Influence of Cl-, Br-, NO 3 - and SO 4 2- ions on the corrosion behaviour of 6061 Al alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of anions like Cl-, Br-, NO3- and SO42- on the anodic dissolution of the monolithic Al 6061 alloy have been investigated at neutral pH through immersion testing and electrochemical techniques like potentiodynamic polarization and a.c. impedance spectroscopy. Scanning electron microscopy was employed to characterize the corroded surface and to observe the extent of pitting in different media. From the evaluated corrosion parameters it was found that the dissolution of the matrix was extensively reduced in presence of aqueous solutions containing Br-, NO3- and SO42- ions while Cl- ions aggravated corrosion by penetrating into the barrier oxide film on the surface of the material. Pronounced effect of pitting was observed in presence of Cl- and the level of pitting in NO3- and Br- were mild. In presence of SO42- ions passivity was extended over a wide potential range and breakdown of passivity occurs when the material was polarized beyond pitting potential. The departure of capacitive behaviour towards resistive behaviour was clearly observed through impedance measurements when investigations were conducted in Cl- media and in presence of the other electrolytes. Corrosion rates were, however, controlled during prolonged exposure in the electrolytic media, specially in case of chloride media, due to the predominance of film repair kinetics.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Ambat R and Dwarakadasa E S 1994J. Appl. Electrochem. 24 91110.1007/BF00348781 ↗
2. ASTM Standards: parts 3 and 4, Annual Book G31 1977Recommended practice for laboratory immersion corrosion testing of metals (West Conshohocken, P.A.: ASTM International) p. 722
3. Bohni H and Uhlig H H 1969J. Electrochem. Soc. 116 90610.1149/1.2412167 ↗
4. Chavanin T U 1991Corrosion 47 47210.5006/1.3585281 ↗
5. Conde A and Damborenea J de 1998Electrochim. Acta 43 84910.1016/S0013-4686(97)00218-1 ↗
6. Das T, Bandyopadhyay S and Blairs S 1994J. Mater. Sci. 29 568010.1007/BF00349964 ↗
7. Das T, Munroe P R and Bandyopadhyay S 1996J. Mater. Sci. 31 535110.1007/BF01159304 ↗
8. Datta J, Bhattacharya C, Sarkar D and Bandyopadhyay S 2003J. Institution of Engineers (India) 84 79
9. Datta J, Datta S, Banerjee M K and Bandyopadhyay S 2004Composite Part A: applied science and manufacturing 35 100310.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.012 ↗
10. Fontana M G 1987Corrosion engineering (Singapore: McGraw-Hill Inc)
11. Greenwood N N and Earnshaw 1989Chemistry of the elements (ed.) Maxwell McMillan Int. (Singapore: Pergamon Press)
12. Guillaumin V and Mankowski G 2000Corros. Sci. 42 10510.1016/S0010-938X(99)00053-0 ↗
13. Kahanda G L M K S and Tomkiewicz M 1990J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 342310.1149/1.2086233 ↗
14. Kotsikos G, Sutcliffe J M and Holroyd N J H 2000Corros. Sci. 42 1710.1016/S0010-938X(99)00047-5 ↗
15. McCafferty E 2003Corros. Sci. 45 142110.1016/S0010-938X(02)00231-7 ↗
16. Mcdonald J R 1987Impedance spectroscopy (New York: John Wiley and Sons)
17. Metikos-Hukovic M, Babic R, Grubac Z and Brinic S 1994J. Appl. Electrochem. 24 77210.1007/BF00578093 ↗
18. Pyun S-I, Moon S-M, Ahn S-H and Kim S-S 1999Corros. Sci. 41 65310.1016/S0010-938X(98)00132-2 ↗
19. Stella M and Micheli De 1978Corros. Sci. 18 60510.1016/0010-938X(78)90054-9 ↗
20. Tomcsanyi L, Varga K, Bartik I, Horanyi G and Maleczki E 1989Electrochim. Acta 34 85510.1016/0013-4686(89)87119-1 ↗