 2006 J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 128 56310.1115/1.2137750 ↗
3. Zaid M A, Radzai R, Ahmad M M, Ridzuan A H, Nurfaizey and Afzanizam M M R 2009 J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 3 37
4. Kim N H, Won D, Burris D, Holtkamp B, Gessel G R, Swanson P and Sawyer G W 2005 Wear 258 178710.1016/j.wear.2004.12.014 ↗
5. Bayas E and Aher V 2012 Int. J. Adv. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2 6
6. Belhocine A and Bouchetara M 2013 Trans. Control Mech. Syst. 2 302
7. Singh H and Shergill H 2012 Int. J. Emerg. Technol. 3 84
8. Petinrin M O and Oji J O 2012 N. Y. Sci. J. 5 39
9. Rudolph M, Popp K and Hogenkamp W 2003 Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 3 12410.1002/pamm.200310339 ↗
10. Adebisi A A, Maleque M A and Shah Q H 2011 Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. 6 356
11. Jiang L, Jiang Y-L, Yu L, Su N and Ding Y-D 2012, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 22 278310.1016/S1003-6326(11)61533-1 ↗
12. Blau P J, Jolly B C, Qu J, Peter W H and Blue C A 2007 Wear 263 86710.1016/j.wear.2007.01.131 ↗
13. Chengal Reddy V, Gunasekhar Reddy M and Gowd H. 2013, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 3 283
14. Belhocine A and Bouchetara M 2012 Wseas Trans. Appl. Theor. Mech. 7 169
15. Manjunath T V and Suresh P M 2013 Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2 7741
16. Kang S-S and Cho S-K 2012, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 26 213310.1007/s12206-012-0530-4 ↗
17. Chougule R G and Ravi B 2005 Int. J. Prod. Res. 39 625
18. Rodriguez R I and Jia Y 2011 Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst. 4 325
19. Huang Y M and Chen S H 2006 Analytical study of design parameters on cooling performance of a brake (SAE 2006-01-0692)10.4271/2006-01-0692 ↗
20. Adamowicz A and Grzes P 2011 Appl. Therm. Eng. 31 217710.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.05.016 ↗
21. Cardone G, Astarita T and Carlomagno G M 1997 Int. J. Rotating Mach. 3 110.1155/S1023621X97000018 ↗