journal article·2019-02Open access

Low-level NO gas sensing properties of $$\hbox {Zn}1-x\hbox {Sn}x\hbox {O}$$ Zn 1 - x Sn x O nanostructure sensors under UV light irradiation at room temperature

Irmak Karaduman Er, Ali Orkun Çağirtekin, Tuğba Çorlu, Memet Ali Yildirim, Aytunç Ateş, Selim Acar

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 1

Abstract

Zn1-xSnxO (x=0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20) nanostructures have been grown through the successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction method. The structural, morphological and compositional properties of the nanostructures have been characterized through X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray analysis, respectively. The NO gas sensing properties of sensors to 20ppb have been systematically investigated in the dark and under UV light irradiation. A Zn0.90Sn0.10O sensor has exhibited the highest response for 20ppb NO gas compared with other sensors. The sensor response has increased from 1.9 to 43% depending on the UV light irradiation for the Zn0.90Sn0.10O sensor. Zn0.90Sn0.10O nanostructure can be used as a suitable gas sensor material for detection of low concentration levels of NO gas.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · ZnO doping and properties · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Geng Q, He Z, Chen X, Dai W and Wang X 2013 Sens. Actuators B 188 29310.1016/j.snb.2013.07.001 ↗
2. Mirzaei A, Park S, Kheel H, Sun G-J, Lee S and Lee C 2016 Ceram. Int. 42 618710.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.179 ↗
3. Panda S K and Jacob C 2009 Bull. Mater. Sci. 32 4910.1007/s12034-009-0073-1 ↗
4. Cho M and Park I 2016 J. Sens. Sci. Technol. 25 10310.5369/JSST.2016.25.2.103 ↗
5. Patıl P, Gaıkwad G, Patıl D R and Naık J 2016 Bull. Mater. Sci. 39 65510.1007/s12034-016-1208-9 ↗
6. Yıldırım M A, Tuna Yıldırım S and Ateş A 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 701 3710.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.092 ↗
7. Yıldırım M A, Akaltun Y and Ateş A 2012 Solid State Sci. 14 128210.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.07.012 ↗
8. Çorlu T, Karaduman I, Yildirim M A, Ates A and Acar S 2017 J. Electron. Mater. 46 710.1007/s11664-017-5503-z ↗
9. Karaduman I, Er E, Celikkan H and Acar S 2015 Sens. Actuators B 221 118810.1016/j.snb.2015.07.063 ↗
10. https://www.webelements.com/periodicity/ionic_radius_2_tet/
11. Yoo R, Cho S, Song M J and Lee W 2015 Sens. Actuators B 221 21710.1016/j.snb.2015.06.076 ↗
12. Panda J, Sasmal I and Nath T K 2016 AIP Adv. 6 03511810.1063/1.4944837 ↗
13. Zhang Z, Yi J B, Ding J, Wong L M, Seng H L, Wang S J et al 2008 J. Phys. Chem. C 112 957910.1021/jp710837h ↗
14. Sharma A, Tomar M and Gupta V 2001 Sens. Actuators B 156 74310.1016/j.snb.2011.02.033 ↗
15. Xie W, Liu B, Xiao S, Li H, Wang Y, Cai D et al 2015 Sens. Actuators B 215 12510.1016/j.snb.2015.03.051 ↗
16. Espid E and Taghipour F 2017 Sens. Actuators B 241 82810.1016/j.snb.2016.10.129 ↗
17. Luo L, Sosnowchik B D and Lin L 2010 Nanotechnology 21 49550210.1088/0957-4484/21/49/495502 ↗
18. Koo W-T, Choi S-J, Kim N-H, Jang J-S and Kim I-D 2016 Sens. Actuators B 223 30110.1016/j.snb.2015.09.095 ↗
19. JeongY-J, Balamurugan C and Lee D-W 2016 Sens. Actuators B 229 28810.1016/j.snb.2015.11.093 ↗
20. Karaduman I, Barin Ö, Yıldız D E and Acar S 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 118 17450110.1063/1.4935139 ↗