Simulation of the burning and dripping cables in fire using the particle finite element method
Source abstract
Abstract
The behavior of the cable jacket in fire characterized by the tendency to melt and drip constitutes a major source of fire hazard. The reason is that the melted material may convey the flame from one point to another, expanding fire and contributing to the fire load. In this article, the capability of a new computational strategy based on the particle finite element method for simulating a bench-scale cables burning test is analyzed. The use bench-scale test has been previously used to simulate the full-scale test described in EN 50399. As the air effect is neglected, a simple combustion model is included. The samples selected are two cables consisting of a copper core and differently flame retarded thermoplastic polyurethane sheets. The key modeling parameters were determined from different literature sources as well as experimentally. During the experiment, the specimen was burned under the test set-up condition recording the process and measuring the temperature evolution by means of three thermocouples. Next, the test was reproduced numerically and compared with a real fire test. The numerical results show that the particle finite element method can accurately predict the evolution of the temperature and the melting of the jacket.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire dynamics and safety research · Flame retardant materials and properties · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre Internacional de Mètodes Numèrics en Enginyeria (CIMNE), Barcelona, Spain
Bundesanstalt fur Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Berlin, Germany
Funding
COMETAD project · Jose Castillejo” Programme · CERCA programme of the Generalitat de Catalunya · Severo Ochoa” Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Cogen JM · Fire Retard Polym Mater · 2010 · 2010 · 783
2. Huang X · Fire Technol · 2019 · 10 · 146
3. 50399 EN · Test apparatus, procedures, results[J] · 2011
4. 10.1002/fam.241710.1002/fam.2417 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.04710.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.047 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.10300610.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103006 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.03310.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.033 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10973-020-09575-110.1007/s10973-020-09575-1 ↗
9. 10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.8-112110.3801/IAFSS.FSS.8-1121 ↗
10. Nowlen SP · 2008
11. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.01.00310.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.01.003 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.06.00410.1016/j.firesaf.2012.06.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.03.05210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.03.052 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10694-021-01137-7.10.1007/s10694-021-01137-7. ↗
15. 10.1002/fam.225710.1002/fam.2257 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10694-018-0769-010.1007/s10694-018-0769-0 ↗
17. 10.1002/nme.435710.1002/nme.4357 ↗
18. 10.1002/fld.419010.1002/fld.4190 ↗
19. 10.1142/S021987620400020410.1142/S0219876204000204 ↗
20. 10.1145/174462.15663510.1145/174462.156635 ↗
21. Delaunay B · Otdel Matem I Estestv Nauk · 1934 · 7 · 793
22. 10.1002/nme.109610.1002/nme.1096 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00466-008-0245-710.1007/s00466-008-0245-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.03.00710.1016/j.cma.2019.03.007 ↗
25. Marti J, Idelsohn SR, Limache A, et al. A fully coupled particle method for quasi incompressible fluid-hypoelastic structure interactions, 2006, https://cimec.org.ar/ojs/index.php/mc/article/view/537
26. 10.1016/j.cma.2007.06.00410.1016/j.cma.2007.06.004 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00466-010-0522-010.1007/s00466-010-0522-0 ↗
28. Cremonesi M · Int J Num Method Eng · 2010 · 84 · 61010.1002/nme.2911 ↗
29. 10.1007/s40571-016-0122-710.1007/s40571-016-0122-7 ↗
30. 10.1002/nme.543910.1002/nme.5439 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.01.02110.1016/j.cma.2019.01.021 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cma.2009.04.00210.1016/j.cma.2009.04.002 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00466-009-0448-610.1007/s00466-009-0448-6 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-94-007-0735-1_510.1007/978-94-007-0735-1_5 ↗
35. Oñate E · Comput Assist Method Eng Sci · 2013 · 20 · 165
36. 10.1016/j.cma.2004.10.01810.1016/j.cma.2004.10.018 ↗
37. 10.1007/s40571-016-0114-710.1007/s40571-016-0114-7 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.09.00710.1016/j.compstruc.2016.09.007 ↗
39. 10.1002/nme.273110.1002/nme.2731 ↗
40. Butler K · Proc Interf Conf · 2007 · 2007 · 2
41. Butler K. · Conf Proc: Fire Mater · 2009 · 911 · 012009
42. 10.1002/fam.217610.1002/fam.2176 ↗
43. Matzen M
44. Kundu PK · 2002
45. 10.1108/0264440131130485410.1108/02644401311304854 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11831-010-9045-210.1007/s11831-010-9045-2 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.07.01110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.07.011 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.07.01510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.07.015 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.08.00410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.08.004 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.00110.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.001 ↗
51. 10.1177/073490411456558110.1177/0734904114565581 ↗
52. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199901/02)23:1<49::AID-FAM668>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199901/02)23:1<49::AID-FAM668>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
53. Harper CA · 2004
54. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.02410.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.024 ↗
55. 10.1002/fam.100310.1002/fam.1003 ↗
56. 10.1177/104239150505316310.1177/1042391505053163 ↗