Effect of electro-co-deposition parameters on surface mechanical properties of Cu–TiO2 composite coating
Source abstract
Abstract
The present work describes processing and properties of Cu–TiO2 electrodeposited coating on copper substrate with optimized current density and ultrafine ceramic TiO2 powder in the plating bath. Direct current electrodeposition process was employed to develop the composite coating with Cu matrix and ceramic oxide (TiO2) nanoparticles as reinforcement on copper substrate. The coatings were developed with 0 (unreinforced), 10 and 30 g l −1 TiO2 powder in bath, at four different current densities (5, 8, 11 and 14 A dm −2 ) to study the effect of current density and particle concentration in bath on the structure and properties of the developed coatings. Phase, microstructure and compositional analysis of the coatings were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), respectively. Hardness and wear resistance of the coatings were analysed by using microhardness tester and ball on plate wear tester and improvement in these properties was observed due to particle reinforcement and crystallographic texture.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Dieter G E 1988 Mechanical metallurgy (Singapore: McGraw Hill)
2. Durney L J 1985 Electroplating engineering handbook (Van Nostrand Reinhold Company) 4th ed, pp 36410.1007/978-1-4613-2547-5 ↗
3. Boonyongmaneerat Y, Saengkiettiyut K, Saenapitak S and Sangsuk S 2009 Surf. Coat. Technol. 203 359010.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.05.027 ↗
4. Gurrappa I and Binder L 2008 Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 9 043001 (pp 1)10.1088/1468-6996/9/4/043001 ↗
5. Low C T J, Wills R G A and Walsh F C 2006 Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 37110.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.123 ↗
6. Lee H K, Lee H Y and Jeon J M 2007 Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 471110.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.10.004 ↗
7. Gul H, Kilic F, Aslan S, Alp A and Akbulut H 2009 Wear 267 97610.1016/j.wear.2008.12.022 ↗
8. Stojak J L, Fransaer J and Talbot J B 2002 In Advances in Electrochemical Science and Engineering (eds) Alkire R C and Kolb D M (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag)
9. Saha R K and Khan T I 2010 Surf. Coat. Technol. 205 89010.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.035 ↗
10. Rashidi A M and Amadeh A 2008 Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 377210.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.01.018 ↗
11. Stankovic V D and Gojo M 1996 Surf. Coat. Technol. 81 22510.1016/0257-8972(95)02486-7 ↗
12. Lajevardi S A and Shahrabi T 2010 Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 677510.1016/j.apsusc.2010.04.088 ↗
13. Zhang J M, Zhang Y and Xu K W 2005 J. Cryst. Growth 285 42710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.08.037 ↗
14. Ramalingam S, Muralidharan V S and Subramania A 2009 J. Solid State Electrochem. 13 177710.1007/s10008-009-0870-x ↗
15. Thiemig D, Lange R and Bund A 2007 Electrochim. Acta 52 736210.1016/j.electacta.2007.06.009 ↗
16. Singh D K and Singh V B 2011 J. Electrochem. Soc. 158 11410.1149/1.3525594 ↗
17. Zhang J M, Zhang Y, Xu K W and Ji V 2008 Mater. Lett. 62 132810.1016/j.matlet.2007.08.038 ↗
18. Wang J F, Ma D Y, Xu K W and Liu M 2010 Adv. Mater. Res. 609 8910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.89-91.609 ↗
19. Hou K H, Ger M D, Wang L M and Ke S T 2002 Wear 253 99410.1016/S0043-1648(02)00222-3 ↗
20. Aruna S T, William Grips V K and Rajam K S 2009 J. Alloys Compd. 468 54610.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.058 ↗