journal article·2019-10

Evaluation of anticorrosive behaviour of ZnO nanotetra-pods on a AZ91-grade Mg alloy

R Brindha, S S Raja Ajith, M Nandhini, M Selvam, Kittitat Subannajui, Kittikhun Khotmungkhun, K Sakthipandi

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Highly cross-linked zinc oxide (ZnO) with the nanorod morphology of tetra-pods was successfully prepared using a microwave irradiation (MWI) technique. In comparison with the available conventional techniques, the MWI technique has the advantage of producing different morphological structures with high purity and in a shorter reaction time. These tetra-pods consist of a ZnO core in the zinc blende from which four ZnO arms emerge in the wurtzite structure. In this investigation, the effects of irradiation times and the growth mechanism of ZnO nanotetra-pods were discussed. The structural, morphological and optical properties of ZnO nanorods were investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, an ultra violet visible spectrometry and energy-dispersive spectroscopy. The electrochemical corrosion behaviours of an AZ91-grade Mg alloy and a ZnO/PN nanotetra-pod-coated Mg alloy were investigated. The Tafel plot revealed that the corrosion of Mg drastically decreased on coating with a thin layer of ZnO nanotetra-pods and PN (Mg/PN/ZnO) compared to Mg in a KOH electrolyte.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Ram M K, Stefanakos E K and Yogi Goswami D 2013 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 16 207010.1016/j.mssp.2013.06.017 ↗
2. Witte F, Hort N, Vogt C, Cohen S, Kainer K U, Willumeit R et al 2008 Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 12 6310.1016/j.cossms.2009.04.001 ↗
3. Aochekpe N, Olorunfemi P O and Ngwuluka N C 2009 Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 8 265
4. Erdem Alaca B 2013 Int. Mater. Rev. 54 24510.1179/174328009X411190 ↗
5. Toranzos V J, Portiz G, Luis Mochan W and Zerbino J O 2017 Mater. Res. Express 4 110.1088/2053-1591/aa58bd ↗
6. Selvam M, Srither S R, Saminathan K and Rajendran V 2016 J. Ion. 9 1622
7. Paula D R and Robeson L M 2008 Polymer 49 318710.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017 ↗
8. Janotti A and Van de Walle C G 2009 Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 110.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126501 ↗
9. Fouad O A, Dai Q, Khader A E R S and Samy Ei-shall M 2011 J. Nanopart. Res. 13 707510.1007/s11051-011-0620-8 ↗
10. Zhu L and Zeng W 2017 Sens. Actuators A 267 24210.1016/j.sna.2017.10.021 ↗
11. Dahiya A S, Opoku C, Sporea R A and Sarvankumar B 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 1923210.1038/srep19232 ↗
12. Opokua C, Dahiyaa A S, Oshman C, Cayrela F, Poulin-Vittrant G, Alquiera D et al 2015 Phys. Proc. 70 85810.1016/j.phpro.2015.08.176 ↗
13. Ellmer K 2014 Nat. Photonics 6 80910.1038/nphoton.2012.282 ↗
14. Mani G K, Morohoshi M, Yasoda Y, Yokoyama S, Kimura H and Tsuchiya K 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 519310.1021/acsami.6b16261 ↗
15. Shiryaev M A, Eremin S A and Baranov A N 2014 Nanotechnol. Russ. 9 9910.1134/S1995078014020153 ↗
16. Chen H and Fang X 2015 Mater. Today 18 49310.1016/j.mattod.2015.06.001 ↗
17. Hongsitha N, Wongrata E, Kerdcharoen T and Choopuna S 2010 Sens. Actuators B 144 6710.1016/j.snb.2009.10.037 ↗
18. Cao Z, Wang Y, Li Z G and Yu N 2016 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11 34710.1186/s11671-016-1563-x ↗
19. Hasnidawani J N, Azlina H N, Norita H, Bonnia N N, Ratim S and Ali E S 2016 Proc. Chem. 19 21110.1016/j.proche.2016.03.095 ↗
20. Meng Y, Lin Y and Lin Y 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 169310.1016/j.ceramint.2013.07.065 ↗
21. Abduev A K, Shasvarov A, Akhmedov A K and Terukov E I 2002 Tech. Phys. Lett. 28 95210.1134/1.1526894 ↗
22. Cuellar Murilloa G A, Bojorgea C D, Herediaa E A and Walsoe de Recaa N E 2015 Proc. Mater. Sci. 8 630
23. Yi G-C, Wang C and Park W I 2005 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 20 2210.1088/0268-1242/20/4/003 ↗
24. Qurashi A 2013 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 74 16610.1016/j.jpcs.2012.09.003 ↗
25. Liu Y, Li S, Lv H, Ping D, Li S, Li Z et al 2014 Ceram. Int. 40 297310.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.011 ↗
26. Hosanpoor M, Aliofkhazraei M and Delavari H 2015 Proc. Mater. Sci. 11 32010.1016/j.mspro.2015.11.101 ↗
27. Hasnidawani J N, Azlina H N, Norita H, Samat N, Bonnia N N and Surip S N 2017 Mater. Sci. Forum 894 7610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.894.76 ↗
28. Selvam M, Saminathan K, Siva P, Saha P and Rajendran V 2016 J. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1 12910.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.01.051 ↗
29. Sherif E-S M and Almajid A A 2011 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 6 213110.1016/S1452-3981(23)18172-7 ↗
30. Subannajui K 2016 Chem. Commun. 52 319510.1039/C5CC09051B ↗
31. Vogels M J, Kloprogge T and Geus J W 2005 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 285 8610.1016/j.jcis.2004.11.045 ↗
32. Brindha R, Karthigai Selvii B and Selvam M 2018 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. App. 2 6
33. Lemoine P, Quinn J P, Maguire P D and McLaughlin J A D 2017 Carbon 44 261710.1016/j.carbon.2006.04.029 ↗
34. Newton M C and Warburton P A 2007 Mater. Today 10 5010.1016/S1369-7021(07)70079-2 ↗
35. Shiojini M and Kaito C 1985 J. Cryst. Growth 5 64
36. Ronning C, Shang N G, Gerhards I and Hofsass H 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 98 3430710.1063/1.1997290 ↗
37. Wu L, Wu Y, Shi Y and Wei H 2006 Rare Metals 25 6810.1016/S1001-0521(06)60017-X ↗
38. Raji R and Gopchandran K G 2017 J. Sci.: Adv. Mater. Devices 2 5110.1016/j.jsamd.2017.02.002 ↗
39. Kishore Kumar K, Brindha R, Nandhini M, Selvam M, Saminathan K and Sakthipandi K 2019 Ionics 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-019-02924-710.1007/s11581-019-02924-7 ↗
40. Elangovan N 2018 J. Surf. Sci. Nanotech. 16 510.1380/ejssnt.2018.5 ↗