Low-level NO gas sensing properties of $$\hbox {Zn}1-x\hbox {Sn}x\hbox {O}$$ Zn 1 - x Sn x O nanostructure sensors under UV light irradiation at room temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
Zn1-xSnxO (x=0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20) nanostructures have been grown through the successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction method. The structural, morphological and compositional properties of the nanostructures have been characterized through X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray analysis, respectively. The NO gas sensing properties of sensors to 20ppb have been systematically investigated in the dark and under UV light irradiation. A Zn0.90Sn0.10O sensor has exhibited the highest response for 20ppb NO gas compared with other sensors. The sensor response has increased from 1.9 to 43% depending on the UV light irradiation for the Zn0.90Sn0.10O sensor. Zn0.90Sn0.10O nanostructure can be used as a suitable gas sensor material for detection of low concentration levels of NO gas.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · ZnO doping and properties · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Geng Q, He Z, Chen X, Dai W and Wang X 2013 Sens. Actuators B 188 29310.1016/j.snb.2013.07.001 ↗
2. Mirzaei A, Park S, Kheel H, Sun G-J, Lee S and Lee C 2016 Ceram. Int. 42 618710.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.179 ↗
3. Panda S K and Jacob C 2009 Bull. Mater. Sci. 32 4910.1007/s12034-009-0073-1 ↗
4. Cho M and Park I 2016 J. Sens. Sci. Technol. 25 10310.5369/JSST.2016.25.2.103 ↗
5. Patıl P, Gaıkwad G, Patıl D R and Naık J 2016 Bull. Mater. Sci. 39 65510.1007/s12034-016-1208-9 ↗
6. Yıldırım M A, Tuna Yıldırım S and Ateş A 2017 J. Alloys Compd. 701 3710.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.092 ↗
7. Yıldırım M A, Akaltun Y and Ateş A 2012 Solid State Sci. 14 128210.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.07.012 ↗
8. Çorlu T, Karaduman I, Yildirim M A, Ates A and Acar S 2017 J. Electron. Mater. 46 710.1007/s11664-017-5503-z ↗
9. Karaduman I, Er E, Celikkan H and Acar S 2015 Sens. Actuators B 221 118810.1016/j.snb.2015.07.063 ↗
10. https://www.webelements.com/periodicity/ionic_radius_2_tet/
11. Yoo R, Cho S, Song M J and Lee W 2015 Sens. Actuators B 221 21710.1016/j.snb.2015.06.076 ↗
12. Panda J, Sasmal I and Nath T K 2016 AIP Adv. 6 03511810.1063/1.4944837 ↗
13. Zhang Z, Yi J B, Ding J, Wong L M, Seng H L, Wang S J et al 2008 J. Phys. Chem. C 112 957910.1021/jp710837h ↗
14. Sharma A, Tomar M and Gupta V 2001 Sens. Actuators B 156 74310.1016/j.snb.2011.02.033 ↗
15. Xie W, Liu B, Xiao S, Li H, Wang Y, Cai D et al 2015 Sens. Actuators B 215 12510.1016/j.snb.2015.03.051 ↗
16. Espid E and Taghipour F 2017 Sens. Actuators B 241 82810.1016/j.snb.2016.10.129 ↗
17. Luo L, Sosnowchik B D and Lin L 2010 Nanotechnology 21 49550210.1088/0957-4484/21/49/495502 ↗
18. Koo W-T, Choi S-J, Kim N-H, Jang J-S and Kim I-D 2016 Sens. Actuators B 223 30110.1016/j.snb.2015.09.095 ↗
19. JeongY-J, Balamurugan C and Lee D-W 2016 Sens. Actuators B 229 28810.1016/j.snb.2015.11.093 ↗
20. Karaduman I, Barin Ö, Yıldız D E and Acar S 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 118 17450110.1063/1.4935139 ↗