journal article·2001-10

Effect of cationic size in Hg(Tl/Bi)Ba2Ca2Cu3O8+δ on superconducting and microstructural characteristics

Rajiv Giri, H. K. Singh, R. S. Tiwari, O. N. Srivastava

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 24· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper we have reported investigations on the effect of simultaneous substitution of Bi and Tl at the Hg site in the oxygen deficient HgOδ layer of HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ cuprate superconductor. Bulk polycrystalline samples have been prepared by the two-step solid state reaction process (precursor route). It has been observed that the as grown HgBi0.2−xTIxBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ (withx = 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20) corresponds to the 1223 phase. It has been found that the Tc varies with the average cationic size of the dopant cations. The optimumTc of ∼ 131 K has been found for the composition HgBi0.15TI0.05Ba2Ca2Cu3O8+δ This composition leads to the average dopant cation size of ∼1.108 a which is very close to the size of Hg2+ (∼ 111 a). The microstructure for HgBi0.15TI0.05Ba2Ca2Cu3O8+δ has been found to be most dense and this phase exhibits the highest stability. The Jc of the optimum material HgBi0.15TI0.05Ba2Ca2Cu3O8+δ is found to be ∼ 1.29 × 103 A/cm2 at 77 K.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys · Superconducting Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Balchev N, Allemeersch F Van, Persyn F, Schroeder J, Deltour R and Hoste S 1997Supercond. Sci. Technol. 10 6510.1088/0953-2048/10/1/010 ↗
2. Chmaissem O, Guptasarma P, Welp U, Hinks D G and Jorgensen J D 1997Physica C 292 30510.1016/S0921-4534(97)01746-2 ↗
3. Fujii Hiroki, Kumakura Hiroaki and Togano Kazumasa 1999IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 9 1051
4. Kirschner I, Laiho R, Lukács P, Bodi A C, Lukács M D, LÄhderanta E and Zsolt G 1996Z. Phys. B99 501
5. Li J Q, Lam C C, Hung K C and Shen L J 1998Physica C 304 13310.1016/S0921-4534(98)00286-X ↗
6. Li Y, Sastry P V P S S, Knoll D C, Peterson S C and Schwartz J 1999IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 91 176710.1109/77.784797 ↗
7. Meng R L, Hickey B R, Sun Y Y, Cao Y, Kinalidis C, Meen J K, Xue Y Y and Chu C W 1996Physica C 260 110.1016/0921-4534(96)00126-8 ↗
8. Pandey A K, Verma G D and Srivastava O N 1998Physica C 306 4710.1016/S0921-4534(98)00287-1 ↗
9. Putilin S N, Antipov E V, Chmaissem O and Marezio M 1993Nature (London) 362 22610.1038/362226a0 ↗
10. Sastry P V P S S, Amm K M, Knoll D C, Peterson S C and Schwartz J 1998aPhysica C 297 22310.1016/S0921-4534(97)01861-3 ↗
11. Sastry P V P S S, Amm K M, Knoll D C, Peterson S C and Schwartz J 1998bPhysica C300 12510.1016/S0921-4534(98)00106-3 ↗
12. Shao H Met al 1994Solid State Commun. 92 59510.1016/0038-1098(94)00516-8 ↗
13. Sun G F, Wong K W, Xu B R, Xin Y and Lu D F 1994Phys Letts A192 12210.1016/0375-9601(94)91026-X ↗